Started By
Message

re: I hope we adjust the line up a little today

Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:24 am to
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84986 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:24 am to
quote:

I don’t care what he does in the field
This makes you really stupid. Southern Miss has a terrible defense and they’re a 3 seed thanks to it.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84986 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Reid isn't that far off defensively
You have CTE?
Posted by GeauxTime9
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Dec 2010
6394 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:32 am to
quote:

amazing that people can watch a team absolutely explode, score the most runs all season and then call for a lineup change barely 12 hours later


I think it’s pretty obvious that we need to make a change with Hal. I’m not requesting some major change to the line up. I simply changed a few pieces to allow for a better batter to enter the line up. It would be different if I was talking about removing a +.200 hitter. We are talking about a kid who is 0-20 in the last few games. At this point he needs a mental break. Also like another poster mentioned he did not look comfortable at the plate.

IMO, Hal’s glove doesn’t over come his batting at the plate. Reid is a serviceable 3rd baseman with a better batter. Also, this allows Gio to enter the line up and he has proved to be a better batter with better speed than Hal.

Btw, this is a message board right? A place to share your thoughts?
Posted by Terrific Tales
Member since Jan 2019
19425 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:33 am to
Hughes should try using a smaller bat like Broussard did. It has worked wonders for Brandt and it can’t really hurt Hal.
Posted by GeauxTime9
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Dec 2010
6394 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Hughes at 3B is an asset. Even more so when the rest of the lineup hits. The OP is arse backwards. It’s when you have hitting like that last night when you should feel comfortable sacrificing a bat for defense. Not the other way around


Far from arse backwards. I agree Hal is a great 3B who gives you some great range and probably gets you some outs that Reid wouldn’t get you. However, Hal is batting .175 in college baseball. Can you please name a previous player that has batted under .200 this late in the season and continues to play because he offered a good glove. Hell I would be good with Hal being a .230ish hitter. Right now, his glove doesn’t outweigh the automatic out that he is in the line up.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84986 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:38 am to
quote:

IMO, Hal’s glove doesn’t over come his batting at the plate.
Post season baseball is different. It’s about pitching and outs more than anything. Stony brook had the same amount of hits as us. The difference? Walks and defense. LSU had timely hits but they don’t get into those situations without SB walking batters, errors and misalignments. LSU only walked one batter and turned a few DPs keeping pitch counts down and shortening innings.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84986 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Hal is batting .175 in college baseball.
No shite? Bet you wanted to bench Stevenson too.
quote:

Right now, his glove doesn’t outweigh the automatic out that he is in the line up.
Right now... it literally does. That’s my point. If the lineup around him is solid, that’s when you make a hitting sacrifice for defense. You don’t have to have the extra hits. You need the outs though.
Posted by HighRoller
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2011
4078 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:41 am to
Hal should just lay down a bunt every at bat
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84986 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:42 am to
Probably won’t happen in many 9-1 games.
Posted by GeauxTime9
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Dec 2010
6394 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Post season baseball is different. It’s about pitching and outs more than anything. Stony brook had the same amount of hits as us. The difference? Walks and defense. LSU had timely hits but they don’t get into those situations without SB walking batters, errors and misalignments. LSU only walked one batter and turned a few DPs keeping pitch counts down and shortening innings.


What did the extra base hits look like?

I’m entitled to my own opinion, I simply don’t think Hal Hughes defense outweighs his batting. Can you answer my question regarding the last time LSU has a player hit under .200 and stayed in the line up?

This post was edited on 6/1/19 at 10:44 am
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
27803 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Can you please name a previous player that has batted under .200 this late in the season and continues to play because he offered a good glove

Stevenson in 2013.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84986 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:44 am to
quote:

Can you answer my question regarding the last time LSU has a player hit under .200 and stayed in the line up?
Stevenson.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70855 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:45 am to
quote:

Can you please name a previous player that has batted under .200 this late in the season and continues to play because he offered a good glove.


Andrew Stevenson 2013.

/thread
Posted by GeauxTime9
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Dec 2010
6394 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:45 am to
quote:

No shite? Bet you wanted to bench Stevenson too.


Your a jackass if you think Hal Hughes and Stevenson had any comparison at the plate.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84986 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:45 am to
You’re*

And he hit 0.190 at the plate in 2013. Why did he play? All of the offense around him.

ETA: 0.193/0.218/0.289 to be exact. Nearly the same line as Hughes whose OBP is 0.278
This post was edited on 6/1/19 at 10:49 am
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
27803 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:47 am to
quote:

Your a jackass if you think Hal Hughes and Stevenson had any comparison at the plate.

I don’t think Hughes will have the same turn around that Stevenson did, but it’s an absolute fact that these same conversations were had about him on this very board in 2013 (and most of them centered on our current first base coach being the replacement).
Posted by GeauxTime9
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Dec 2010
6394 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:49 am to
Stevenson had a lot more upside to him. There is a reason Stevenson is/was an MLB player. Call me when Hal sniffs the league.

We are getting away from the main point

Reid is a better option at 3rd. Now, I love the idea of Hal coming in late in the game for defense.
This post was edited on 6/1/19 at 10:50 am
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70855 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Your a jackass if you think Hal Hughes and Stevenson had any comparison at the plate.



So you clearly did not watch LSU baseball in 2013.
Posted by GeismarGeauxer
Geismar
Member since Dec 2009
5173 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:49 am to
Hal is hitting .176 and his .278 on base percentage is worse than 7 others batting average.

LINK
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84986 posts
Posted on 6/1/19 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Stevenson has a lot more upside to him.
We weren’t playing Stevenson in CF in 2013 in Omaha because of his fricking upside. Eat shite.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram