- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/3/21 at 12:37 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:I pay for my own tickets thank you very much.
Glad your dad bought you season tickets.
Man you pro Coach O guys just love to insult anyone who has any type of criticism of what he does.
This thread isn't about Cregg. It's about his track record when it comes to hires. That record of hiring coaches is fair to criticize. Objectively he's only made two good hires, and one of them left after a single season.
The system that Coach O is set up to coach in relies on excellent assistant coaches because of his inability to coach either side of the ball. So yeah, when the programs success relies on the ability of the assistant coaches, and the head coach has a spotty record of making good hires, questions should be asked. Especially if the goal is winning championships like you say yours is.
Posted on 6/3/21 at 12:40 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
Orgeron has basically made two good hires in 4 years. He's had to fire, reassign or get help for 6 hires after only 1 season. It's absolutely a fair question. If he has to do again after this year, what kind of confidence do you have that he will be successful in the next hires?
Active coaches with Natty's
Saban 6 learned from the master "Bill Bell"
Dabo Sweeney 2 very little coaching turn over
Mac Brown 1 tail end of his career
Jimbo 1 weak conference at the time
Orgeron 1 learned several hard lessons, he knows he
must make better hires
Posted on 6/3/21 at 12:46 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
On top of that, it isn't like Coach O is having to try and find coaches that are diamonds on the rough because of budget restrictions. Or that it's tough to convince coaches to come to LSU. LSU has one of the highest assistant coaching budgets in all of college football, and some of the best talent a coach can ask for.
If LSU had high turnover because of success like they did in 2019, you wouldn't hear me say a peep. It's the high turnover rate due to failure that's concerning, especially given the money and resources that LSU throws around to hire those individuals.
If LSU had high turnover because of success like they did in 2019, you wouldn't hear me say a peep. It's the high turnover rate due to failure that's concerning, especially given the money and resources that LSU throws around to hire those individuals.
Posted on 6/3/21 at 12:53 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
The system that Coach O is set up to coach in relies on excellent assistant coaches because of his inability to coach either side of the ball.
Apparently this "system" is important everywhere bc all teams are trying to hire the best assistants...even Bama.
What makes you think a guy who has been in coaching and football all his life can't coach either side of the ball? serious question
The Pelini hire was terrible but last yr was not a typical year either. Saban said when he was trying to build a dynasty that the toughest thing after winning a title was getting the 18-22 yr olds to come back with the same drive and enthusiasm the following year. I don't like excuses but I do believe that did play a part in last yr along with other factors.
Posted on 6/3/21 at 1:03 pm to Penrod
quote:
If he wins a natty every four years he can remake the staff as much as he wants.
Amen. I’d love one every year or every two but we aren’t Alabama. I’ll take every 4 years. That’s more than pretty much everyone else.
Posted on 6/3/21 at 1:19 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
Man you pro Coach O guys
I can tell how you vote based on this.
Pro Coach O..
I'm the one saying he should be gone if we lose more than 3 this year, you're only pissed off at "turnover."
Some of us think this shite through
Posted on 6/3/21 at 1:20 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:All teams want the best assistants they can get. But when your head coach doesn't coach either side of the ball, it becomes a little more important.
Apparently this "system" is important everywhere bc all teams are trying to hire the best assistants...even Bama.
Almost every top tier coach can coach one side of the ball. Saban and Kirby can coach the defense. Mullen, Jimbo, Riley, and Day can coach the offense. You see this in the NFL too. McVay, Belichick, Payton, etc.
quote:I think this for a few reasons
What makes you think a guy who has been in coaching and football all his life can't coach either side of the ball? serious question
1.Despite this extensive coaching career, he has never held a coordinator position.
2. He openly admitted from his time at Ole Miss that part of the reason the team failed was because he tried to do much. Said he needed to sit back and let the coaches coach. Not try to influence them. We all saw what happen when he tried this for the Troy game.
3. This past year we could all see that Bo was a disaster. I would assume that if he was a capable defense of coordinator he would have stepped in and fixed things. But we really didn't see any type of improvement throughout the season from a scheme perspective.
Maybe he can, but it hasn't been shown, and it's never something that's talked about when people bring up what Coach O is good at.
quote:It's been more than just the Pelini hire. In 2019 we had a young energetic coaching staff. In 2020 he replaced it with one of the oldest coaching staffs in the country. I like that Coach O reached out to Brady and Aranda to see who they thought would make good fits for the team. It's frustrating that he did that this year and not last year.
The Pelini hire was terrible
Coaches learn from their mistakes and that's part of the process, but when you're the head coach at LSU making 7 million dollars a year, having more misses than makes when it comes to assistant coaches shouldn't be acceptable.
Posted on 6/3/21 at 1:28 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:You'd be wrong. Again. But with almost 200k post you are bound to have some crappy takes.
I can tell how you vote based on this.
quote:What happened to 10+? Lowering your own bar?
I'm the one saying he should be gone if we lose more than 3 this year
Just a question, is it possible for you to respond without the little side jabs, or is that what get you through the day? Slight insults to random posters.
Posted on 6/3/21 at 1:29 pm to Gus007
quote:
Not only that but I rewatched the "18" game between LSU and Georgia last night. Number two team in the nation.
Georgia team was made up of four and five stars and Smart had a year head start over Orgeron. Their Defense was very strong.
LSU's OL was the difference in the game, in the fourth quarter. They opened holes for Brosette and Hilliard.
Creggs problem wasn't coaching it was recruiting.
Did you also catch the '18 games against SELU and LA Tech? Or are we only cherry picking the good ones?
Posted on 6/3/21 at 1:31 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
Orgeron has basically made two good hires in 4 years. He's had to fire, reassign or get help for 6 hires after only 1 season. It's absolutely a fair question. If he has to do again after this year, what kind of confidence do you have that he will be successful in the next hires?
It's not an unfair question.
He got the job in large part based upon a promise to bring Kiffen to LSU as OC. When that fell through he had to scramble and deliver a "big name" OC. Enter Canada. That relationship blew up after 3 games. He then hired E as OC. He was ok, but clearly wasn't going to make LSU a great offense (0 points in 8 quarters, at home, vs. Alabama). After two misses he hit on Brady. Then he hired Linehan seemingly out of nowhere…only to have to replace him one year later.
He essentially intertied Les's defensive staff. Bill Busch was hired at the demand of Aranda in order to remain at LSU. After Aranda left O hired Pelini...who was a disaster in every way imaginable (on the field and an insanely stupid contract). Jerry Sullivan was his first WR coach...who had to be replaced. Cregg has been lukewarm, at best.
Sure, other programs experience turnover. But very few of O's hires have moved on to "better" jobs. (Not counting analyst), on Brady and Meatball have left for promotions.
O has made two BIG (name and monetarily) coordinator hires: Canada and Pelini. BOTH ended in a year with LSU having to eat big buyouts to get rid of them. He hasn't been a hiring savant. He's basically hitting .250 thus far. It just so happens he hit a grand slam when he paired up Brady with the experienced roster in 2019.
It seems like O's entire career/life has been a cycle of stupid mistakes. Learning from those mistakes to have some success. Only to then make another round of stupid mistakes. Hopefully we are in an "upswing" in that cycle. I'm certainly optimistic!
Posted on 6/3/21 at 1:33 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
I'm the one saying he should be gone if we lose more than 3 this year
What happened to 10+? Lowering your own bar?
No, and I can also do math, for a 13 game (including bowl) season.
We have 12 games, we lose two we aren't winning the West or getting in the playoffs, so that makes 13 games with a bowl. We lose the bowl game, 10 = 3 -= 13.
Those are the margins, you seem to think math works differently. I don't expect much more from someone more pissed about "turnover" than wins and losses.
Posted on 6/3/21 at 2:02 pm to Alt26
quote:
When that fell through he had to scramble and deliver a "big name" OC.
I don't see why he would have had to scramble. If I recall correctly, Kiffin getting a head coaching job was always a possibility. Orgeron should have had a list of better backup choices already vetted.
quote:
Sullivan was his first WR coach...who had to be replaced.
Mickey Joseph was the WR coach in 2017. Sullivan replaced him as WR coach.
Posted on 6/3/21 at 2:03 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Nobody counts a bowl game when predicting pre-season records.
No, and I can also do math, for a 13 game (including bowl) season
quote:For someone who thinks they're as smart as they are, you would think that they would realize that besides Alabama, there's a pretty strong correlation between staff turnover and wins/losses.
I don't expect much more from someone more pissed about "turnover" than wins and losses.
Posted on 6/3/21 at 2:03 pm to nicholastiger
So Nicholastiger, what do u think? Let's just fire O & hire Lil'Nicky? I am sure in your heart of hearts, Lil'Nicky is just waiting for Nicholastiger to invite him back.
OK, lets go with that.
OK, lets go with that.
Posted on 6/3/21 at 2:04 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
No, and I can also do math, for a 13 game (including bowl) season
Nobody counts a bowl game when predicting pre-season records.
We do it every single year, Jethro
Every year.
Posted on 6/3/21 at 2:12 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:No we don't
We do it every single year
And neither does anyone else. If you googled LSU record prediction you'd be hard pressed to find a prediction that includes a bowl game. The overwhelming majority are just regular season games.
Posted on 6/3/21 at 2:14 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Unless they voluntarily leave for another position.
It all comes down to W/L.
Yeah if we go 10-3 and 11-2 the next two years but O wants a new DC do we care?
No.
If we go 7-6 and 8-5 and he wants a new DC we start to care.
Posted on 6/3/21 at 2:17 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
And neither does anyone else.
Absolutely.
If you tell someone that a three loss season is the floor, you aren't amending that for a bowl game chief.
That is the floor, period. Your shitty math skills nothwithstanding.
Posted on 6/3/21 at 2:50 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:If LSU goes 9-3 in the regular season nobody cares about the mediocre bowl game. Nobody includes the bowl game in pre-season predictions
If you tell someone that a three loss season is the floor, you aren't amending that for a bowl game chief.
quote:Do you have anything substantial to add to the actual topic on this thread? Or are you just posting just to post? I would think someone averaging 43 post a day over the past 12 years would be above ad hominem jabs to someone who never said anything to you to begin with.
Your shitty math skills nothwithstanding.
But maybe not. I mean what kind of person averages 43 post a day for 12 years on an online forum? Really makes you think.
Popular
Back to top



0



