- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How can the SEC office not review the play?
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:37 pm
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:37 pm
This may have been brought up, but how in the world can the SEC not have a procedure in place where they review calls like the targeting call? I'm not talking right then and there, because obviously they did and still failed. I'm talking durimg the week.
Take the NBA for example, they are well known for reviewing technical fouls and rescinding those techs a day or two after the particular game takes place. For the SEC not to have a procedure in place where they review calls that impact or could impact future games say during the day on a Tuesday, and then announce their ruling on that Tuesday afternoon is an absolute joke.
Take the NBA for example, they are well known for reviewing technical fouls and rescinding those techs a day or two after the particular game takes place. For the SEC not to have a procedure in place where they review calls that impact or could impact future games say during the day on a Tuesday, and then announce their ruling on that Tuesday afternoon is an absolute joke.
This post was edited on 10/20/18 at 11:40 pm
10
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:38 pm to CP3forMVP
Is it the SEC or the NCAA that is responsible?
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:38 pm to CP3forMVP
Change your title you dick
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:39 pm to CP3forMVP
Your title is bullshite
Much better
Much better
This post was edited on 10/20/18 at 11:44 pm
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:39 pm to CP3forMVP
He reviewed it secretly:
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:40 pm to CP3forMVP
quote:I actually think Greg had a good idea in saying there should be levels of targeting. so a fricking love tap like white did doesn't cost a fricking ejection.
I'm not talking right then and there, because obviously they did and still failed. I'm talking durimg the week.
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:41 pm to NamariTiger
quote:
Change your title you dick
Change your signature you ignorant frick
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:42 pm to CP3forMVP
Not sure the NCAA gives them that power.
It should, but then again all officials should be employed by the NCAA, not the conferences. Take it for what it's worth.
GEAUX TIGERS
It should, but then again all officials should be employed by the NCAA, not the conferences. Take it for what it's worth.
GEAUX TIGERS
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:44 pm to Thorny
quote:
but then again all officials should be employed by the NCAA, not the conferences.
Agreed
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:44 pm to CP3forMVP
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:48 pm to Mrwhodat
FIFY
This post was edited on 10/20/18 at 11:48 pm
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:50 pm to CP3forMVP
quote:they did
How can the SEC office not review the play?
in Birmingham
took them about 12 seconds
and confirmed it
which says it all
This post was edited on 10/20/18 at 11:51 pm
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:52 pm to CP3forMVP
Saw a tweet from Moscona that states the SEC can go back and review the call. Screw the whole Bama agenda thing that may or may not be true, the SEC seriously needs to step up to the plate and do the right thing here. Admit a mistake, prove there is no Bama bias.
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:56 pm to CP3forMVP
Same was said in the radio show earlier —- it can be looked at on Monday.
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:59 pm to CP3forMVP
quote:I know they've reviewed and rescinded suspensions for targeting in the past.
Saw a tweet from Moscona that states the SEC can go back and review the call. Screw the whole Bama agenda thing that may or may not be true, the SEC seriously needs to step up to the plate and do the right thing here. Admit a mistake, prove there is no Bama bias.
HOWEVER, that was before automatic reviewing on the field was initiated.
And hasn't the SEC already issued a statement saying that there is no appeal and suspension stands?
Posted on 10/21/18 at 8:33 am to I20goon
quote:
And hasn't the SEC already issued a statement saying that there is no appeal and suspension stands?
To me that statement seemed like a reaction, "official thought the QB was hit in the head, rule book states..." sort of deal. I'm hoping they still review the call, see what a terrible call it was, and overturn it. Though I'm not expecting it.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 8:39 am to CP3forMVP
The most suspicious part of this whole situation is that the SEC office had already put out an official statement about the call and suspension less than 30 minutes after the game.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 8:42 am to I20goon
An official's psyche is more important than integrity of the game.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News