re: Hill decision stirs up debate, Armchair judges replay Jackson’s call

quote:

---

And then again, I kind of wonder if this guy is the slut's father.

---

Not her dad. I don't have any daughters. Which I am couldn't be more thrilled about after seeing what grown men will say about a 14 year old girl.

So because she was 14 at the time, that exonerates her?

This isn't 1950.

There are 14 year old whores that chase football players and give blow jobs in locker rooms.

quote:

---

Then you're a shitty lawyer if you take the BOI as a statement of fact.

I feel sorry for this state if you actually passed the bar here.

---

I never said it was a statement of fact. However, it does set out what you expect to be able to prove at trial.

quote:

---

I am very much a lawyer

---

Well then GTFO and go do lawyers things. Bitching about Jeremy Hill on here ain't gonna win you any cases!

quote:

---

which that BOI proved impossible to prove in a trial so why would you even bring it up? because it supports your agenda and you figured nobody would notice?

---

I brought it up because when it was filed, the DA's office believed that they would be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the allegations made in BOI. The fact that the BOI became unprovable later, due in part to the accuser not wanting to testify, doesn't change the fact that at the time of the filing the allegations made were very serious and go far beyond simply a guy getting a consensual BJ in a locker room.

If you go back and look I acknowledged that is why this was leveraged to a plea where the charge was reduced. If there was nothing there and JHill did absolutely nothing wrong then why would he even agree to a plea deal? For all of the talk about the girl not wanting to testify proving that she was lying and was a willing participant I don't see any discussion of the accused's willingness to accept a plea deal being indicative of his guilt for the original charge.

Believe what you want and I will do the same.

Best case scenario is that Blue and Hilliard play lights out and Hill never sees the field this year.

quote:

---

If you go back and look I acknowledged that is why this was leveraged to a plea where the charge was reduced. If there was nothing there and JHill did absolutely nothing wrong then why would he even agree to a plea deal? For all of the talk about the girl not wanting to testify proving that she was lying and was a willing participant I don't see any discussion of the accused's willingness to accept a plea deal being indicative of his guilt for the original charge.

---

There is a video of Hill receiving a willing blowjob from a 14 year old. That is carnal knowledge of a juvenile, to which he plead guilty. Hill committed a misdemeanor not the felony you are assuming him guilty of. No way you are a lawyer.

quote:

---

You infer a lot when reading my posts.

---

I don't have to infer when you plainly state it:

quote:

---

The difference is that I doubt you shoved your dick down the throat of a girl that was not a willing participant. Again, read the bill of information.

---

no joke, unless you show us a pick of that law degree or a video on Hill raping chicks then you've just insulted half this thread!