- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/17/25 at 4:56 pm to GumboPot
If you are willing to accept an out from a bunt to advance the runner and he is indeed called for an out, it's a sacrifice. If he ends up being safe it's scored a single.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 7:09 pm to Glizzy_gang
quote:yikes
1st and 2nd with one out should be automatic bunt unless you’ve got Tommy white or crews at the plate.
1st and 3rd to get the safety squeeze works well too but not as much of a no brained. Just puts the defense in a pickle
Posted on 2/17/25 at 7:20 pm to GumboPot
Fun fact - sac bunt is Latin, for "bag full". I'm not kidding.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 7:25 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
herefore the only reason to do it is bottom of the 9th with bats that can bring in the runner from 3rd behind the bunter.
7th and 8th innings with tie games is also a decent spot to do it, weather and other factors pending
Posted on 2/17/25 at 7:30 pm to Glizzy_gang
quote:
1st and 2nd with one out should be automatic bunt unless you’ve got Tommy white or crews at the plate.
If only there were studies done to show which method provided more expected runs
Posted on 2/17/25 at 7:47 pm to josh336
[/url][/img]
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News