- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Guy LeCompte will not be an analyst with LSU
Posted on 1/21/18 at 9:48 am to CP3forMVP
Posted on 1/21/18 at 9:48 am to CP3forMVP
quote:
Guy LeCompte will not be an analyst with LSU
I hated it at first but after hearing how the PodofGeauxld guys talk about him I didn't mind it.
You’re dumber than them then. You want to give a HS Coach that is excellent a shot? Go to Zachary and give Brewerton that job. That guy is a winner. Anyone who can take frickING LIVONIA to a championship and be responsible for a title there, then do the same at Zachary, is a GREAT COACH.
0
Posted on 1/21/18 at 9:57 am to TigerChief10
quote:
circle jerk of hatred
The best kind. Solid grips all the way around
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:28 am to The First Cut
quote:
Where's the job coming from? It doesn't take a genius to see he isn't getting a seven figure job anywhere, if he gets a job at all this year. Does anyone have any openings anymore? Most figured he'd end up with a $600,000 per job at Rutgers this year. Even they passed on him.
Youre using knowledge and information you have now to make judgements on a decision Canada made weeks ago, when there were lots of jobs available. It's not at all out of the realm of possibility that someone with Canada's apparent ego would choose to roll the dice on himself and take a chance on the possibility to make more money, especially given the relatively low breakeven number needed by today's coaching salary standards. If it doesn't work out that way then it was a poor choice, but the reasoning behind the choice doesn't change.
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:33 am to Open Your Eyes
You're another one calling him stupid. When you're unemployed you lose significant leverage. No one is going to pay top dollar to someone with these credentials:
1. Unemployed
2. No one competing for his services
3. Fired twice in three years for fighting with staff
1. Unemployed
2. No one competing for his services
3. Fired twice in three years for fighting with staff
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:44 am to CapperVin
quote:
Guy is a great offensive coach who would have def been an asset for the program. He's brought success to the Mandeville program that they have never seen before.
He never even won a district championship in a cream puff district.
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:48 am to The First Cut
quote:
You're another one calling him stupid.
Really? Where?
quote:
You're another one calling him stupid. When you're unemployed you lose significant leverage. No one is going to pay top dollar
Top dollar is what he made at Lsu. He didn't need anything close to that for this to be a good financial decision.
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:49 am to BlackAdam
quote:
quote:
Guy is a great offensive coach who would have def been an asset for the program. He's brought success to the Mandeville program that they have never seen before.
He never even won a district championship in a cream puff district.
It’s the usual O pumpers. Just ignore him.
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:53 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
Really? Where?
Master P can negotiate better deals than taking that deal if you had no other reason than thinking you can come out ahead.
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:53 am to BlackAdam
Wrong.
Posted on 1/21/18 at 11:24 am to The First Cut
quote:
Master P can negotiate better deals than taking that deal if you had no other reason than thinking you can come out ahead.
How does that answer the question of where I called Canada stupid?
It doesn't. So you're just another orgeron fanatic looking to shite on Canada with no actual substance. Got it.
Why do I get the feeling if Canada had gotten a job and was going to make more than $3.25 over the next 2 years you would be nowhere to be found? And you can change 'had gotten' and 'was going to make' to 'gets' and 'makes' and it would still be true.
Posted on 1/21/18 at 1:15 pm to Tiger1988
quote:
It’s the usual O pumpers. Just ignore him.
showing your ignorance once again. I've never been an O supporter and that's from day 1. So why don't you kindly GFY
Posted on 1/21/18 at 3:11 pm to Open Your Eyes
quote:
How does that answer the question of where I called Canada stupid?
If your business acumen is that minuscule then I'll spell it out for you. To say that his ego was too big for him to realize that it's a poor decision to leave $1.2 MM on the table because you think you can make it up somewhere is saying he's not a shrewd negotiator.
quote:
It doesn't. So you're just another orgeron fanatic looking to shite on Canada with no actual substance. Got it.
I didn't say anything about Orgeron so you got that wrong, got it?
quote:
Why do I get the feeling if Canada had gotten a job and was going to make more than $3.25 over the next 2 years you would be nowhere to be found? And you can change 'had gotten' and 'was going to make' to 'gets' and 'makes' and it would still be true.
AGAIN, when you are taking a reduced deal for an exit you should be smart enough, or at least your representation should be smart enough to realize, that you are moving to a position of significantly less leverage. You're going to be unemployed, you've been fired twice in three years, you have no leverage for high compensation. You've also known since September this was coming and can work your network, so he should have an inkling of your demand. If he failed to realize all of that, as you suggest, then you aren't very smart. On the other hand, I give him more credit than that. He took the deal because he got something out of it. We know non-disclosure was part of the deal. If LSU wanted it, they would've paid a premium for it. Since Canada wanted it, it came at a discount for LSU.
Posted on 1/21/18 at 3:36 pm to The First Cut
quote:
If your business acumen is that minuscule then I'll spell it out for you.
at you thinking you can lecture anyone about business acumen after your master p comment. quote:
To say that his ego was too big for him to realize that it's a poor decision to leave $1.2 MM on the table because you think you can make it up somewhere is saying he's not a shrewd negotiator.
It's quite clear you and your business acumen fail to have an understanding of simple math, basic economics, or basic risk analysis.
quote:
I didn't say anything about Orgeron so you got that wrong, got it?
Your post history says plenty. It says I got that right.
quote:
AGAIN, when you are taking a reduced deal for an exit you should be smart enough, or at least your representation should be smart enough to realize, that you are moving to a position of significantly less leverage. You're going to be unemployed, you've been fired twice in three years, you have no leverage for high compensation.
None of that addresses my belief that you wouldn't/won't be posting any of this if/when Canada gets a job that allows him to make more than his original buyout amount.
AGAIN, you fail to understand simple math, basic economics, and basic risk analysis. Additionally, you clearly have no understanding of the ego-driven mindset that drives the decisions of most people at this level in the coaching community.
quote:
He took the deal because he got something out of it. We know non-disclosure was part of the deal. If LSU wanted it, they would've paid a premium for it. Since Canada wanted it, it came at a discount for LSU.
Your implication that Canada took this deal because he's trying to hide something can just as easily be turned around the other way.
Lsu took the deal because they got something out of it. We know non-disclosure was part of the deal. If Canada wanted it, he would've paid a premium for it. Since LSU wanted it, it came at a discount for Canada.
This post was edited on 1/21/18 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 1/21/18 at 3:41 pm to BlackAdam
quote:BOOM
He never even won a district championship in a cream puff district.
This post was edited on 1/21/18 at 3:42 pm
Posted on 1/21/18 at 6:28 pm to CapperVin
quote:
showing your ignorance once again. I've never been an O supporter and that's from day 1. So why don't you kindly GFY
How about giving 1 reason a coach who hasn’t won a district title in a weak district is a “great” offensive hire.
Here you go:
Brewerton can coach circles around him. How about giving him a shot instead of the client of YOUR COUSIN.
Posted on 1/21/18 at 6:30 pm to Open Your Eyes
The fact that you believe that Canada can command $3MM over the next two years demonstrates that you don't have a clue, there's no point in continuing. Have a great night. 
Posted on 1/21/18 at 6:34 pm to geauxtigers33
quote:
First thing Canada was not fired. It was a mutual separation that’s why LSU doesn’t pay full buyout.
You are talking about semantics, technically you are correct Canada wasn't fired. But in actuality, he was because he wasn't going to coach next year under Orgeron. So call it whatever you want to justify your comments but the reality of it is that he was fired even if he didn't hear the famous words by Trump of "You're fired"
Posted on 1/21/18 at 7:36 pm to The First Cut
quote:
The fact that you believe that Canada can command $3MM over the next two years demonstrates that you don't have a clue, there's no point in continuing. Have a great night.
The fact that you think Canada needs to get $3 million over the next 2 years for this to have been a profitable move for him confirms once and for all that you have no understanding of simple math, basic economics, and basic risk analysis.
Posted on 1/21/18 at 8:30 pm to Tiger1988
quote:maybe but he's currently employed
Brewerton can coach circles around him.
Mandeville in the final Cal preps rankings finished #64 without Lecompte. The last 5 years under Lecompte they've been #27, #16, #19, #37, and #8. You know they're not playing with great talent there and it's a non-select school.
This post was edited on 1/21/18 at 8:34 pm
Posted on 1/21/18 at 8:36 pm to schwartzy
W1ww2111222222w 22222221211122221212w22222222222222222w222222w2222222122222
Page 5 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News