- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fulton halfway through a two-year suspension
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:00 pm to LSU Patrick
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:00 pm to LSU Patrick
quote:Just a re-test for the NCAA. They test to see if it is diluted on the spot. If so, you pee again. I actually was diluted the one time the ncaa tested me. We had a match the next day, so I was pumping fluids. I was notified that I had an NCAA test in 2 hours. Nothing I could do. First batch of piss was too diluted. Waited 25 minutes, pinched the buttcheeks and bladder as hard as I could, and got enough for a good sample
Sometimes even a dilute sample is considered tampering.
quote:
Student-athletes who have had a previous positive result, or had previous multiple dilutes, may be subject to follow-up tests and may be tested with an expanded panel that includes street drugs and stimulants.
quote:
Can student-athletes beat a drug test by consuming large amounts of fluids?
No. NCAA protocol requires each student-athlete urine sample be analyzed onsite prior to sending the sample to the lab. If the specimen is too dilute, the student-athlete will be required to remain in drug testing until an adequate specimen is collected.
This could take several hours. A student-athlete who produces multiple diluted samples is subject to follow-up drug tests.
This post was edited on 3/12/18 at 3:04 pm
1
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:01 pm to lsupride87
Thanks. I wasn't sure on NCAA's procedure.
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:06 pm to LSU Patrick
The only ever time someone on our team got an NCAA test, was at the NCAA championships.
And the weird part was, he was a senior, and we had just lost out and were done with competition when he was requested for testing
So no clue what would have happened if he tested positive
And the weird part was, he was a senior, and we had just lost out and were done with competition when he was requested for testing
So no clue what would have happened if he tested positive
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:08 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Nah, they dont even test for this in their annual testing programs apparently. So either Fulton was an idiot and didnt do his homework and tampered a test that would have been fine, or he was on the juice
Did he travel to the bowl against Louisville? Maybe got tested there where they run the expanded panel?
Just trying to figure out a way where it wouldn't be one of the two options you presented. Both are embarrassingly incompetent.
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:09 pm to tigercross
quote:It is possible
Did he travel to the bowl against Louisville? Maybe got tested there where they run the expanded panel?
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:11 pm to lsupride87
quote:The rule for recreational drugs used to be the school had to set a testing policy (with penalties) and then NCAA became involved if you didn't adhere to that. Not sure when that changed.
quote:
back in the late 90's I know they didn't test for recreational drugs
quote:
The NCAA has been testing for marijuana usage for nearly three decades — since 1986 — but a culture change in our country has forced the group to take a closer look at the impact of the drug on college athletics.
But I agree I thought there was something that said they didnt test for it during their yearly tests, just special occasions
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:12 pm to Stephen1979
Sorry you are too busy firing O in every thread to stay on topic, sparky.
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:13 pm to I20goon
And people still have confidence in Eddie O’s ability to run a major program.
L O freaking L...
L O freaking L...
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:14 pm to I20goon
quote:That is almost the rule
The rule for recreational drugs used to be the school had to set a testing policy (with penalties) and then NCAA became involved if you didn't adhere to that. Not sure when that changed.
THe difference is, the school doesnt have to set any drug testing policy at all. But if it does, it then has to adhere to it. So, if wanted, a school can not drug test its athletes at all. I believe Oregon is like this
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:18 pm to phi1514
quote:
And people still have confidence in Eddie O’s ability to run a major program.
L O freaking L...
I know. Sheesh. It's crazy. Dumbass O made Kristian provide a fraudulent sample before he was even head coach.
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:18 pm to The Baker
quote:
Hmmm
Weed and not play college football
Or
No weed and play for millions...
Tough choice these kids have to make. Wouldn’t want to go through that decision.
Or
Go to Bama where apparently, there is no drug testing.
Maybe that's why the recruits are going there LOL
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:19 pm to husslemane
quote:Yall are both clueless, and embarrassingly obsessed
Or
Go to Bama where apparently, there is no drug testing.
Maybe that's why the recruits are going there LOL
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:23 pm to lsupride87
quote:yep. I remember Ole Miss didn't have one at all for a long while. No coincidence that their in-house penalties are pretty light by comparison.
That is almost the rule
THe difference is, the school doesnt have to set any drug testing policy at all. But if it does, it then has to adhere to it. So, if wanted, a school can not drug test its athletes at all. I believe Oregon is like this
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:25 pm to I20goon
quote:There current policy is a joke anyway
yep. I remember Ole Miss didn't have one at all for a long while. No coincidence that their in-house penalties are pretty light by comparison.
First failed test-no suspension
Second Failed Test- No suspension
THird failed test-3 games
This post was edited on 3/12/18 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:27 pm to lsupride87
Do they test for Human Growth Hormones? If they are then there is no way in hell Bama can be getting past real random test unless they have some break though masking agent.
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:27 pm to GermantownTiger
quote:this joke by you isn't very funny..
Time to go O. What a joke
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:29 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:Of course not. They arent drawing blood
Do they test for Human Growth Hormones?
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:31 pm to lsupride87
Hard to believe the number of people blaming someone else, other than Fulton.
Yep, let's all just call the whole situation O's fault cause how could this be the kids fault.
Yep, let's all just call the whole situation O's fault cause how could this be the kids fault.
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:32 pm to SouthernInsanity
quote:I think people are blaming O for not recruiting this position knowing the lack of players available.....
Yep, let's all just call the whole situation O's fault cause how could this be the kids fault.
Posted on 3/12/18 at 3:32 pm to SouthernInsanity
quote:
Yep, let's all just call the whole situation O's fault cause how could this be the kids fault.
Straw man argument. No one is saying that O is responsible for the suspension.
What O is responsible for is roster management in the wake of the suspension that's been a known quantity for at least a year now. That is where the criticism is coming in.
Page 9 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News