Started By
Message

re: Fired “without cause” but

Posted on 10/18/21 at 7:54 am to
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
52891 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 7:54 am to

quote:

They still released all the dirt, but just hid behind it as “anonymous sources”. It’s a joke.


Lol you think all of the dirt was the gas station comments.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
23664 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 8:11 am to
The "without cause" option is the BATNA for O's people and a good move by Woodward. O is going quietly, even somewhat helpfully by some views and LSU doesn't have to battle him in court over what the meaning of "is" is.

Everyone can wash their hands and move on.
Posted by GeauxFightingTigers1
Member since Oct 2016
12574 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 8:44 am to
quote:

The "without cause" option is the BATNA for O's people and a good move by Woodward. O is going quietly, even somewhat helpfully by some views and LSU doesn't have to battle him in court over what the meaning of "is" is. Everyone can wash their hands and move on.


Or another possibility, they never had cause.

Or yet another possibility, they had cause and didn't do anything about it at the time.

LSU has responsibilities to address any bad behavior with Ed, you can't hold things in ones back pocket.
Posted by TXTiger81
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2021
1676 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 8:55 am to
"Plausible deniability" until it all comes out at a later date and LSU doesn't pony up on the full buyout.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
51822 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 9:01 am to
There was obviously a credible threat of CAUSE, otherwise Orgeron would never have agreed to that buyout schedule, which significantly lowers the cost of the buyout. Unless, that is, the contract allowed that buyout schedule.
Posted by Kingpenm3
Xanadu
Member since Aug 2011
9745 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 9:05 am to
quote:

title IX issues stuck to O


Wouldn't those issues also stick to the university if the university made a point to use them to fire him?
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
23664 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Or another possibility, they never had cause.

Or yet another possibility, they had cause and didn't do anything about it at the time.

LSU has responsibilities to address any bad behavior with Ed, you can't hold things in ones back pocket.


Firings for cause are rarely a one event item. They typically are a demonstrated pattern of behavior. Those patterns take time to spot, document, and then prove up. Usually it’s easier and less contentious for all involved to agree to move on.
Posted by kengel2
Team Gun
Member since Mar 2004
33479 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 9:07 am to
If Woodward could have saved $17 million he should have done it.
Posted by GeauxFightingTigers1
Member since Oct 2016
12574 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 9:10 am to
quote:

Firings for cause are rarely a one event item. They typically are a demonstrated pattern of behavior. Those patterns take time to spot, document, and then prove up. Usually it’s easier and less contentious for all involved to agree to move on.


No, you have to address those things when they happen, you can't hold them in the back pocket. Now... whether the total amount of behavior constitutes "for cause" could take many events. However, I seriously doubt they addressed anything with Ed.

People were just making shite up.
Posted by GeauxFightingTigers1
Member since Oct 2016
12574 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Wouldn't those issues also stick to the university if the university made a point to use them to fire him?


Title IX investigations deal with the university that receives federal funding. So, yes.
Posted by LeGrosChat
Bangladesh
Member since Feb 2016
588 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 9:28 am to
Why is there not a morality/ethics or good behavior clause in O's contract? This would at least give AD leeway to offer or negotiate a lower Buyout settlement based on conduct detrimental to the university.
Posted by berniemoore
Denham Springs
Member since Apr 2021
1090 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 9:36 am to
No it’s not
It is creepy as all get out but not any thing to do with employment
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
48766 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 9:37 am to
Let's be honest here. He got the full buyout because while LSU has a ton of dirt on him. He also has a bunch of dirt on LSU and could bury the program. He got the buyout to be quiet.
Posted by GeauxFightingTigers1
Member since Oct 2016
12574 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Let's be honest here. He got the full buyout because while LSU has a ton of dirt on him. He also has a bunch of dirt on LSU and could bury the program. He got the buyout to be quiet.


Let's actually be honest instead of you not being honest.

You don't know, and people were potentially posting bullshite.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
37421 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 9:43 am to
quote:

There was obviously a credible threat of CAUSE, otherwise Orgeron would never have agreed to that buyout schedule, which significantly lowers the cost of the buyout. Unless, that is, the contract allowed that buyout schedule.

Except that if there was a credible enough threat wouldn’t fighting it out in court and prolonging paying it for several years be the more prudent choice? I mean, that’s a lot of money if there’s a chance it may not be legally owed.

I think maybe there was a credible threat, not of Cause but of a lot of other embarrassing things that would have come out.
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
48766 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 9:59 am to
quote:

Let's actually be honest instead of you not being honest.

You don't know, and people were potentially posting bullshite.



No I don't know specifics. But you tell me why they didn't fire him for cause, when just what we do know is enough. Why is it that it is extremely rare for a coach to be fired for cause when all of their contracts are loaded with moral standards they must follow. Its because big time college athletics is dirty and this isn't exclusive to the ones that have been caught in the past. Yes these things even happened at out beloved LSU, it happens everywhere.
Posted by LSUStar
Medellin
Member since Sep 2009
11405 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 1:03 pm to
The BOS?
Posted by GeauxFightingTigers1
Member since Oct 2016
12574 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

No I don't know specifics. But you tell me why they didn't fire him for cause, when just what we do know is enough. Why is it that it is extremely rare for a coach to be fired for cause when all of their contracts are loaded with moral standards they must follow. Its because big time college athletics is dirty and this isn't exclusive to the ones that have been caught in the past. Yes these things even happened at out beloved LSU, it happens everywhere.


I have no verified information as to what he could have fired him for cause for. That doesn't mean it doesn't exist, only I don't know about it.
This post was edited on 10/18/21 at 1:05 pm
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
23664 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 1:23 pm to
I never said you don't address them as they happen. I said in most cases a for-cause dismissal is based on a behavior pattern and not a single event.

I have no idea if LSU pulled O aside and said "coach you can't be hitting on married women", "coach, you can't have your bimbos and their kids interrupting practice".

Posted by TrouserTrout
Member since Nov 2017
6425 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 4:05 pm to
The Rant
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram