- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Examining the calls at the end of the game ...
Posted on 11/30/18 at 12:48 am to Buda
Posted on 11/30/18 at 12:48 am to Buda
You forgot a couple I think including a missed false start.
They finally called the other, but that probably hurt us more backing them up.. as they then got the free PI on Greedy.
They finally called the other, but that probably hurt us more backing them up.. as they then got the free PI on Greedy.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 12:49 am to Buda
Also, I feel that Mond was off the ground once he established control of the ball, before throwing the pick.
And the non fumble call was 100% a catch. He caught it, took steps with full control and then he was even transferring the ball I believe once we got to him.
And the non fumble call was 100% a catch. He caught it, took steps with full control and then he was even transferring the ball I believe once we got to him.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 12:50 am to Buda
1. Clock stopped when it shouldn't have.
2. False start. Bad one.
5. Turrbl.
7. That was absolutely not targeting. He dipped his shoulder to make contact, not his helmet.
2. False start. Bad one.
5. Turrbl.
7. That was absolutely not targeting. He dipped his shoulder to make contact, not his helmet.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 1:12 am to Teufelhunden
quote:You mean when the rb moved laterally? If so that's not illegal
Including the no call on the false start?
Posted on 11/30/18 at 6:41 am to Buda
But you're an Aggie. Hardly an impartial observer.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 6:42 am to Le Tenia
Jordan Jefferson tested that theory v. Ole Miss 2009.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:23 am to Buda
I don't care how you slice it, that game was given to A&M. Did LSU have moments to make them pay, yes thy did but then again, we made the plays when we needed only to be denied. Eventually an offense will take a breath when given life again and again.
At least 3 were judgement calls that in any other game would have been given to the defense which was making huge play after huge play. I've never in my life have seen where the team that was trying to make the comeback was given so many chances to come back.
I've never seen a game stopped once a clock hit zeros, especially in football and when the other team doesn't have timeouts. If they make that call on the field which they had already made then what's the point in reviewing it. The fumble called incomplete has been called a fumble every other time I've watched football. In fact the saints had a similar call not long ago and again last night that was called a fumble after replay. It wasn't so close that you just take the call on the field. If the guy hadn't been hit, he would have turned up field and scored.
Greedy call was the least of my concerns. Anyone saying anything less is simply a pussy who has now conceded to the media and the current sad state of the SEC. They're not giving LSU it's reasonable due. The call against Devin White was complete BS yet the SEC will not admit it. Same here but some of you idiots will simply fold to the narrative that LSU bitches about calls. No LSU doesn't, not when we are clearly beat but these types of games are called against LSU all too often. Bama, Auburn, State LY, A&M, it happens all the time and personally I'm sick of it.
At least 3 were judgement calls that in any other game would have been given to the defense which was making huge play after huge play. I've never in my life have seen where the team that was trying to make the comeback was given so many chances to come back.
I've never seen a game stopped once a clock hit zeros, especially in football and when the other team doesn't have timeouts. If they make that call on the field which they had already made then what's the point in reviewing it. The fumble called incomplete has been called a fumble every other time I've watched football. In fact the saints had a similar call not long ago and again last night that was called a fumble after replay. It wasn't so close that you just take the call on the field. If the guy hadn't been hit, he would have turned up field and scored.
Greedy call was the least of my concerns. Anyone saying anything less is simply a pussy who has now conceded to the media and the current sad state of the SEC. They're not giving LSU it's reasonable due. The call against Devin White was complete BS yet the SEC will not admit it. Same here but some of you idiots will simply fold to the narrative that LSU bitches about calls. No LSU doesn't, not when we are clearly beat but these types of games are called against LSU all too often. Bama, Auburn, State LY, A&M, it happens all the time and personally I'm sick of it.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:26 am to Voodoo_Tiger
Thank you Mr. Football
Posted on 11/30/18 at 8:25 am to Buda
NUMBER 4 - Bull shite! The officials let a play go to the end zone on an obvious grounded ball and THEN reviewed it. The play should have had a full review rather than MAtt Austin "counseling" our head coach about losing a time out. If there was ONE play to point to "game over" it was that one. Consistency is the name of the game in officiating. SEC officials have a hard time with that in ALL team's games.
Popular
Back to top
