Started By
Message

re: ESPN's Football Power Index Predicts 9-3 Regular Season for LSU

Posted on 7/8/19 at 2:34 pm to
Posted by HotTakeHerald
Member since Sep 2017
129 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

FPI projected us to play 12.3 games? I think you’re the one who botched the rounding.


It does show that. Because of chance of SECCG I guess?

But, OP was talking about regular season, so it would be 9.3 wins and 2.7 losses for regular season. So he rounded 9.3-2.7 down, which is reasonable.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52841 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

But, OP was talking about regular season, so it would be 9.3 wins and 2.7 losses for regular season. So he rounded 9.3-2.7 down, which is reasonable.


You have to love this time of year:

We take an arbitrarily assigned "number" and give it statistical significance. Then, we run a set of computations and determine a 9.3 and 2.7 value. Then we all argue over the statistics. All the while ignoring the irrelevance of the made up number int he first place!




I'm not kidding. I love this.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
51920 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

We take an arbitrarily assigned "number" and give it statistical significance. Then, we run a set of computations and determine a 9.3 and 2.7 value. Then we all argue over the statistics. All the while ignoring the irrelevance of the made up number int he first place!

That's funny, but the original numbers are not arbitrarily assigned. For example, you'll note that the odds of LSU winning against teams expected to be good are lower than the others.

Do you think any of the single game odds are way off? Arkansas jumps out at me.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

ESPN's Football Power Index Predicts 9-3 Regular Season for LSU


Your post deserves many downvotes. This preseason poll has no credibility...because it does not predict an 11-1 finish.

Posted by ShermanTxTiger
Broussard, La
Member since Oct 2007
11300 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 3:05 pm to
I loved Les but agreed he had to go. (I would have preferred at the end of 2015). Anyway.... does anyone thing we upgraded the coaching?

Posted by OGtigerfan87
North La
Member since Feb 2019
3842 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 3:11 pm to
At this point they are absolutely arbitrary
Posted by LSUERDOC
Member since Jul 2013
2608 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 3:14 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/8/19 at 3:15 pm
Posted by Diesel88
Wyoming
Member since Oct 2018
848 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

Projected W-L: Projected overall W-L, accounting for results to date and FPI-based projections for remaining scheduled games (including potential conference championship games). May not sum to a whole number because of differing number of games played in each simulation.


It helps if you actually try to answer your own question before you ask it. I didn't write the code, but if anyone else need help reading the instructions on the OPs link just LMK.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
51920 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

At this point they are absolutely arbitrary


If so, how do you explain Bama odds being low, GA SO odds being high, etc. They are NOT arbitrary. They are someone's opinion; they might be wrong; but they are NOT arbitrary.
Posted by Diesel88
Wyoming
Member since Oct 2018
848 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

It does show that. Because of chance of SECCG I guess?


Nope. The description below the stats in the link provided literally tell you why it's not a whole number.

quote:

so it would be 9.3 wins and 2.7 losses for regular season


Nope. 9.5 wins 2.8 losses. It also says that in the OPs link. He rounded 9.5 down, which is called truncating and only makes sense in certain rounding situations unlike this one. Point is, this formula is predicting somewhere inbetween 9 and 10 wins for the season.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295194 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

This preseason poll has no credibility...because it does not predict an 11-1 finish.


Did you see the threads about the predictions of 11 wins? Phil Steeles?

What was your opinion of them?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295194 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

Because none of those things are certain


Like all preseason predictions, its nothing but table talk
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216049 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 3:32 pm to
Phil Steele does tons of research. And his mag has a ton of PAST info.... his love for Notre Dame and Ohio State does bother me...... however he does fairness to LSU.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295194 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 3:36 pm to
He's a huge OU homer, doesn't care to much for LSU historically.

But it's just a prediction. All of them are at this point. I would take end of season projections serious until mid October
Posted by J2thaROC
Member since May 2018
14849 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

Even then, it's next man up. That's why you recruit quality depth.


I’m speaking mostly about if Burrow gets injured. There are very few (if any) teams in college football who could have their starting QB go out early in the season and still win 10 games. I’m not even sure Bama could win 10 regular season games is Tua went out for the season in the first couple of games. They would likely lose to us, A&M, Auburn, and possibly one other (who is their other east opponent this year besides Tennessee).
Posted by AlxPin
Member since Jun 2019
462 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 4:02 pm to
Good god man
Posted by HotTakeHerald
Member since Sep 2017
129 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

Nope. The description below the stats in the link provided literally tell you why it's not a whole number.


"(including potential conference championship games). May not sum to a whole number because of differing number of games played in each simulation."

So Yes. They tell you and it is EXACTLY what I conjectured.

quote:

Nope. 9.5 wins 2.8 losses. It also says that in the OPs link. He rounded 9.5 down, which is called truncating and only makes sense in certain rounding situations unlike this one. Point is, this formula is predicting somewhere inbetween 9 and 10 wins for the season.


Again, that includes a bowl game. The description below the stats in the link provided literally tell you that it includes bowl games. The title of the OP literally tells you that he is giving a regular season number.
Posted by Guava Jelly
Bawston
Member since Jul 2009
11943 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Looking at our FPI projection and translating it to an 11-1 projected record is losing the fractional differences that make this tool more information-rich than a blogger slapping a binary prediction (W/L) next to each game on our schedule.


Imputing a season win total based on a series of predictions of discrete events doesn't make a lot of sense to begin with. Whether your solution is 9.5 wins or 11 wins, you're doing it wrong.
This post was edited on 7/8/19 at 4:11 pm
Posted by mhc4tigers
Member since Aug 2016
4534 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 4:16 pm to
The over under on wins is 10.2. Vegas has LSU. 11 and 1.
Posted by mhc4tigers
Member since Aug 2016
4534 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 4:16 pm to
Why do react to this nonsense. Last year was 6 and 6.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram