Started By
Message

re: ESPN will not let the "Foul Ball" Die...

Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:23 pm to
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
87204 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

The player who would have scored scored anyway. I doubt they let the player on first score on a review. It wouldn't have made a difference really.
So it goes from a double to an out and you think it wouldn't have mattered?
Posted by FulshearTiger
Member since Jul 2015
5294 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:24 pm to
He thought Kwan walked also. He had no idea that Kwan recorded an out later in the AB.
Posted by BayouBengal99
Crowley
Member since Oct 2007
9310 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:25 pm to
Omg you're clueless.. The umpire made the call already unless the coach challenges that call they are going to keep it as is period unless of course the home plate umpire saw something clearly different which obviously wasn't the case. Anyway I'm done, got better things to do at this point. Argue away
Posted by FulshearTiger
Member since Jul 2015
5294 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:28 pm to
What am I clueless about exactly? Saying the umpires can initiate a review without a challenge? They can. It happens all the time. You're a fricking moron if you're arguing that.
Posted by 81Tiger
LSU Alumnus
Member since Sep 2009
6830 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:29 pm to
I am boycotting ESPN after Wed
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
69117 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:38 pm to
You didn't see it live. The live camera was blocked by the stands. You saw it in a slow motion replay.

You named everyone not involved in the game anyway. Because a fan watching on TV thought it was fair, and because the announcer commented on the replay, the umpire, who called it foul, should have stopped the game? The third base coach for OSU called it foul as well. You think the ump is going to waste time on what everyone on the field thought was the correct call? I disagree, but I'm certainly biased.

When the coaches have an opportunity to call for a review, it seems to pointless to blame the umpires.
Posted by FulshearTiger
Member since Jul 2015
5294 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:46 pm to
I'm willing to bet money that you don't watch any baseball outside of LSU. They don't even really have full blown replay in college during the regular season. So I'm willing to bet that you don't know much about the baseball replay system and how it works.

You can disagree with my point and that's fine, but the fact of the matter is that the umps very easily could have called for a replay of that call in that moment. I literally saw it happen in a Blue Jays game the other night on a ball that was honestly about 20-25 feet foul. Took them 5 seconds but after one look they realized they got the call right. It happens. All the time.

I am biased as well, but I understand what that the umpires could have easily reviewed it without a challenge. I also realize the OSU coach was dumb for not arguing more to force them to review it.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
69117 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

but the fact of the matter is that the umps very easily could have called for a replay of that call in that moment


I didn't say otherwise. I'm saying I don't necessarily think they should have, other than based on the call being wrong in hindsight. I even added italics to the word should in my first response to you. The fact that they could have initiated the review has not been argued from me. Not once.
Posted by Mulat
Avalon Bch, FL
Member since Sep 2010
17517 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

ESPN
Posted by BayouBengal99
Crowley
Member since Oct 2007
9310 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:53 pm to
This is exactly right. The umpire closest to the action made the call, no one except ESPN said a thing about it. Unless another umpire with a better view then the original umpire saw something different, that original call will and should remain.
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
32731 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:55 pm to
quote:


I am biased as well, but I understand what that the umpires could have easily reviewed it without a challenge. I also realize the OSU coach was dumb for not arguing more to force them to review it.

Everyone on the field thought it was foul. Dups, OSU's 3rd base coach, the umps. No one is going to call for a review of a play that everyone in the field agrees 100% was correct.

How hard is that to comprehend?
Posted by BayouBengal99
Crowley
Member since Oct 2007
9310 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

I'm willing to bet money that you don't watch any baseball outside of LSU. They don't even really have full blown replay in college during the regular season. So I'm willing to bet that you don't know much about the baseball replay system and how


I don't see how this helps your argument? You just admitted that the two replay systems are different and is more advanced in pro ball in which case they may have looked at it in pro ball. This is college though. These umpires have been close to pro ball I'll give it that. I'm really pleased with how the games are being called so for. I don't think ESPN biased should come into play in our college game and that's basically what we have here.
Posted by Barbellthor
Columbia
Member since Aug 2015
10920 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 2:14 pm to
Not even a baseball fan, but...

Let's say that gets the double. They score a point, man on second. We walked three more, they still lose 3-2 or whatever.

It's foul. We walk three, and they still lose 3-1. Thanks, k, bye.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram