Started By
Message

EDIT: NCAA Rulebook explains why INT return was a (EDIT 2) Mess

Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:08 pm
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
136831 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:08 pm
"Ball carrier A33 is running toward the Team B goal line. He drops the ball just inside the one-yard line and, thinking he has scored a touchdown, circles through the end zone and runs to his team area. There is no touchdown signal by any official. The fumbled ball hits the ground just outside or just inside the goal line, rolls along the ground in the end zone, and is declared dead there when it comes to rest and no player attempts to recover it. RULING: Touchdown. The ball belongs
to the team last in possession at the dead-ball spot. By definition an awarded fumble in the opponent’s end zone is a touchdown. (Rule 7-2-5)"

Found on Page 45 of the Rulebook


Rule 7, Section 2, Article 4, Subpart c

c. Behind or Beyond Goal Line. When a fumble or backward pass goes out of bounds behind or beyond a goal line, it is a safety or touchback depending on impetus and responsibility
(Rules 8-5-1, 8-6-1 and 8-7) (A.R. 7-2-4-I,
A.R. 8-6-1-I and A.R. 8-7-2-I).

Now to "impetus and responsibility". We have a rule for that.

Rule 8, Section 7, Article 1

"The team responsible for the ball being out of bounds behind a goal line or being dead in the possession of a player on, above or behind a goal
line is the team whose player carries the ball or imparts an impetus to it that forces it on, above or across the goal line, or is responsible for a loose ball being on, above or behind the goal line."

and Article 2, Subpart a

"The impetus imparted by a player who kicks, passes, snaps or fumbles the ball shall be considered responsible for the ball’s progress in
any direction
even though its course is deflected or reversed after striking the ground or after touching an official or a player of either team"
This post was edited on 1/1/14 at 7:48 pm
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
45166 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:10 pm to
There ya go
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
53854 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:13 pm to
Another reason this was the shittiest officiating crew I've seen in a looooong time.
Posted by House_of Cards
Pascagoula, MS
Member since Dec 2013
3927 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:13 pm to
I don't see how it is possible to field a ball in play and then retreat to your own goalline and then have a touchback. I do not believe that is the correct methodology.

I mean, why would they gain 20 yards for their penalty?
This post was edited on 1/1/14 at 6:15 pm
Posted by lillian axe
Houston
Member since Oct 2013
37 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:14 pm to
23-7 final
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20446 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:14 pm to
The "incomplete pass" non fumble was another terrible call.
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
53854 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:15 pm to
I think he's talking about the "pick six" fumble.
Posted by blackjackjackson
fourth dimension
Member since May 2008
7674 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:17 pm to
didn't iowa also fumble, lsu recovered, but the refs just gave it back to iowa!!!
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
136831 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

I think he's talking about the "pick six" fumble.

correct
This post was edited on 1/1/14 at 6:23 pm
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62462 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

The "incomplete pass" non fumble was another terrible call.


This..There just wasn't enough to overturn the call, and I would say that if it was first ruled an incomplete pass....either call should have stood with what was called on the field...His forward motion was all empty hand.
Posted by DaBike
Member since Jan 2008
9199 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

Behind or Beyond Goal Line. When a fumble or backward pass goes out of bounds behind or beyond a goal line, it is a safety or touchback depending on impetus and responsibility
(Rules 8-5-1, 8-6-1 and 8-7) (A.R. 7-2-4-I,
A.R. 8-6-1-I and A.R. 8-7-2-I).


Is a key part of this that the ball goes out of bounds? The ball never went out of bounds and no one picked it up when it was laying there…..
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
136831 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:21 pm to
quote:

DaBike
you make a very good point
Posted by House_of Cards
Pascagoula, MS
Member since Dec 2013
3927 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:21 pm to
I'm sorry.
Posted by The Eric
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2008
20996 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:22 pm to
This happened in the TCU Texas tech game and was called as a touchback and given to the other team.

Posted by blackjackjackson
fourth dimension
Member since May 2008
7674 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

Is a key part of this that the ball goes out of bounds? The ball never went out of bounds and no one picked it up when it was laying there…..


that is what I understand. IF lsu had jumped on it, it would have been a touchback and lsu's ball on the 20.
Posted by noonan
Nassau Bay, TX
Member since Aug 2005
36903 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:22 pm to
This rule is talking about the ball going out of bounds though, right?

Eta: I see it's already been mentioned.
This post was edited on 1/1/14 at 6:24 pm
Posted by geauxjo
Gonzales, LA
Member since Sep 2004
14750 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:24 pm to
It didn't go out of bounds though. It simply remained uncovered in the end zone. Therefore the team who fumbled was awarded the ball on the 1.

Edit: I really should read a post more thoroughly before saying what 3 people already said.
This post was edited on 1/1/14 at 6:26 pm
Posted by tjtiger9
MS
Member since Aug 2005
3845 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:25 pm to
The ball was never recovered, thus going back to the place of the fumble by the runner. The refs did get that call correct. The previous Iowa fumble and forward pass call, they did not get correct
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
45166 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

that is what I understand. IF lsu had jumped on it, it would have been a touchback and lsu's ball on the 20.


This is correct and if Iowa had jumped on it it would have been a TD. None of this explains why the Refs blew a play dead when the ball was live and clearly in bounds and live and not in possession of a player from either team. We see this from time to time on screen passes or bubble screens when the pass is a lateral and not a forward pass. The players from one or both teams think the ball is incomplete when in fact it is actually live. I can't recall which game it was but this just happened in the last week or so and a player pick it up and ran it for a TD. The fact that is being overlooked is that the play should have never been blown dead.
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
53854 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:33 pm to
As a human, I would've probably blown the whistle, too. It was not even something I considered until they started showing the replay.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram