- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Detillier just destroyed Canada's offense
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:19 pm to FutureRATeammember
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:19 pm to FutureRATeammember
quote:this is correct.
It's because canada doesn't run anything creative out of the shifts. He just moves guys around to run basic plays
0
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:22 pm to magildachunks
quote:
Canada's "system" didn't fool good defenses. Just a fact.
We were pretty much even with Alabama offensively in their place. Missed on deep balls that were available.
You and mike D are wrong
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:23 pm to magildachunks
I disagree. I think Canada's offense was based on getting more players to one side of the ball and outnumbering the defense. There's times you'll catch them outnumbered, (fora nice gain) and times where they don't take the bait. Kinda like the wishbone. Stop it, stop it, stop it and then boom the back is off to the races.
O wants a pro style, pocket passer, two back offense like Southern Cal hay days.
O wants a pro style, pocket passer, two back offense like Southern Cal hay days.
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:25 pm to FightinTiga
I hope so cause his name is on the next OC hire just like it was for the last one. He should be held accountable for it
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:27 pm to km
quote:
I disagree. I think Canada's offense was based on getting more players to one side of the ball and outnumbering the defense. There's times you'll catch them outnumbered, (fora nice gain) and times where they don't take the bait. Kinda like the wishbone. Stop it, stop it, stop it and then boom the back is off to the races.
But we got that, and more of it, last year.
How many 200+ games by a back last year?
This post was edited on 1/4/18 at 8:27 pm
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:34 pm to therick711
quote:thank you. and I'd add that sometimes is was to create favorable blocking situations without changing formation. In those cases, the read is the same as reading the FB. Except he was in motion across the face and it could be anywhere along motion direction. Causes mis-steps, sometimes more favorable angles for OL.
The shifts are in service of the reads, they largely aren't used to fool a defense. To be clear, there are some shifts that are for decoy or deceptive purposes, but the garden variety shifting is to help the offense with their reads.
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:38 pm to magildachunks
quote:
Opposing teams, when the line would do their shifts, you could hear them yelling to each other to stay where they were. It was all window dressing.
Oh yeah. And when the defense stayed put, we never changed the play toward the shift.
This is the stupidest thing MD has ever said.
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:38 pm to slackster
I agree with you on all that but Canada still works for O and the head coach still has the final say. I know many on here say “he is supposed to let the coaches coach” I think they take that to mean the HC doesn’t have any say so in how the program is run and input on gameplans...that is impossible to have the head coach has to have the ultimate power. I will wait to see who we hire...hell maybe we will all be thrilled. If it’s ensminger the melt will be bad .
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:40 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
I will wait to see who we hire...hell maybe we will all be thrilled. If it’s ensminger the melt will be bad .
Looking like little Briles.
Kiffin pimping his boy to LSU
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:42 pm to I20goon
quote:
thank you. and I'd add that sometimes is was to create favorable blocking situations without changing formation. In those cases, the read is the same as reading the FB. Except he was in motion across the face and it could be anywhere along motion direction. Causes mis-steps, sometimes more favorable angles for OL.
i dont think ive ever disagreed with one of your posts
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:43 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
Ed playing dirty pool by sending his minions to make Matt look like the bad guy
I don't care about dirty pool or stuff like that. But I just hope like hell this isn't trying to throw dirt on Canada to lesson the impact of if they try to pull an Ensminger hire.
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:43 pm to OceanMan
quote:
We were pretty much even with Alabama offensively in their place. Missed on deep balls that were available.
You and mike D are wrong
because Bama didnt need to. we never got closer than down 2 possessions after the 1st quarter. there was no need for bama to risk anything on offense.
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:46 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Rickdaddy, if we could find a way to magically and instantaneously replace Alleva with Herb Vincent, we'd forever be eligible for $0.50 corndogs.
Otherwise, we both just keep fighting the good fight, as we each see it.
Otherwise, we both just keep fighting the good fight, as we each see it.
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:49 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:Rick is right about this. The stats of that game were misleading because Bama was comfortably ahead early and played very conservatively. If the game had been closer, we'd have seen more offensive production from them. But they didn't need it.
because Bama didnt need to. we never got closer than down 2 possessions after the 1st quarter. there was no need for bama to risk anything on offense.
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:50 pm to magildachunks
Shouldn’t everyone be happy with Briles?
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:57 pm to nola000
Mike D is clueless.
Posted on 1/4/18 at 9:19 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
Shouldn’t everyone be happy with Briles?
Yes they should.
Very happy.
ETA: Sark too if it should happen
This post was edited on 1/4/18 at 9:20 pm
Posted on 1/4/18 at 9:22 pm to magildachunks
So your saying we we moved a tackle to an offset line other teams would react to that?
Moving players changes assignments.
defensive assignments are based on formation. You can’t just “not move”
Moving players changes assignments.
defensive assignments are based on formation. You can’t just “not move”
Posted on 1/4/18 at 9:27 pm to TigerFan4040
quote:
Haha im surreee it was just that simple.
Honestly, it just changes your gap assignments as a DL. It wasn't much of a change, but he was trying to make defenses think of their assignments instead of just being ready to react and play football.
Posted on 1/4/18 at 9:34 pm to magildachunks
Pre-snap motions to nowhere offense.
Page 7 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News