Started By
Message

David Pollack has us as the #1 team in the country, "And it's not even close."

Posted on 10/19/19 at 2:11 am
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35274 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 2:11 am
LINK

Galloway has us at #2. Both giving Alabama the edge in a home game for them, which is understandable. I feel like Pollack has been all over the place, but cool to see him put us at #1 atm. SIAP
This post was edited on 10/19/19 at 2:14 am
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
35541 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 2:16 am to
Kind of surprised because he usually doesn't care for LSU too much.

I'm glad we are getting the respect, but I hope the team doesn't let it get to their heads. Things can change very easily in the next month if this team lets up any. Thankfully, with the leaders on this team, I don't see that really being a problem. With guys like Burrow and Cush, I think they stay hungry.
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35274 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 2:37 am to
We need a 6-8 team playoff bottom line. This is getting out of control.

LINK

Pollack, Kirby, Galloway, and Palmer are all discussing this year. Between LSU, Alabama, OSU, OU, Clemson, and Wisky, these teams have all been legit. The good thing is, LSU plays Bama, and OSU plays Wisky. It just kinda sucks that we have to play a playoff game in the regular season. This is all fixed with a 8 team playoff.
Posted by la_birdman
Lake Charles
Member since Feb 2005
31014 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 2:39 am to
quote:

The good thing is, LSU plays Bama, and OSU plays Wisky. It just kinda sucks that we have to play a playoff game in the regular season. This is all fixed with a 8 team playoff.



Great point. I mean I guess if you HAD to stick to 4 teams in the playoffs, you'd have to consider their SOS. I will say tOSU has looked strong but it's easy to look like that when you're playing nobodies or teams that aren't as strong as they typically are (e.g. Michigan State) Nebraska was ranked, but barely.


It's the same thing with Alabama, beat up on a bunch of smaller schools or teams that aren't that great (Arkansas, Tennessee, Ole Miss). But it doesn't help your strength of schedule.


Anyway, I'm ready to watch the Tigers tomorrow. Worry about all this other 'what if' stuff later.
This post was edited on 10/19/19 at 2:44 am
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35274 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 2:43 am to
Playoff games are played on a neutral site. But we have to go to Tuscaloosa to play Bama to decide the playoff. Just because it's their year to host. It just doesn't make sense IMO.
Posted by la_birdman
Lake Charles
Member since Feb 2005
31014 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 2:47 am to
quote:

Playoff games are played on a neutral site


Yes they are.



quote:

But we have to go to Tuscaloosa to play Bama to decide the playoff. Just because it's their year to host. It just doesn't make sense IMO.




No it doesn't. I completely agree.


I think the first playoff rankings come out the first weekend in November. We'll see where we are.
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
35541 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 4:02 am to
quote:

We need a 6-8 team playoff bottom line. This is getting out of control.
No doubt. I thought it should have been 8 from the beginning. Some will say it'll work itself out during the season, but even some of the best college football teams have 1 loss at the end of the year. 4 teams only is ridiculous, especially considering if all P5 conferences had an undefeated champion, you couldn't even put them all in. That's unlikely, but it very well could happen to where we have all p5 conferences with champions that are undefeated or with 1 loss. Then, what do you do? Sure, as it sits now, with the pac12 being so weak, you could keep them out, but if their champ is undefeated why should they be kept out? I think 8 is the perfect number for major college football playoffs.
This post was edited on 10/19/19 at 4:04 am
Posted by SofaKingTrill
Member since Mar 2008
6830 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 4:25 am to
quote:

No doubt. I thought it should have been 8 from the beginning. Some will say it'll work itself out during the season, but even some of the best college football teams have 1 loss at the end of the year. 4 teams only is ridiculous, especially considering if all P5 conferences had an undefeated champion, you couldn't even put them all in. That's unlikely, but it very well could happen to where we have all p5 conferences with champions that are undefeated or with 1 loss. Then, what do you do? Sure, as it sits now, with the pac12 being so weak, you could keep them out, but if their champ is undefeated why should they be kept out? I think 8 is the perfect number for major college football playoffs.

That would take 3 playoff game wins to win a national championship. To make that happen conferences would likely have to drop their championship game. It would be a pain in the arse to reformat the conference scheduling wise and it would be a major loss of money in advertising dollars for the SEC based on the ratings they bring in airing the championship game. There's a lot more to think about than just switching it to 8 teams.
Posted by Solo Cam
Member since Sep 2015
32644 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 4:53 am to
I respect his ability to set his bias aside.
Posted by Bayou
CenLA
Member since Feb 2005
36830 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:10 am to
Beating Alabama in their house will be bigger than beating them at home. Welcome this opportunity. Watch their fans wilt.
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
35541 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:13 am to
They could just drop 1 of the 3-4 cupcake games each P5 team plays each year. No one wants to watch LSU beat up on Whatever directional state U anyways.
Posted by rbdallas
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2007
10340 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:18 am to
quote:

Beating Alabama in their house will be bigger than beating them at home. Welcome this opportunity. Watch their fans wilt.



Could it be ?

a PIGS FLY OVER ALABAMA GAME ? again....
Posted by ecb
Member since Jul 2010
9348 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:29 am to
Stop jinxing us baw
Posted by tigersquad89
Raleigh, NC
Member since Oct 2014
7897 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:36 am to
A lot of people on here act like pollack and the rest of the gameday crew hate LSU because they criticize them. Have any of you thought that in past years LSU just didn’t show them enough to be considered the best team in the country? Now LSU is actually showing that and this is the respect they have earned. The entire world isn’t against LSU.
Posted by Nix to Twillie
Houston, TX
Member since Jan 2015
17770 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:37 am to
quote:

he usually doesn't care for LSU too much.


Posted by Mulat
Avalon Bch, FL
Member since Sep 2010
17517 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:40 am to
quote:

This is all fixed with a 8 team playoff.


I would rather see 16 team playoff.

1. Get rid of Rent a Wins

2. Shorten regular season, conference and Division opponents only.

3. No play off in conference

4. Include more conferences in playoof

5. Change Bowls to playoffs, making them relevant again

6. Start bowls earlier to make all this work out

my 2 cents
This post was edited on 10/19/19 at 6:42 am
Posted by Nix to Twillie
Houston, TX
Member since Jan 2015
17770 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:41 am to
quote:

A lot of people on here act like pollack and the rest of the gameday crew hate LSU because they criticize them. Have any of you thought that in past years LSU just didn’t show them enough to be considered the best team in the country? Now LSU is actually showing that and this is the respect they have earned. The entire world isn’t against LSU.


Posted by Reasonable227
Member since Oct 2019
700 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:41 am to
Think about it in terms of the NFL playoffs. Do you think the teams with 4 best records always win the Superbowl? A lot of times, yes. But, not always. It is very possible that a team could play the #1 team during the season, lose, and still realistically be the second best team, and miss the playoffs. College football is much more subjective than the NFL, too. Not all schedules are equal. In fact, there are much bigger discrepancies in college schedules, than in NFL. Simply look at Clemson. Texas A&M may actually be their toughest game. Eight team playoff would eliminate that.
This post was edited on 10/19/19 at 6:49 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98860 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 7:31 am to
quote:

I'm glad we are getting the respect, but I hope the team doesn't let it get to their heads


O and Joe ain't gonna let that happen
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
29391 posts
Posted on 10/19/19 at 8:30 am to
I like the idea of a six team. Top two seeds get a “bye”. Most years, 6 teams covers everyone that has a legitimate shot. Honestly, 4 covers most years. But 6 gives you options to not penalize the top teams for playing each other (like LSU/Bama or Wisky/Ohio St) assuming that’s their only loss.

What I really hope is this encourages teams to play good OOC games. Something bothers me about Clemson and the joke of that conference. That doesn’t mean they aren’t a quality team, but a quality team that doesn’t get tested all year has a definite advantage over a team like us in getting to the playoff healthy and ready.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram