- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Damn. People really bought into that 5 second video that his attorney released lmao
Posted on 10/7/25 at 2:39 pm to ChineseBandit58
Posted on 10/7/25 at 2:39 pm to ChineseBandit58
He crossed double lines, and fled the incident, didn’t render aid. By definition, he was indirectly involved in the incident and ran. And obviously speeding as you stated. That’s the definition of hit and run causing death since someone died.
0
Posted on 10/7/25 at 2:46 pm to Tzanghi
quote:
No one’s disagreeing on that. That point is just not worth anything. The Big Bang has caused every crime that’s ever been committed. That doesn’t make it culpable lol.
Don't be dumb.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 2:46 pm to lsufanva
Again you say chain of events, but it isn’t a changing of accidents.
You can drive negligently without causing damages.
The question isn’t did Lacy cause the truck to break.
It’s, did lacy cause a situation where it would be reasonable for a safe and prudent driver to have to swerve into oncoming traffic
It’s pretty clear the answer is no, because the gold truck was able to avoid him. The gold truck was closer to Lacy and they weren’t even close to an impact.
The reason your aren’t supposed to pass on busy roads it to avoided on collisions. Not because down the road someone might not be paying attention to traffic ahead and could rear end someone.
The reason your not supposed to follow to close it so you have time to safely break without hitting the car in front of you or having to leave your lane.
You can drive negligently without causing damages.
The question isn’t did Lacy cause the truck to break.
It’s, did lacy cause a situation where it would be reasonable for a safe and prudent driver to have to swerve into oncoming traffic
It’s pretty clear the answer is no, because the gold truck was able to avoid him. The gold truck was closer to Lacy and they weren’t even close to an impact.
The reason your aren’t supposed to pass on busy roads it to avoided on collisions. Not because down the road someone might not be paying attention to traffic ahead and could rear end someone.
The reason your not supposed to follow to close it so you have time to safely break without hitting the car in front of you or having to leave your lane.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 3:00 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
But Lacy took his own life probably because he got into a heated argument with his sister in Houston, pulled a gun and shot a round, then fled from the police. Now, the city he grew up in is being railroaded by idiots that believed all the lies from some two-bit fame whore ambulance chaser.
fify
Posted on 10/7/25 at 3:02 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
Lacy was probably guilty of speeding - but not the cause of the accident - and not within a half mile of the accident
Lacy may well have had too much to drink - but that was not a factor in the accident because nothing Lacy did had any effect on what the dim-wit female driver did who caused the accident.
But Lacy took his own life probably because he thought he was going to get railroaded by idiots that believed all the lies.
Good Lord. It makes me concerned that I have to share oxygen with some of you.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 3:11 pm to RB10
quote:
Why did she have to avoid that first accident again?
Because she was speeding, tailgating, and eating Funyuns from her lap. She impaired herself from being able to safely operate her vehicle in the case of the truck in front of her slowing down to a little below the speed limit.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 3:15 pm to TigerGrad03
quote:
Because she was speeding, tailgating, and eating Funyuns from her lap. She impaired herself from being able to safely operate her vehicle in the case of the truck in front of her slowing down to a little below the speed limit.
Let's not be disingenuous, the truck didn't just "slow down a little bit".
The truck braked and pulled halfway off of the road to avoid an oncoming vehicle.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 3:16 pm to Tzanghi
quote:
Lmao are we in 1st grade?
It's all I've got for you at this point. Your assertion that nothing Lacy did impacted the wreck when every eyewitness accounts says the exact opposite if willful ignorance or plain stupidity.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 3:16 pm to KiaSportage22
Posted on 10/7/25 at 3:19 pm to RB10
He slowed down to 28 mph in a 35mph zone and pulled to the right at the time she swerved and went from 49 mph to crash in roughly 1 second.
This is the findings of the DA's investigation that was shared by Lacy's defense attorney. It's not his findings, it's the potential prosecution's own independent investigation.
We can agree that Lacy caused the truck to slow down. You can see in the video that the driver said he didn't skid or lock up his brakes. You can see the black box info for both vehicles in the interview because they show the report prepared by the DA.
This is the findings of the DA's investigation that was shared by Lacy's defense attorney. It's not his findings, it's the potential prosecution's own independent investigation.
We can agree that Lacy caused the truck to slow down. You can see in the video that the driver said he didn't skid or lock up his brakes. You can see the black box info for both vehicles in the interview because they show the report prepared by the DA.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 3:23 pm to TigerGrad03
quote:
He slowed down to 28 mph in a 35mph zone and pulled to the right at the time she swerved and went from 49 mph to crash in roughly 1 second.
It's a 40 MPH zone.
quote:
This is the findings of the DA's investigation that was shared by Lacy's defense attorney. It's not his findings, it's the potential prosecution's own independent investigation.
Yes the DA was still investigating.
quote:
We can agree that Lacy caused the truck to slow down. You can see in the video that the driver said he didn't skid or lock up his brakes. You can see the black box info for both vehicles in the interview because they show the report prepared by the DA.
Lacy 100% caused the truck to slow down and leave the road. The driver was interviewed on a body cam.
The woman was not paying attention and got into a wreck. She carries blame for that, BUT WHAT IS ALSO TRUE is that Lacy was driving extremely recklessly (not up for debate as its on video) and also caused the wreck.
Both can be, and are true.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 3:26 pm to RB10
You clearly haven’t read what I’ve written then because that’s not what I said.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 3:28 pm to RB10
quote:I'm not 100% on this. The woman was doing close to 50 mph according to the portions of the DA's investigation that Mr. Ory released. The crash occurred more than 100 yards beyond a 40 mph speed limit sign she had passed, and the truck in front of her was doing about 30 mph. If, then, she isn't reacting to Lacy being in her lane, then it seems her swerving is due to her own negligence because she did not give herself enough time and/or space to react to the vehicle in front of her. I am not a lawyer, so this makes it difficult for me to determine overall fault.
Did she swerve into oncoming traffic to avoid the truck because of the Dodge Challenger? Yes.
We need to see the DA's full report (with private information redacted) to understand what happened. The woman who hit Mr. Hall lied about her speed, so her statements are questionable. The state trooper apparently tried to adjust a witness's statement, (which the witness refused to sign) which hurts the integrity of his investigation. Mr. Ory has released selective information from the report to support his defense while leaving the rest on the cutting room floor. The most objective source may be the full DA investigation report, or at least it can provide more information.
Speaking of information, did the donut shop or the Dollar General not have security cameras that could've caught the incident? We don't have any released videos properly showing the accident, let alone the other lane of traffic.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 3:28 pm to RB10
Lacy is guilty. Case closed. Saved tax payers money. Kid was messed up. Rip
Posted on 10/7/25 at 3:31 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
and not within a half mile of the accident
In what world is 75 yards half a mile
Physics says it take less than 2.5 seconds to travel that far at a speed exceeding 70 MPH which tape shows this is evident with regards to KL. Posted on 10/7/25 at 3:31 pm to Omada
quote:
I'm not 100% on this. The woman was doing close to 50 mph according to the portions of the DA's investigation that Mr. Ory released. The crash occurred more than 100 yards beyond a 40 mph speed limit sign she had passed, and the truck in front of her was doing about 30 mph. If, then, she isn't reacting to Lacy being in her lane, then it seems her swerving is due to her own negligence because she did not give herself enough time and/or space to react to the vehicle in front of her. I am not a lawyer, so this makes it difficult for me to determine overall fault.
The driver of the truck is on video saying he slowed down and pulled to the side to avoid a car coming "head on".
quote:
We need to see the DA's full report (with private information redacted) to understand what happened. The woman who hit Mr. Hall lied about her speed, so her statements are questionable. The state trooper apparently tried to adjust a witness's statement, (which the witness refused to sign) which hurts the integrity of his investigation. Mr. Ory has released selective information from the report to support his defense while leaving the rest on the cutting room floor. The most objective source may be the full DA investigation report, or at least it can provide more information.
Ah yes, everyone is corrupt and Lacy was railroaded.
Let's just ignore the driver who said he had to pull over to avoid a head on collision with a reckless driver and the dozen or so people who gave eyewitness accounts that a "green charger" caused the accident.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 3:32 pm to TigerGrad03
Not trying to argue at all. Just wondering what the source is for the “distraction with funyuns” claim.
Because all I can find is the defense claim.
Because all I can find is the defense claim.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 3:32 pm to KiaSportage22
quote:
Damn. People really bought into that 5 second video that his attorney released lmao
Only racists.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 3:33 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Only racists.
Eh. It's mostly LSU fans who don't want to view things objectively.
Most of them likely defend the running backs who were run off too.
Page 4 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News