- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
D. White might want to consider seeking injunctive relief:
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:18 pm
LINK / Not sure why he'd be prohibited from exploring this legal remedy? Not being allowed to play 50% of the biggest game in his short college career would seemingly damage him irreparably; and, this suspension is solely being based on a largely subjective interpretation of an exclusively objective rules violation. He is also being deprived of any appeals process. I hope he gives this legal option some strong consideration! Paging Mr Jackson, Mr Don Jackson... 
11
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:19 pm to LSUJJP
quote:
Not being allowed to play 50% of the biggest game in his short college career would seemingly damage him irreparably
I just stopped right here. Missing 30 minutes of game action is going to erase 3 years of film?
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:20 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
just stopped right here. Missing 30 minutes of game action is going to erase 3 years of film?
This. Injury would be tough to prove.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:22 pm to LSUJJP
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:27 pm to LSUJJP
Move. On.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:28 pm to LSUJJP
We need an injunction against your posts.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:31 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
I just stopped right here. Missing 30 minutes of game action is going to erase 3 years of film?
Set aside that thought for a minute, which is very rational.
What if he filed it say at 3 PM next Friay before a friendly federal judge who granted it. The SEC would have no time to respond so the injunction is in place.
Would LSU run any risk by playing Devin in the first half?
Could the SEC vacate an LSU win if that occurred if the injunction was overturned the following week?
Most of the national sentiment seems to be with White or at least against Alabama privelege. Any such action by the league to set aside the injunction would not be good optics.
By not seeking to overturn the league could get out of a non winnable PR position if they just leave it in the hands of the court.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:31 pm to Guava Jelly
quote:
This. Injury would be tough to prove.
Would it though? Look at what the Bama game to LF.
Being able to excel in this game is different than excelling in any other game. Alabama is, and is seen to be THE test, no?
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:34 pm to novabill
quote:
Would it though? Look at what the Bama game to LF.
He went 4th overall.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:35 pm to LSUJJP
I would freaking love it if he got legal representation and sued the SEC offices.
He could have wipe the floor with that QB, instead he pulled back and barely hits him with his hands. Only one person in America thought it was targeting. Well, him and the Bama grad reviewing the film.
He could have wipe the floor with that QB, instead he pulled back and barely hits him with his hands. Only one person in America thought it was targeting. Well, him and the Bama grad reviewing the film.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:35 pm to LSUJJP
Beat Bama!!!
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:37 pm to LSUJJP
Maybe White has accepted the ruling and is ok with it?
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:38 pm to LSUJJP
quote:
Not being allowed to play 50% of the biggest game in his short college career would seemingly damage him irreparably
Wow this is beyond retarded
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:43 pm to chinhoyang
quote:apply here
We need an injunction against your posts.
quote:
tigerdroppings@gmail.com.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:47 pm to novabill
quote:
Would it though? Look at what the Bama game to LF.
What exactly did it do to him? Last I checked he was still a top 5 draft pick.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:49 pm to airfernando
The problem with this whole mess is that these calls are SUBJECTIVE to the refs view so there should be an appeal/review process when something is subjective and can be harmful to the recipient as well as the school.
Diff between a win and a loss can be millions of dollars for each one.
Diff between a win and a loss can be millions of dollars for each one.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 2:14 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
Not being allowed to play 50% of the biggest game in his short college career would seemingly damage him irreparably
Wow this is beyond retarded
Ever take a looka t dome of the court filings for injunctive relief? Many of them have no grounding in reality but if they can get before a court sympathetic totheir cause hey at least get temporary injuncitve relief. Thats all that is needed here.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 3:07 pm to rbdallas
I agree. Theres no need to have calls go to a 3rd party unless they have implications on the next game.
This is bullshite and unfair.
If it were a huge brawl, the office would dissect the film the next week and hand out penalties, or remove penalties from uninvolved players.
This is bullshite and unfair.
If it were a huge brawl, the office would dissect the film the next week and hand out penalties, or remove penalties from uninvolved players.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 3:15 pm to novabill
quote:
Alabama is, and is seen to be THE test, no?
No. He can and will still get first round money. Because he doesn't get paid it would be impossible to prove actual (or even incidental) damages.
Hell, even guys who sit out half the season still get first round money.
IF (big if) there were any kind of suit, the university would have to bring it.
This post was edited on 10/23/18 at 3:19 pm
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News