Started By
Message

re: Crews a bust?

Posted on 6/10/25 at 7:12 am to
Posted by BeesWax
Member since Mar 2025
58 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 7:12 am to
His stance has changed from college and the minors. The current one appears to make him more ready to hit big league pitching.
Posted by Ranger Call
Lonesome Dove / Montana
Member since Apr 2023
453 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 7:15 am to
quote:

Wyatt Langford


As someone that has watched almost every Rangers game this year, I can tell you that Wyatt has had his lunch money taken on a LOT of at bats. MLB pitching is unlike any other thing on this earth...you can't take for granted just how good and nasty those dudes are. Langford is all go go go, and it is fun to watch, he is and will be a stud. But he has had terrible stretches as well.

Crews and Langford will both play in multiple all-star games. Not everyone comes out looking like Juan Soto right away.
Posted by Skenes
Member since Mar 2025
156 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 7:15 am to
quote:

ou remember how Alex Bregman started? Dude had a historically bad start to his MLB career and Crews got to the show faster.
you mean his first 6 games? His rookie season (49 games) he hit .264/.313/..478. Crews would love those numbers at this point.
Posted by Tiger Ugly
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
16688 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 7:21 am to
Absolutely too early.

For example Matt Shaw with the Cubs started the season in the majors, he was a first round pick for the Cubs, not as high a pick as Crews but he was one of the Cub's top prospects and rose up through the ranks quickly. This was his first taste of the major and his first 70 at bats did not go well.

Sent him down and brought him back a month later and in about in the 17 games since being back up he's hitting .327.

I could give you dozens of other examples, but Shaw is one - he's talented - but Crews is more talented. Give it some time.
Posted by HC87
Coastal NC
Member since Dec 2014
5223 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 7:25 am to
He obviously has a more severe obligue strain than initially diagnosed. He was coming around and having some better games at the plate. From everything I had read he was fielding his position well in the OF. At the major league level, it is a constant game of adjustments. Look at W. Langford batting .227 and he has been playing full time since last season.

I believe a healthy D. Crews will be back and prove he is one of the better young OF's across MLB.
Posted by Solo Cam
Member since Sep 2015
34132 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 7:40 am to
quote:

you mean his first 6 games? His rookie season (49 games) he hit .264/.313/..478. Crews would love those numbers at this point.
It took him 6 games to get his first hit.

It took him 22 games to get above .200

Crews hit .247 in May with 5 HRs and 20 RBIs

You fahgots are the exact same ones who gave up on Jones and Shores this season.

I'll say the exact same thing about Bregman as I did about Jared Jones- his talent is undeniable. I'll bet on him and bookmark this thread
Posted by GeauxtigersMs36
The coast
Member since Jan 2018
11566 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 7:48 am to
Plenty of guys start hot and then struggle, start slow then get hot. Using the word bust in baseball after 60 games isn’t right. Has he struggled adjusting? Yes but as we saw in Baton Rouge crews works hard at his craft… he will figure it out.
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
17138 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 7:49 am to
quote:

Alex Bregman


quote:

hall of fame career


We can say Bregman has had a solid MLB career without jumping to this

MLB HoF is ridiculously hard to get into.
Posted by Froman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
37700 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 8:13 am to
Based on subsequent comments, it’s obvious OP is just trolling, but I am very impressed with all the responses in this thread. LSU fans know baseball better than anyone.
Posted by Solo Cam
Member since Sep 2015
34132 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 8:34 am to
quote:

We can say Bregman has had a solid MLB career without jumping to this

MLB HoF is ridiculously hard to get into.
I exaggerated but he's a good glove winner, multiple time all star, World Series champion.

But I member dudes on this board calling him a bust right when he started his MLB career too.

I remember him going on with Mascona and that bitches first question to him was "why did you suck early?"

Bregman sounded legitimately confused like "I gave you this interview motherfricker snd you're going to insult me"
Posted by Skenes
Member since Mar 2025
156 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 8:49 am to
Crews had played in more games than Bregman, so obviously bigger sample size when you are talking 6 games. It took Bregman to get to .200 and after that he never sniffed .200 again that season. Crews is 70+ games into his career. Still to early to say bust but Corbin Carroll, Jackson Merrill and others have raised expectations for many of these young players.
Also when did Crews hit .247 with 5 home runs in May? He hit .167 with 3 home runs. For his career his best month is August (5 games played) where he hit .286/.318/.667 outside of that he hasn't hit over .215 for his career over any month.

What Crews has on his side is that he is a plus defender with speed and pop. When he comes back from IL (he isn't swinging a bat yet) he will be back in the lineup as Hassell and Young haven't lit the world on fire and Crews offers more pop than either.
This post was edited on 6/10/25 at 9:14 am
Posted by IM_4_LSU
Savannah, GA
Member since Mar 2014
10016 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 9:16 am to
quote:


Almost a month and he still hasn't even begun baseball activities? Most sportswriters are saying he just wasn't ready for MLB.


The dude is injured. He actually has been playing very well defensively and was just starting to find his groove offensively. He was improving. It takes time to adjust to MLB pitching.

This should not even be a question right now. Hes injured and when he is recovered he will resume baseball activities. Jesus
Posted by JimTiger72
Member since Jun 2023
12073 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 9:19 am to
quote:

He was improving. It takes time to adjust to MLB pitching.


That’s an understatement. He was leading all rookies with 7 HRs at the time & he had just hit one 2 games in a row.

OP is just an uninformed troll. It’s not a coincidence he signed up for a TD account on 6/21/23 as we eliminated Wake Forest
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
42022 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 9:24 am to
quote:

He's a below average player on a horrible team. He won't see the majors again.

Oh, so you're a troll from a different fan base. Got it.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
47525 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 9:27 am to
quote:

He's a below average player on a horrible team. He won't see the majors again.




Couldn’t even make it two pages before outing yourself.
Posted by bstaceyau19
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2022
672 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 9:30 am to
quote:

Know who else struggled when they first got into the Bigs?

Adrian Beltre
Robin Yount
Johnny Bench
Cal Ripken Jr
George Brett
Reggie Jackson

As mentioned, baseball is hard as frick. Not every 18-22 year old has the light go on for them immediately. Btw, all those guys are in the HoF now but I'm sure you knew that.


Add Mickey Mantle to that list.
Posted by IM_4_LSU
Savannah, GA
Member since Mar 2014
10016 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 9:33 am to
quote:

Never said he should hang it up, but he was frequently compared to Wyatt Langford and as yet Langford is a far better overall player. Players have slumps but Crews couldn't do shite with MLB pitching this season.


Holy shite this is an odd take.

Wyatt Langford has 47 Hits in 207 ABs with 11 HRs and 26 RBIs and 11 Stolen bases. In 55 games.

While Crews has 31 hits in 158 ABs with 7 HRs and 15 RBs and 11 stolen bases in 45 games.

And it is no debate who is better as a defender. Now lets look a little closer.

In the last 25 games Crews was hitting 17/84 over .200 with 4 HRs and 5 stolen bases and 8 walks. He was starting to put it together. Wyatt was in the MLB for the better portion last year so he had a significant head start to get used to the game. But in Wyatt's last 25 games hes 19/97 for below .200 with 5 HRs 12 RBIs and 4 stolen bases with 9 walks.

Wyatt is not the far better player. He is a better power hitter even though Crews is not far behind him in that category but I would take Crews as an overall player even right now. He is better defensively by a mile which is the separator.
Posted by fierysnowman
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2015
2096 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 9:37 am to
It’s absolutely silly to question whether Dylan Crews is a bust at 23 years old. Most prospects don’t reach the big show until age 25. And those prospects usually struggle for a few years while adjusting to the best pitching on Earth. Dylan is already ahead of the curve.

Dylan is a special player and he will be fine

My question is….where do you guys come up with this crap?
Posted by Solo Cam
Member since Sep 2015
34132 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 9:54 am to
In April he hit that, not May.

Here's the stats

He had a higher average and more home runs than Juan Soto in April.

Y'all seem to want to shite on Crews and idgaf. I think the kids going to be a stud, one of us will be right and one of us will be wrong.
Posted by Saunson69
Stephen the Pirate
Member since May 2023
6865 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:11 am to
Well of course this is an ultra biased site. However, if you polled Twitter, any site where it's not mostly LSU fans, the answer would be likely yes so far that he has not performed nearly to expectation. He still has time, but to date, yes he has. Hitters can take a while to get adjusted.
This post was edited on 6/10/25 at 10:13 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram