0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Court date for LSU vs the SEC Nov 18th per WBRZ
Posted on 10/27/26 at 4:34 pm to JudgeHolden
Posted on 10/27/26 at 4:34 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
I think the SEC is really making a lot more out of it than they needed to.
Like I get on one hand that a complaint is going to paint a certain picture, but the SEC's (amended) complaint and their subsequent replies to the Defendants' motion to dismiss make it seem like the fabric of society will be torn to shreds if the court doesn't rule in the SEC's favor.
Which is funny because the court can't even give the SEC the relief it's seeking.
Posted on 10/27/26 at 4:35 pm to mikelsu15
quote:
So what does this most recent development mean?
Hard to say specifically.
If I HAD to guess, I would say the judge wants to call them all in to tell them to behave. That is just my absolute speculation.
Posted on 10/27/26 at 4:50 pm to JudgeHolden
5th circuit addressed ex parte young & found contacts insufficient in Stroman v. wercinski (2008)
“To draw no distinction between officers of a state and the state itself would allow an Oklahoma resident to sue a California state trooper in Texas for civil rights violations occurring in California”
The court goes on to characterize this as an attempt at universal jurisdiction without limiting principles / also separately rejects specific jurisdiction.
I wonder if LSU has not cited this case
“To draw no distinction between officers of a state and the state itself would allow an Oklahoma resident to sue a California state trooper in Texas for civil rights violations occurring in California”
The court goes on to characterize this as an attempt at universal jurisdiction without limiting principles / also separately rejects specific jurisdiction.
I wonder if LSU has not cited this case
Posted on 10/27/26 at 5:06 pm to nicholastiger
SEC head official David Smith Jr will be the judge
Posted on 10/27/26 at 5:07 pm to tzimme4
AG Liz Murrill is going to pants Sankey in court and show everyone his little Jewish dick
Posted on 10/27/26 at 5:19 pm to DrrTiger
quote:
What exactly do these assholes want?
They want LSU to bend the knee, frick'em.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News