- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Coach O Is Crushing It
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:25 pm to earl keese
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:25 pm to earl keese
quote:
I've always believed Mullen was the better coach anyway.
I have as well, but I also thought Coach O was gonna crash and burn. He's obviously proven me wrong there and I hope he continues to prove me wrong and is wildly successful beating Mullen's arse every step of the way.
This post was edited on 2/22/19 at 4:26 pm
1
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:26 pm to RogerTheShrubber
That makes no sense because you’re not stuck with the 11 on the field, their are other options you can use.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:26 pm to OTIS2
140 Idiot s
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:27 pm to ScaryClown
You lost your mind
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:27 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
There are other things besides a single player that could’ve been done to protect Burrow including using another player in the spot that was underperforming.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:28 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
A guy who plays 8 snaps is going to get targeted - whether on D or O. A team's no stronger than its weakest link.
First statement is technically accurate. Second statement is flat wrong.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:29 pm to Madking
quote:
That makes no sense because you’re not stuck with the 11 on the field
Coaches always exploit weaknesses and take advantage of favorable matchups. That's coaching 101.
Something really stupid would be like attacking their strength.
Across the board, teams will find the weakest link on the field and exploit it. Limited to players who see playing time of course.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:32 pm to Philippines4LSU
quote:Fine. A team is weakened by it's weakest link.
First statement is technically accurate. Second statement is flat wrong.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:32 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Sure but you can only exploit a weakness that involved in 1% of snaps so much.
My point t is that Clemson didn’t need to be 44 deep.
They played 35 players most of the time and they were great 35 players
My point t is that Clemson didn’t need to be 44 deep.
They played 35 players most of the time and they were great 35 players
This post was edited on 2/22/19 at 4:38 pm
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:34 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Something really stupid would be like attacking their strength.
I'm still amazed that jackass actually said that on national television.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:35 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Sure but you can only exploit a weakness that involved in 1% of snaps so much.
Theres always a weakness on the field. On offense you try to play around yours, on defense you exploit it.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:35 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
And it’s hard to beat a team that’s barely playing their weakest link.
Not to mention junk time snaps meaning nothing.
Not to mention junk time snaps meaning nothing.
This post was edited on 2/22/19 at 4:36 pm
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:36 pm to RogerTheShrubber
But that’s not the same thing as what we were discussing. We’re talking about adjustments to players underperforming and weakest link on a roster. You’re changing the entire topic not making a point.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:42 pm to Madking
quote:
But that’s not the same thing as what we were discussing. We’re talking about adjustments to players underperforming and weakest link on a roster. You’re changing the entire topic not making a point.
You're late to this particular discussion. We are talking about the relative depth of Bama and Clemson. Clearly, Bama is the deeper team talent-wise. Sammy is trying to spin the laughable yarn that depth doesn't matter much. (Sammy's getting nowhere with it, but it is fun to watch.)
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:42 pm to RogerTheShrubber
I don’t disagree with your statement at all, it’s just not relevant to what I was saying.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:44 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
I’m not arguing that in fact I even said that. What I said was the cliche you used was false and that of the players who actually played and at the most important positions Clemson was better.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:45 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
I said Bama is better depth wise.
But you don’t play 55 players in significant time.
The gap between the people actually playing the game isn’t that great.
But you don’t play 55 players in significant time.
The gap between the people actually playing the game isn’t that great.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:46 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
And it’s hard to beat a team that’s barely playing their weakest link.
I wouldnt call that a weak link if hes not playing. 2 deep should be the limit for any game
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:47 pm to RogerTheShrubber
I agree With you, I thinn We’re having 2 different arguemenrs
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:49 pm to SammyTiger
Maybe. It gets convoluted in here
Page 158 of 166
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News