- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clearing up news that came out about schools being investigated by NCAA
Posted on 6/13/19 at 1:48 pm to ellessuuuu
Posted on 6/13/19 at 1:48 pm to ellessuuuu
quote:
the NCAA admits they cannot use anything not admitted as evidence to prove wrongdoing
This was never a concern for LSU lol.
It was what they find when they sniff around.
1
Posted on 6/13/19 at 1:55 pm to Lester Earl
What is that going to be?
NCAA doesn't have subpoena power, they can't exactly go digging into bank accounts. All the necessary parties surrounding Smart were interviewed in March. Wade was interviewed in April. Where is this magic evidence going to come from?
NCAA doesn't have subpoena power, they can't exactly go digging into bank accounts. All the necessary parties surrounding Smart were interviewed in March. Wade was interviewed in April. Where is this magic evidence going to come from?
Posted on 6/13/19 at 2:03 pm to ForeverLSU5
Do you know how happy I’d be when LSU skates, but if UK or Duke got caught? That would make me so happy
Posted on 6/13/19 at 2:07 pm to ellessuuuu
If you’re going to keep referring to the article, you should notate the part about the ncaa waiting for the trial to end.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 2:12 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Do you know how happy I’d be when LSU skates, but if UK or Duke got caught? That would make me so happy
Posted on 6/13/19 at 2:16 pm to Lester Earl
Okay. The trial ended and Wade's wiretaps were not introduced as evidence and they have already interviewed him and Smart. What's your point?
Posted on 6/13/19 at 2:25 pm to ellessuuuu
My point is that an Interview is not an investigation. Which they clearly state they were waiting to do after the trial
I’m guessing they told LSU to play smart at their own risk
I think they prob told LSU to reinstate Wade at their own risk, hence their the new clause in his contract
That they would revisit when the trial cleared
I’m guessing they told LSU to play smart at their own risk
I think they prob told LSU to reinstate Wade at their own risk, hence their the new clause in his contract
That they would revisit when the trial cleared
Posted on 6/13/19 at 2:42 pm to ForeverLSU5
How many here will help DickieV's twitter to melt down if Duke is on that list and LSU isn't?
-ithad2bme raises hand
-ithad2bme raises hand
Posted on 6/13/19 at 3:13 pm to RB10
quote:
Wade is not on tape.
Not the point. The article indicated a tape was played during the trial implicating Wade. Perhaps that’s only hearsay but who is to say the NCAA won’t use it as a premise for further investigation.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 3:16 pm to JohnnyU
quote:
Not the point. The article indicated a tape was played during the trial implicating Wade. Perhaps that’s only hearsay but who is to say the NCAA won’t use it as a premise for further investigation.
The tape was never played. A transcript of it was read in a pretrial hearing in an attempt to have it entered as evidence. The judge refused.
The NCAA has said they cannot use anything as evidence if they don't have copies of the source material. The tape is the source material and the FBI has made it clear that said tape will not be made public.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 3:23 pm to JohnnyU
T-F’ing Bob!
If I am not mistaken, he is on the humble Jordy Culotta’s Show, while the show-promo plays and Jordy speaks, cocky-entitled T-Bob is making All-Eyes-On-Me-Gestures, essentially disrespecting Culotta!
Think this RUBE is apt to spout off for attention? I guess he will speculate to LSU MBB’s peril, eh??? Don’t lend credence to T-Bob’s irresponsible talk and action, it gives him energy/fuel!!
Bill Arnsparger the Defense Genius would say: « Don’t encourage your opponent, win then point to the scoreboard »
If I am not mistaken, he is on the humble Jordy Culotta’s Show, while the show-promo plays and Jordy speaks, cocky-entitled T-Bob is making All-Eyes-On-Me-Gestures, essentially disrespecting Culotta!
Think this RUBE is apt to spout off for attention? I guess he will speculate to LSU MBB’s peril, eh??? Don’t lend credence to T-Bob’s irresponsible talk and action, it gives him energy/fuel!!
Bill Arnsparger the Defense Genius would say: « Don’t encourage your opponent, win then point to the scoreboard »
Posted on 6/13/19 at 3:30 pm to Lester Earl
Who cares if they are investigating, where is the evidence? What are they going to find? What witness is going to admit to helping pay recruits? What document is going to used to issue sanctions?
The answer is none of this exists.
The contract amendment is window dressing.
The answer is none of this exists.
The contract amendment is window dressing.
This post was edited on 6/13/19 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 6/13/19 at 3:50 pm to ellessuuuu
quote:
where is the evidence? What are they going to find?
Who knows! That’s why they investigate, Jesus. Hopefully nothing, but Will Wade was mentioned 3 different times with 3 different players. You act like this is a witch hunt with no legs.
Do you know if there is no paper trail? Please share if si
Posted on 6/13/19 at 4:05 pm to Lester Earl
And that's my point, what are they investigating? They do not have subpoena power. They cannot compel individuals not associated with NCAA schools to sit for an interview. The NCAA is extremely limited in its ability to investigate these matters. That is why it was so important that the wiretaps not be admitted into evidence.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 4:06 pm to Philippines4LSU
Craig is my spirit animal
Posted on 6/13/19 at 6:12 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
The reply of someone that just realized they were wrong.
No clown...just a nice way pf letting you down (while you were googling what brady material is)
Idiot
Posted on 6/13/19 at 7:27 pm to AlxTgr
quote:just go look at who’s posting negatively I guess we’ll wait. Give you a hint. Lester Earl. Tiger Ray. While they come across as not exactly being negative they never support him. It’s all a bunch of bullshite.
This is not only made up, it's dumb and suggests mental illness or midgetry.
Now let’s discuss the top five head coaches on LSU‘s campus.
1. DD Breaux Jay Clark - WOMENS GYMNASTICS ELITE PROGRAM multiple SEC titles and twice National runner up the last 2 years
2. Will Wade - BASKETBALL Year 2 from garbage to sweet 16
3. Beth Torino - SOFTBALL been to the WCWS 4 times in the last 7 years.
4. CPM - BASEBALL 1 title and 1 runner up which was only two years ago.
5. Dave Winstead - Golf 1 title and many highly competitive teams.
6. Dennis Shaver - TRACK AND FIELD Improving. t2 titles (1 vacated due to Sudafed inadvertently taken) in both men’s and women’s indoor and outdoor he only finished 4 times since 2006 out of the top 10. That’s remarkable consistency.
7. Russell Brock - 3 years and 2 top ten finishes to the final 4. That fast.
Yet Orgeron gets every break possible like Miami dumping ole UGa coach, UF being a shithole and TAMU in 2017, etc most of the SECW tiring coaches of them leaving... brag about records. That’s the joke
This post was edited on 6/13/19 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 6/13/19 at 7:40 pm to ellessuuuu
What’s stopping the NCAA from simply just interviewing Dawkins? He was purportedly the other person on the wiretap?
Now, he may not want to speak while he (a) is appealing his conviction and (b) if he plans to get back into the “business” after he serves his sentence. However, if he has an ax to grind he certainly could speak to investigators. Obviously there would be credibility issues with his testimony. But it could lead to more concrete evidence from other sources.
Now, he may not want to speak while he (a) is appealing his conviction and (b) if he plans to get back into the “business” after he serves his sentence. However, if he has an ax to grind he certainly could speak to investigators. Obviously there would be credibility issues with his testimony. But it could lead to more concrete evidence from other sources.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 8:32 pm to ellessuuuu
quote:
NCAA has to have some proof to issue the notice of allegation, and right now, it has none.
Wrong. The NCAA decides for itself the definition of "proof." BTW...how do you know the NCAA does "not have proof?"
quote:
Without those wiretaps, the NCAA has no evidence upon which it could base a notice of allegation against LSU or Wade.
Again, how do you know what evidence the NCAA has?
quote:
The NCAA rules do not allow them to use anonymous source information to hit a school with sanctions.
You are skipping steps with this statement. The NCAA CAN use anonymous information as "evidence." The NCAA has an anonymous tip line (just as most universities have). The NCAA can also interview someone who has direct knowledge of the WW wiretaps and THAT would be evidence. Remember, the NCAA decides what the definition of evidence is.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 8:36 pm to Lester Earl
You are so wrong on this one!
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News