Started By
Message

re: BUNTING basics for Lester

Posted on 2/21/25 at 8:03 pm to
Posted by Solo Cam
Member since Sep 2015
33901 posts
Posted on 2/21/25 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

Mascona is going to hate it.
All but guarantees it's a good decision. Is this fig still selling game coin?
This post was edited on 2/21/25 at 8:04 pm
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
171639 posts
Posted on 2/21/25 at 8:13 pm to
Bunting after back to back walks to open the inning is the stupid. Make the pitcher throw strikes. Don’t give him an out when he can’t find the plate.
Posted by Howyouluhdat
On Fleek St
Member since Jan 2015
8264 posts
Posted on 2/21/25 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

not a time to be situational in the 5th inning regardless. Dickinson is slugging like 1.132 through 4 games. Let him hit the ball out the infield somewhere



Nobody was really hitting the ball. It was a cold uncomfortable night and that’s why Jay did it. Why is this so hard to understand?
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
34656 posts
Posted on 2/21/25 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

It was a cold uncomfortable night and that’s why Jay did it. Why is this so hard to understand?



Just because you know what the reasoning was doesn’t make it not dumb.
This post was edited on 2/21/25 at 8:55 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
284884 posts
Posted on 2/21/25 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

Nobody was really hitting the ball. It was a cold uncomfortable night and that’s why Jay did it.


There are multiple ways a runner gets to 3rd without bunting

quote:

Why is this so hard to understand?


You think I don’t know why he bunted? lol ok. Doesn’t mean it wasn’t stupid
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
28065 posts
Posted on 2/21/25 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

You think I don’t know why he bunted?
how much have you made playing, umpiring or coaching any level of baseball?
This post was edited on 2/21/25 at 8:48 pm
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
28065 posts
Posted on 2/21/25 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

Just never know what the reasoning was doesn’t make it not dumb.

So are double negatives in a sentence. He had statistical reasons on his side.he knows his team. He knows his players. He has played out that scenario for the player versus the pitcher.
It is like that dumbass chick that used to be the Advocate beat writer and her asking the same dumbass question on leaving g RISP. DO THE MATH.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
34656 posts
Posted on 2/21/25 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

He had statistical reasons on his side



No he doesn’t
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
84213 posts
Posted on 2/21/25 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

Just because you know what the reasoning was doesn’t make it not dumb.
Wow
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
34656 posts
Posted on 2/21/25 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

Wow




An idiotic hunch that a good hitter will suck so bad because muh cold weather that you will intentionally give up an out and lower your expected runs is a dumb decision.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
84213 posts
Posted on 2/21/25 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

An idiotic hunch that a good hitter will suck so bad because muh cold weather that you will intentionally give up an out and lower your expected runs is a dumb decision
Wow
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Midwest, USA
Member since Dec 2019
61086 posts
Posted on 2/21/25 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

An idiotic hunch that a good hitter will suck so bad because muh cold weather that you will intentionally give up an out and lower your expected runs is a dumb decision.

It's always funny to me when message board posters believe they're smarter than coaches who are literally paid millions of dollars to do what they do.

I understand you get someone like Les Miles sometimes who is so stubborn that literally everyone can see what the problem is, except him. That's really the exception to the rule though.

Never change, Rantards.

Posted by LSU82BILL
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Member since Sep 2006
10603 posts
Posted on 2/21/25 at 9:19 pm to
quote:

There are multiple ways a runner gets to 3rd without bunting


Which ways have a higher probability of succeeding and which the hitting team also has control of the situation? Statistically, you have a better chance of scoring a run with 1 out and a runner on 3rd than you do with a runner on 2nd with nobody out. And there are many more ways to score from 3rd base and 1 out than there are from 2nd base and no outs.
Posted by Kim Jong Ir
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2008
54057 posts
Posted on 2/21/25 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

It's always funny to me when message board posters believe they're smarter than coaches who are literally paid millions of dollars to do what they do.



Hey Coach O
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
12720 posts
Posted on 2/22/25 at 12:08 am to
quote:

Meh, it’s situational for sure, but as a coach I firmly believe in using early season to run scenarios that may not make sense otherwise.

Exactly what I was thinking. This is practicing situational baseball to see how kids react.
Posted by Solo Cam
Member since Sep 2015
33901 posts
Posted on 2/22/25 at 12:51 am to
quote:

When you have a guy that can run, and also slugged .592 & .661 the last two years is just an all time moronic decision.


LSU coach manufactures a run

Lester Earl "yeah but it's retarded because it totally hurt my feelings how they scored"

fricking idiot compared Garrett Nussmeier to Andrew Hatch like 2 weeks ago

Stop paying attention to this clown.

Hey Lester you should make more recruiting rankings that no one gives a frick about
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
61210 posts
Posted on 2/22/25 at 2:26 am to
quote:

Statistically, you have a better chance of scoring a run with 1 out and a runner on 3rd than you do with a runner on 2nd with nobody out.


This is the issue. You guys are in here just trying to score A run. ONE run. Les and the rest of us are trying to score runS, plural.

Outs are precious. You don’t give the other team any free ones when you don’t have to. And if the other team is willing to give you one, you take it. You think Omaha was pissed we were bunting there or thrilled to fricking death? Did their pitcher throw some wicked off speed pitch on the black or a fastball down the dick?
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Midwest, USA
Member since Dec 2019
61086 posts
Posted on 2/22/25 at 2:43 am to
quote:

This is the issue. You guys are in here just trying to score A run. ONE run. Les and the rest of us are trying to score runS, plural.



Runs were at a premium in that game, better to score one than none at all.
Posted by Pankins
Flahrida
Member since Oct 2010
1273 posts
Posted on 2/22/25 at 6:20 am to
quote:

So are double negatives in a sentence

Fun fact - double negatives are grammatically incorrect only when used unintentionally. In this case, he used it correctly.
>themoreyouknow.gif
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
284884 posts
Posted on 2/22/25 at 6:50 am to
quote:

Which ways have a higher probability of succeeding and which the hitting team also has control of the situation?


Controling the probability does not override the potential results of swinging away in that situation. Even with that said, 15% of sac bunts last year in the MLB resulted in a popup/SO/FC.

Swinging away is probably slightly more risky but the reward is much greater than giving up an out in that situation.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram