- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Beating a Dead Horse: Question on PP Int in 09
Posted on 11/1/11 at 1:52 pm to Ghostfacedistiller
Posted on 11/1/11 at 1:52 pm to Ghostfacedistiller
They got the call wrong. May not have mattered in the end, but they got it wrong.
0
Posted on 11/1/11 at 2:05 pm to Ghostfacedistiller
quote:
Beating a Dead Horse
Should have stopped right there.
Posted on 11/1/11 at 2:06 pm to Ghostfacedistiller
Posted on 11/1/11 at 2:08 pm to Ghostfacedistiller
ive heard that before on the secrant.
Posted on 11/1/11 at 2:24 pm to Ghostfacedistiller
that's not a rule.
the play was called an int on the feild and they claimed there was not a good enough angle to see and overturn it. just like the CJs play from 08 where he slapped the ball out of the wrs hands out the endzone.
that said, i think everyone would agree it was obviously an int.
the play was called an int on the feild and they claimed there was not a good enough angle to see and overturn it. just like the CJs play from 08 where he slapped the ball out of the wrs hands out the endzone.
that said, i think everyone would agree it was obviously an int.
Posted on 11/1/11 at 3:40 pm to Ghostfacedistiller
I love how he is so sure that Jones was touching the ball when there isn't a single replay out there to verify this, but those two big divots in the green from PP's feet, those mean absolutely nothing. 
This post was edited on 11/1/11 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 11/1/11 at 3:46 pm to Ghostfacedistiller
The ONLY thing to remember about that play and that game, and the only thing that matters........is that the REPLAY OFFICIAL IN THE BOOTH THAT RELAYED THE DECISION DOWN TO THE REFEREE ON THE FIELD....... WAS AN ALABAMA ALUMNUS. PERIOD.
Notice there was NOOOOOOO explanation, just 'THE RULING ON THE FIELD STANDS.' WTF ?????????????????????????????????????????
The man had not one, but BOTH feet in bounds, and had clearly caught the ball without it moving simultaneously........
But it was ruled out of bounds.
K. Nothing fishy there boy...
Notice there was NOOOOOOO explanation, just 'THE RULING ON THE FIELD STANDS.' WTF ?????????????????????????????????????????
The man had not one, but BOTH feet in bounds, and had clearly caught the ball without it moving simultaneously........
But it was ruled out of bounds.
K. Nothing fishy there boy...
Posted on 11/1/11 at 3:50 pm to jrich11
quote:
that's not a rule.
yes it is, but it doesn't matter on this specific play.
quote:
the play was called an int on the feild and they claimed there was not a good enough angle to see and overturn it. just like the CJs play from 08 where he slapped the ball out of the wrs hands out the endzone.
it was ruled incomplete on the field.
quote:
that said, i think everyone would agree it was obviously an int.
it was definitely an INT.
Posted on 11/1/11 at 3:50 pm to The Boat
Everyone is missing the real point. Julio's TD should have been flagged for block in back. Ref looking right at the block not 2 ft away. The gumps had the lead at that point (PP Play) that they should not have had. 7 no calls in gumps favor decided game much more than the terrible ruling by the replay official and SEC not responding in any manner to the complaint logded by LSU with video evidence. They didn't even acknowledge the receipt of the complain. Basically did the same thing the ref crew did.... said screw you LSU and both did. Another note of interest, same ref for this game. Does that tell you what the SEC wants to happen? 
Posted on 11/1/11 at 3:53 pm to MetryTyger
quote:
REPLAY OFFICIAL IN THE BOOTH THAT RELAYED THE DECISION DOWN TO THE REFEREE ON THE FIELD....... WAS AN ALABAMA ALUMNUS.
I've heard this before. Is there a link?
Its just so hard to believe that a Bama Alum could be in the replay booth.
Posted on 11/1/11 at 5:21 pm to jrodLSUke
Posted on 11/1/11 at 5:49 pm to CottonWasKing
wow, advertisers like guys like you.
they might hire you to design their ads.
bye, bye
they might hire you to design their ads.
bye, bye
Posted on 11/1/11 at 5:55 pm to OldSarge38
you know it,
i know it,
miles knows it,
lsu players know it....
if we don't win by 42 the refs will decide the game. to win in bds, lsu has to CRUSH alabama.
lsu will crush alabama.
les is smart, he doesn't complain, he gets even.
i know it,
miles knows it,
lsu players know it....
if we don't win by 42 the refs will decide the game. to win in bds, lsu has to CRUSH alabama.
lsu will crush alabama.
les is smart, he doesn't complain, he gets even.
Posted on 11/1/11 at 5:55 pm to OldSarge38
you know it,
i know it,
miles knows it,
lsu players know it....
if we don't win by 42 the refs will decide the game. to win in bds, lsu has to CRUSH alabama.
lsu will crush alabama.
les is smart, he doesn't complain, he gets even.
i know it,
miles knows it,
lsu players know it....
if we don't win by 42 the refs will decide the game. to win in bds, lsu has to CRUSH alabama.
lsu will crush alabama.
les is smart, he doesn't complain, he gets even.
Posted on 11/1/11 at 6:03 pm to The Boat
This image is the only explanation you need to tell the guy he is a dumbass.
Posted on 11/1/11 at 6:13 pm to Ghostfacedistiller
...and Benjy Thibodeaux DID NOT grab Paul McDonald's face mask against USC in 1979.
But guess what? The freaking game is over. Let it go.
But guess what? The freaking game is over. Let it go.
Posted on 11/1/11 at 6:17 pm to Ghostfacedistiller
WOW! I had someone tell me the same thing. He was a HS referee and HATES LSU eventhough he grew up in the BR area. He was talking about how dumb casual fans were and even cited some frickin rule from the rulebook. There was no sense in arguing with him. This guy ran track and was a coach (track). Is this possibly the same person? Ticked me off when he made that argument cause a cyclops with a cataract coulda saw that it was an INT!
Posted on 11/1/11 at 6:19 pm to Ghostfacedistiller
Bama sidelines were drawn up by drunks.
Posted on 11/1/11 at 7:03 pm to sheek
face it. we have to play 11 vs 18 (19 if you add the booth). that's what we have to overcome.
Posted on 11/1/11 at 7:09 pm to Ghostfacedistiller
Here, this is what you are looking for. Show the fricktard this as it addresses all points:
PP robbed interception
PP robbed interception
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News