- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: bama got there bag man to the sec office
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:33 am to Fight4LSU
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:33 am to Fight4LSU
quote:It was his side judge and then the replay official. Ritter himself didn't make the call iirc.
Was it Ritter that called the Patrick Peterson interception incomplete?
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:33 am to AlxTgr
quote:
Nothing shows he touched it. If he did, his feet were still in bounds. You're either blind or just can't admit when you're wrong.
Scroll up and watch the video in this thread Axl.
Can you not see #8's right arm extended in front of PP as the ball arrives ?
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:35 am to TangipahoaTiger
quote:This interception would have scored 10 points for LSU. This call cost LSU the game.
![]()
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:36 am to SweetTeaOnionRings
Tough to beat Bama and Ritter combo.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:37 am to SweetTeaOnionRings
Bama loses more often Ritter on the field than any other ref. But hey, don't let facts get in the way of a good story.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:38 am to BRgetthenet
I have a friend who is an Sec ref and he graduated from LSU. He is not allowed to call LSU games. I'm not going to give his name and I don't care if any of you don't believe me
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:39 am to samson73103
quote:
Bama loses more often Ritter on the field than any other ref. But hey, don't let facts get in the way of a good story.
Because he always refs games against Bama's best opponents.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:39 am to ballscaster
Well ur still from neast so that officially makes u a btch
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:40 am to samson73103
quote:
Bama loses more often Ritter on the field than any other ref. But hey, don't let facts get in the way of a good story
Thanks for your interest in the TIGERrant. Now kindly GTFO.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:43 am to ballscaster
quote:
quote: Was it Ritter that called the Patrick Peterson interception incomplete?
It was his side judge and then the replay official. Ritter himself didn't make the call iirc.
IIRC, word at the time was the replay official in the booth was a Bama grad (dont recall name but not Ritter) who ruled it incomplete.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:43 am to TheHat7
quote:Shut up, stupid. Northeast Louisiana, actually, is where I'm from. Get back to ironing your tshirts. Gotta starch 'em up real good.
Well ur still from neast so that officially makes u a btch
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:43 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
In 2014 the penalty breakdown was 3-2 in FAVOR of LSU.
It has nothing to do with the total amount of penalties. It is the timeliness of them. Last year is a perfect example.
Yup. Without that 15 yard PF penalty on Bama's 4 yard line, LSU goes in for 7. Game is likely over.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:45 am to jlc05
quote:At any rate, the call appears to be correct. Jones touched the ball while out of bounds. The ball is dead. Not that it mattered in the end. LSU lost by 9, and that wasn't a 9-point play.
IIRC, word at the time was the replay official in the booth was a Bama grad (dont recall name but not Ritter) who ruled it incomplete.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:45 am to samson73103
quote:
Bama loses more often Ritter on the field than any other ref. But hey, don't let facts get in the
Bammer isnt too good with facts....or more accurately, we quickly see thru your spin.
Timeliness of calls is the key point with Ritter.
This post was edited on 10/27/15 at 11:46 am
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:46 am to samson73103
Bama cheats and there is nothing you can say to hide that fact. Go F yourself
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:51 am to TangipahoaTiger
quote:
Jones touches the ball first.
So Jones touches the ball first, even though both of Peterson's hands are in front of Jones'? You realize that is physically impossible, right?
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:53 am to TangipahoaTiger
Look guys. Any bias is really, but it doesn't happen on every play or replay. What they do is make calls which stall drives, keep drives alive, etc. This gives Bama more possessions and maybe changes the field position game which helps any team getting those calls.
It's the subtle but effective stuff that add up and sway advantage.
I don't think Ritter would just see a blatantly obvious replay and rule against it. That would jeopardize the whole scheme
It's the subtle but effective stuff that add up and sway advantage.
I don't think Ritter would just see a blatantly obvious replay and rule against it. That would jeopardize the whole scheme
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:57 am to GeeOH
quote:Nah.
What they do is make calls which stall drives, keep drives alive, etc. This gives Bama more possessions and maybe changes the field position game which helps any team getting those calls.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 12:00 pm to ballscaster
quote:
the call appears to be correct. Jones touched the ball while out of bounds. The ball is dead.
I haven't followed this whole conversation, but why would Jones touching the ball while in bounds make the play dead?
Posted on 10/27/15 at 12:03 pm to SweetTeaOnionRings
You are superrantarded.
Popular
Back to top


1





