re: As the season draws closer and closer, Oregon fans get crazier and crazier

quote:

---

Yes there is a chance one might see a USC transfer Senior play against LSU for UO.

---

No there's not. NCAA ok'd it. 12-pac said no. Same rules as last season

quote:

---

if our little brother could almost win at LSU why is it some LSU fans are saying there is no way UO can't even hang with your team then?

---

Playing Devils Advocate here... maybe they feel this way cause the OSU game was 7 years ago. We are a different and much better team now then we were that season. Also they were playing in horrible conditions. The field was a mess. Those conditions were a great equalizer. Pac1 fans might just say they are excuses... but the funny thing about excuses... usually they are true. I don't think the weather will be a factor at Jerrys World.

No on another note... anyone (not just you) who has a problem with the biases here really doesn't have to be here in the first place. Anyone who has a problem with LSU fans not giving a PAC1 team enough respect can always leave. We are on a Tiger forum. Don't like whats said, leave.

quote:

---

I don't care. It's a retort to all the SEC rulz bullshite.

---

Don't like "SEC rulz"? go back to a lame arse PAC1 forum. You all butthurt cause fans on a SEC teams forum say what EVERYONE in the country (except PAC1 fans) already know. It's like you have a problem with someone saying water is wet. Got a problem with the obvious? Go back to a lame PAC1 forum where you can all agree with falsifications... like "pac1 is better than SEC"

As to the SEC thing, I can explain that. We pride ourselves on being the toughest conference in college football (as you are no doubt tired of hearing). We are a little annoying about this, because most of the polls get voted on based on W-L record, and we feel this undervalues our teams (which run a gauntlet). Fans of teams outside the SEC generally don't appreciate this. For example, in this thread someone brought up Ole Miss being 4-8 and implied they were no tougher than any other conferences 4-8 teams. Well, they are in a conference with Alabama, Arkansas, Auburn, and LSU (giving them 4 losses right off the top), which means a 4-8 Ole Miss is much closer to a 0.500 team in another conference. When you look at the top 5 teams of the SEC west, they were 43-2 against teams outside that group last year.

In order to be the toughest conference, our teams need to win OOC and our bowl games. So we root for each other, and we dominate, and that's how we like it.

I live in Texas, and there are a bunch of Texas natives that are now SEC fans. They had friends that were fans of one of the SEC teams, and they got pulled in. AFter watching a season of SEC football, they were hooked. No other conference can compare. None of them come close.

quote:

---

Watch it... you'll make someone all butthurt and cry. All because they are not smart enough to go back to their little piss ant forums where they all agree their shitty conference is better than it really is.

---

I have yet to find another forum where the posts aren't at least 12 hours in between each other. Its hard to bitch when no one is listening.

quote:

---

you freaking tool.

---

I'm going back to my PAC1 forum and cry. Oh wait... I just remembered I'm an LSU and SEC fan... which means I have a spine.

The rant is the best forum out there. People from other schools come here and get hooked. Some stay. I expect them to defend their schools and conferences. I don't expect them to come close to winning those arguments. Oregon has a few forums, but they aren't that good.

quote:

---

"their defense is slower than BSU"

---

I 'd

LSU may lose... but it sure as hell won't be because of speed on defense.

quote:

---

I think there is a big difference between the BSU game, and the upcoming LSU game for a couple of reasons.

First, The team that went to BSU went in very cocky, over confident and in my eyes, had a bad game plan. Running Blunt sideline to sideline instead of North and South was a bad idea. BSU had a smaller, very fast defense that negated that plan. BSU didn't have to stack the box to stop that plan. Because of that, the short passing game with Masoli wasn't effective at all.

Second, LSU's defense is big, but much slower than BSU's. Their D line won't last very long having to chase Oregon's RB's sideline to sideline all day. From what I've seen from LSU, they're not super deep on the D-Line, so putting in a quality player to give the starters a breather will be tough for them. When LSU has to dedicate more players to stop the run game, the passing game will open up with a much better QB than Masoli ever was, who can stretch the field (Albeit with unproven receivers).

I think Oregon's speed (both the team's speed, and the speed of the game) will hit LSU hard in the late 3rd quarter. The roof will most likely be open at Cowboys stadium, so the heat and humidity will be a factor. I don't see it bothering Oregon as much as some people may think. Oregon handled it just fine when they went to Tennessee last year.

Don't get me wrong, I think it will be a close game. I'd be surprised if Oregon scores more than 30. I just don't see the LSU defense being as effective as the Auburn defense.

---

So we have no depth on the D line, and our D is slow, and Tennessee is hotter and more humid than Louisiana? And UOs D will be more effective than LSUs. Didn't they lose a ton on D?

Northeast hippies do smoke a lot of dope don't they?