10
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Alabama started 18 of 22 players that were in the program for more than one year
Posted on 11/9/26 at 8:17 am
Posted on 11/9/26 at 8:17 am
LSU started 8.
For all of the teenage girls talking about how every roster is year to year in NIL.
It seems absurd to have to make these points but this is clearly going to be the least depth and continuity that we will ever have under Kiffin.
Go through the rankings and I would venture a guess that we are one of the teams with the lowest retention rate among ranked teams.
For all of the teenage girls talking about how every roster is year to year in NIL.
It seems absurd to have to make these points but this is clearly going to be the least depth and continuity that we will ever have under Kiffin.
Go through the rankings and I would venture a guess that we are one of the teams with the lowest retention rate among ranked teams.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 8:21 am to Tiger Voodoo
I didn't want Kiffin keeping anything from that abomination of a roster that was last year. He obviously went for guys in the portal with multiple years of eligibility so hopefully he cant start building more continuity.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 8:24 am to SouthOfSouth
Yea we had a lot of bad apples that had to be sent packing and as you pointed out Lane went and got alot of multi year guys.
We just have a subsection of retards that think everything happens instantly because of the portal and what a big 10 team did.
Oh and their darling Kentucky which has two losses by over 20 and happen to beat us on the back of some questionable calls.
Year 1 wasn’t going to be it, we had to overhaul the entire program, a massive roster overhaul. It sucks we didn’t beat ole Miss or Kentucky because they were winnable
We just have a subsection of retards that think everything happens instantly because of the portal and what a big 10 team did.
Oh and their darling Kentucky which has two losses by over 20 and happen to beat us on the back of some questionable calls.
Year 1 wasn’t going to be it, we had to overhaul the entire program, a massive roster overhaul. It sucks we didn’t beat ole Miss or Kentucky because they were winnable
Posted on 11/9/26 at 8:39 am to Big4SALTbro
F BAMA.................glad we dont play them for a while.
They have scewed up too many seasons for us.
They have scewed up too many seasons for us.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 8:41 am to lsudirtbag
Continuity!!
Posted on 11/9/26 at 8:42 am to Tiger Voodoo
For those saying a year is enough time and it doesn’t matter, not really.
Just because Cignetti hit lightening in a bottle doesn’t mean it’s the norm.
Just because Cignetti hit lightening in a bottle doesn’t mean it’s the norm.
This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 8:43 am
Posted on 11/9/26 at 8:56 am to Deuces
Cignetti didn’t even hit lightning in a bottle.
Cignetti brought almost half of his starters with him from JMU and literally did not play a single ranked team until November 23rd when they lost by 23 to Ohio State.
They then lost their playoff game which was aganist the second ranked team they played the whole season.
That was Cignetti’s “lightning in a bottle” first season at Indiana. 0-2 against ranked teams. Kiffin is 2-3.
Yes year 2 was very impressive and this is not a knock against the dude that looks like a top 2 or 3 coach in the country, but judging this LSU team against 24 Indiana is ridiculous.
Cignetti brought almost half of his starters with him from JMU and literally did not play a single ranked team until November 23rd when they lost by 23 to Ohio State.
They then lost their playoff game which was aganist the second ranked team they played the whole season.
That was Cignetti’s “lightning in a bottle” first season at Indiana. 0-2 against ranked teams. Kiffin is 2-3.
Yes year 2 was very impressive and this is not a knock against the dude that looks like a top 2 or 3 coach in the country, but judging this LSU team against 24 Indiana is ridiculous.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 8:58 am to Tiger Voodoo
I can’t believe how many people don’t realize that we will be better without having to replace 50 players. Sure there is more turnover with NIL but having SOME continuity would likely be the difference in several of our games.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 9:02 am to Tiger Voodoo
The rantards don’t want to read anything like this. Indiana had a quick turnaround, so everyone should.
What the rantards fail to understand is cignetti had a bunch of transfers into Indiana from JMU, so he was able to bring his established team, identity, and culture. Ole Miss paid out the arse to make sure Lane was unable to do the same.
You have to have some level of patience, something nonexistent on this board.
What the rantards fail to understand is cignetti had a bunch of transfers into Indiana from JMU, so he was able to bring his established team, identity, and culture. Ole Miss paid out the arse to make sure Lane was unable to do the same.
You have to have some level of patience, something nonexistent on this board.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 9:04 am to SouthOfSouth
Yeah go take a look at how many players who transferred out from LSU have done anything this year. Almost none have.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 9:14 am to Tiger Voodoo
They didn’t lose 3 games this year because we didn’t have multiple players in the program last year 
Bama had 7 returning starters. Utah had 5, UCLA had 6. Texas had 11 and they are garbage as well. That’s doesn’t correlate to wins if you never played a snap of football regardless. Is it better to have a 2nd or 3rd year guy who has been in the program but never played or an all American in his first year with the program from the portal??
Bama had 7 returning starters. Utah had 5, UCLA had 6. Texas had 11 and they are garbage as well. That’s doesn’t correlate to wins if you never played a snap of football regardless. Is it better to have a 2nd or 3rd year guy who has been in the program but never played or an all American in his first year with the program from the portal??
This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 9:16 am
Posted on 11/9/26 at 9:23 am to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
It seems absurd to have to make these points but this is clearly going to be the least depth and continuity that we will ever have under Kiffin.
I'm still onboard. We knew we'd have to break a few eggs. Remember Saban's pitch to Lane: retain Louisiana talent. The dude just fricking got here. Ima let him cook awhile.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 9:25 am to Tiger Voodoo
Future is bright. Its only year 1. Give it time.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 9:31 am to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
It seems absurd to have to make these points but this is clearly going to be the least depth and continuity that we will ever have under Kiffin.
You’re assuming all or most of the guys on this team will return to LSU and not hit the portal.
I can almost guarantee Harlem Berry is gone. I’ve had enough of the leavitt project too
Posted on 11/9/26 at 9:47 am to turnpiketiger
Does anyone care if Berry or Durham hit the portal? They aren’t that good.
Lane has a pretty good track record of keeping the guys he is focused on.
Lane has a pretty good track record of keeping the guys he is focused on.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 9:47 am to WigSplitta22
quote:
They didn’t lose 3 games this year because we didn’t have multiple players in the program last year
If you don’t think that had an impact in week 3 against Ole Miss, we’ll just agree to disagree there.
And yes, Alabama’s roster was much better constructed for that game. Was it the only reason we lost, of course not. But pretending depth and continuity isn’t a factor in matchups with a team like Alabama again, we just won’t agree on that.
quote:
Is it better to have a 2nd or 3rd year guy who has been in the program but never played or an all American in his first year with the program from the portal??
How many All Americans did we bring in from the portal? You make it sound like our portal class was filled with them and it just wasn’t. No one’s is, btw.
Give me the 5 star HS guys that have been in a program for 2-3 years over guys that transferred out of other program because they didn’t like their playing time there either
This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 9:50 am
Posted on 11/9/26 at 9:54 am to turnpiketiger
Sure. Some will leave. But the point is, we will lose fewer players than last year to the portal and bring in fewer from the portal. My guess at this point is that use of the portal is half or less than this past year.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 10:29 am to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
Give me the 5 star HS guys that have been in a program for 2-3 years
Where do you find these unicorns at?
Posted on 11/9/26 at 10:30 am to Tiger Voodoo
And most return next year.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 10:32 am to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
How many All Americans did we bring in from the portal? You make it sound like our portal class was filled with them and it just wasn’t. No one’s is, btw.
It’s a hypothetical question
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News