Started By
Message
locked post

After reading of Arkys defensive scheme, Pelini lost to MSU

Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:03 am
Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
32714 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:03 am
All he had to do was make a half time adjustment to zone heavy. That’s it. More guys in the backfield and Costellos options go away.

I know it’s a dead horse, but I’m concerned about his hardheadedness and adapting with what you have.
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143616 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:05 am to
Our corners couldn’t handle man assignments. You think they would have been more successful not fricking up a zone?
Posted by RummelTiger
Texas
Member since Aug 2004
92001 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:05 am to
I'm not going to pretend to know all about defensive schemes, but could he have not done that due to the lack of knowledge and depth in backfield at that time?

Honestly wondering...
Posted by OKtiger
Tulsa, OK
Member since Nov 2014
8639 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:06 am to
quote:

You think they would have been more successful not fricking up a zone?


The point is what did they have to lose???

You're really trying to argue that they shouldn't have tried Zone. That's fricking asinine
Posted by BayouCowboy
Member since Dec 2012
15716 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:08 am to
Costello completed 72% vs Arky, but they played a zone and kept everything in front and were able to break on throws and picked him 3 times. The RAC against us is what killed us. They had more RAC yards vs LSU than total passing yards vs Arkansas
Posted by Bonjourno
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2010
2744 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:09 am to
quote:

Our corners couldn’t handle man assignments. You think they would have been more successful not fricking up a zone?


The were just overmatched. A transfer from Nicholls and a hobbled Ward should not have been asked to chase guys around for 60 min.
Posted by Teufelhunden
Galvez, LA
Member since Feb 2005
5886 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:09 am to
Herbstreit made a comment in the Georgia game about arky's approach to MSU as a lot of zone after last week. That one was on O and Pelini for not adjusting
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
39811 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:13 am to
quote:

All he had to do was make a half time adjustment to zone heavy.


Half time adjustment? How do you not start in that? You had over 1 month to prepare for it
Posted by misey94
Hernando, MS
Member since Jan 2007
27870 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:14 am to
quote:

Our corners couldn’t handle man assignments. You think they would have been more successful not fricking up a zone?


Zone would have been a lot to ask from a bunch of young guys who all had to shift positions the morning of game day. However, was it too much to ask to start backing off, dropping deeper and not playing up on the WRs the whole game? An adjustment like that still playing man could have at least limited the big plays. I think this is a more valid complaint.

That said, Pelini did adjust how we were playing up front last night and it worked. We shut down their run game in the second half, started getting pressure with just 4 and 5 and made their QB look like a true freshman.
This post was edited on 10/4/20 at 10:16 am
Posted by Good Times
Hill top in Tn
Member since Nov 2007
24093 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:21 am to
quote:

That one was on O and Pelini for not adjusting


As previously stated, sometimes you don’t have enough to work with. Stingley would have made a difference. Not just in his coverage, but tallowing different players on the field. We WILL improve.
Posted by bstew3006
318
Member since Dec 2007
12760 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Our corners couldn’t handle man assignments. You think they would have been more successful not fricking up a zone?




Jesus

Some of you think “zone” is as complex as the Saints/chiefs offense. It’s not surprising, most of you think you need a “running” QB to run the RPO.
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:23 am to
quote:


Our corners couldn’t handle man assignments. You think they would have been more successful not fricking up a zone?



Well they couldn’t have done worse so Why not at least try to adjust?
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
68699 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:24 am to
He said that was his concern.
Posted by Tiger_Style
The N.O.
Member since Apr 2019
808 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:27 am to
Zone requires communication and trust. Add in a bunch of young guys who have no experience playing with each other. It would have been worse.
This post was edited on 10/4/20 at 10:30 am
Posted by Ignignot
Member since Mar 2009
18823 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:28 am to
I agree somewhat. If you listened to Os segment on SECn b4 vandy game he said blatantly that coaches needed to make better halftime adjustments.

O WILL hold his assistants accountable, that is why we got 2019 bc he does so.

Also that first game after covid offseason was weird as frick.

Ull beating ISU, arky state beating KSU.

MSU beating us, im starting to think teams had a shite ton of cobwebs to work out.
Posted by BayouBlitz
Member since Aug 2007
18126 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:30 am to
quote:


Our corners couldn’t handle man assignments. You think they would have been more successful not fricking up a zone?


What's the worst that could have happened? Giving up 625 yards passing...oh wait.

Of course our secondary was depleted. But he had 6 weeks to prepare. And infinite video to look at.

Pelini shite the bed. Period.

And through two games, this is one of the worst tackling defenses I've seen at LSU in decades.

Time for Pelini to man up.

Posted by Tigerstark
Parts unknown
Member since Aug 2011
6537 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:30 am to
The real question is why we didn't have it prepared ahead of time. There was plenty of time to install enough zone principals.

In the broadcast last night, they said the LSU coaches claimed there wasn't film on MSU. BS, its the same offense for twenty something years. With lots of film of teams having success against it.

Pelini has always struggled with it. Every single time. He either doesn't know how or isn't capable of setting up the defense in the way that lots of others have.

Posted by KC Tiger
Member since Sep 2006
4669 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Some of you think “zone” is as complex as the Saints/chiefs offense. It’s not surprising, most of you think you need a “running” QB to run the RPO.


Zone is extraordinarily complex for young players who have not practiced much and have never run it. And for those that claimed "it couldn't have gotten worse"....yes it could. At least we forced them to make a few tight passes into good coverage. Credit their QB, he made them. Yes there were many times their receivers were running open, but against an ill-prepared zone they would have been wide open every play.
Posted by phi1514
Hoover, Alabama
Member since Jan 2008
1330 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:33 am to
Better question is why they spent the offseason developing a defensive strategy that revolved around man coverage, when Chris Peterson/Washington had shown the blueprint for how to beat Leach’s offense....which was playing two deep zone. Why?!?!
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
11857 posts
Posted on 10/4/20 at 10:40 am to
Unless you practice zone a lot, it usually fails. Especially when most of the LSU corners are man corners.

It’s not as simple as some make it out to be.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram