Started By
Message

re: Advocate ref expert says all calls were fine except pass int on Greedy!

Posted on 11/25/18 at 3:51 pm to
Posted by tigersruledude
Member since Oct 2005
1484 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 3:51 pm to
Rogers Redding video

Rogers Redding explains it pretty well at 6:50 of this video.

The play on the video is LESS obvious than last nights...and the NCAA head of officiating calls it a catch
Posted by wil
Member since Nov 2006
654 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 4:51 pm to
It’s a live ball so on fumble recoveries why can’t you just kneel with the ball?


This times 1000. If this call is correct then any time there is a fumble all a player who is on the ground has to do is put a finger on the ball and he possesses the ball and is down. A finger now equals possession in college football on a fumble. So if you have 1 finger on a fumble with your arm extended and are on the ground the play is now over. No one can jump on the ball and hold it in both hands to get possession. BUT we all know that is not how it really works. The call was incorrect.
Posted by MightyYat
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2009
24520 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

In that situation the ball only has to be touched.

Embarrassing how low football IQ the rant is.



So on a fumbled ball rolling around all a player has to do is kneel and touch it? Players are on the ground all the time fighting for possession on fumbles. There’s about a billion fumbles in football history that need to be reviewed then. It doesn’t make any sense. It’s a live ball and all he did was touch it with his knee down. The knee came up as he picked up the ball.
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 7:41 pm to
Rant "ref" and "defensive" experts disagree
Posted by Eden Isle Tiger
Eden Isles
Member since Mar 2007
329 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 7:44 pm to
He's a goon will be working for SECN next!Bias comments!
Posted by catnip
Member since Sep 2003
16344 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 7:48 pm to
What about the formation to spike the ball to stop the clock. Is it ok to not have 4 in the back of the line or have 9 on the line? Refs just let them have it because they felt sorry for them? I think that penalty would have had a 10 sec count down added to it, right?
Posted by 31TIGERS
Mike’s habitat
Member since Dec 2004
7219 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

Advocate


Suitable only for the bottom of a birdcage, a litter box, or used as a fish wrap. Their bias and propaganda has no bounds since they’ve obviously taken refereeing classes. Lord knows they’re about as bad, or worse, than the times picayune with their liberal agenda.
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16036 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

Was it an illegal formation on on the spike with 3 seconds left or not?


well there can be no argument on that. It was illegal. You can't have 6 players lined up off the line of scrimmage.
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
27919 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

well there can be no argument on that. It was illegal. You can't have 6 players lined up off the line of scrimmage.

They didn’t.
Posted by AshLSU
Member since Nov 2015
12868 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

According to his explanations, even if a penalty had been called on the alignment for the spike play with "1 second left" there would not have been a time runoff. I don't understand this. If that's truly the case, why not just send the fastest player to the line to spike it regardless of where everyone else is? Based on his explanation, you'd still get to run the next play after what would in essence be another clock stopage and a 5 yd penalty. What am I missing?


Doesn’t any offensive penalty automatically run off 10 seconds?
Posted by AshLSU
Member since Nov 2015
12868 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

In that situation the ball only has to be touched.



Then I’ve seen a lot of “fumbles” in the backfield called incorrectly. All those pile up, ball squirts out, picked up by defense “fumbles”.

How many bad snaps on punts were picked up and either quick kicked or advanced in some way by the punting team?
Posted by DLSWVA
SW Virginia via Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2012
781 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:13 pm to
One more reason not to read the Advocate.
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
27919 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:13 pm to
No.

If the team lines up with a running clock and a penalty is committed that causes the play to be blown dead, and therefore stops the clock, there is a runoff. Think of a false start.

If the penalty isn’t something that would cause the play to be blown dead, then the penalty is marked off and whether the clock runs on the ready for play or snap depends on the outcome of the previous play. In this case an illegal formation does not cause a play to be whistled dead, and the spike stopped the clock.

And it wasn’t an illegal formation anyway.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57479 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

In that situation the ball only has to be touched.

Embarrassing how low football IQ the rant is.
so if a RB fumbles the ball.....if his knee is down and he just touches it, is he down?
Posted by larry289
Holiday Island, AR
Member since Nov 2009
3858 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

Overall LSU was gifted alot a great spots and the refs swallowed their whistles most of the game when we held. That was pretty obvious.

I think this held true for both sides, but the 4th down run at end of regulation the ref gave an extra yard to attain the 1st down should have been challenged by our highly paid coaches...aTm didn't mess around, they knew they were short. The ref let the ball carrier roll a yard on the ground. That would have ended it instead of starting the nightmare.
Posted by nobigdeal69
baton rouge
Member since Nov 2009
2180 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

I think this held true for both sides, but the 4th down run at end of regulation the ref gave an extra yard to attain the 1st down should have been challenged by our highly paid coaches...aTm didn't mess around, they knew they were short. The ref let the ball carrier roll a yard on the ground. That would have ended it instead of starting the nightmare.


Yellow line on telecast was wrong. Read the article.
Posted by AshLSU
Member since Nov 2015
12868 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

so if a RB fumbles the ball.....if his knee is down and he just touches it, is he down?


Then every extra point should be taken away because the ball holder always has his knee down and is touching the ball.


And yet I’ve seen plays where the ball bobbles when he is placing it in position and he picks it up and runs with it. This should not be allowed if all a player has to do is have a knee down and touch the ball with a finger. He shouldn’t be allowed to advance it in any way.
This post was edited on 11/25/18 at 8:34 pm
Posted by tgr4ever
Gwinnett, baw
Member since Jul 2011
16214 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:40 pm to


Incredible that the ref called this ticky tack bullshite. He wanted to go home. If thats a flag then every single goaline fade should be an automatic PI, as well.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
59139 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

Then every extra point should be taken away because the ball holder always has his knee down and is touching the ball.


OK. Now I see that you're trolling.
Posted by hankiba
Member since Feb 2017
325 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:46 pm to
Having nine on the LOS is not illegal. The only eligible receivers are at the end of each side of the ball.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram