- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Advocate outlines possible trouble ahead for Wade and LSU BB
Posted on 4/19/19 at 1:32 pm to Irish LSU Fan
Posted on 4/19/19 at 1:32 pm to Irish LSU Fan
quote:
The NCAA does not operate on proof. They are not a "court of law."
This was posted over on SEC Rant...
quote:
Then again, as noted by Potuto - the former chair of the infractions committee - an NCAA hearing is not a legal proceeding. The NCAA's standard of proof is equivalent to "clear and convincing evidence" in a civil case, such as those involving parental rights, Potuto said.
"The burden of proof doesn't mean each piece of evidence has to reach that burden," she said. "It means in the complete totality of it you can get there, which means you may reject some of it."
LINK
Posted on 4/19/19 at 1:33 pm to Irish LSU Fan
What is the NCAA going to investigate. It won't have wiretap recordings, it won't have Wade testimony under oath, Wade has give his statement, Smart has given his statement, Smart's family has given its comments and the handler has either given a statement or told the NCAA to go pound sand (they can't make him talk to them).
Please let me know what the NCAA is going to investigate? They don't have subpoena power, they can't make people interview, what evidence are they going to get.
Please let me know what the NCAA is going to investigate? They don't have subpoena power, they can't make people interview, what evidence are they going to get.
This post was edited on 4/19/19 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 4/19/19 at 1:34 pm to Irish LSU Fan
why do you hate LSU so much? your constant negativity, your whining about the LSU band and now your whining about WW, there is no way you are an LSU "Fan"
Posted on 4/19/19 at 1:34 pm to Irish LSU Fan
quote:
. We don't want out program's integrity tarnished
Time to grow up Peter Pan. You want a clean program, go root for Vandy.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 1:34 pm to tigerfan88
quote:
Oh yeah remember all the incredible damning circumstantial evidence surrounding Cam Newton’s recruitment, but no actual hard proof?
God the NCAA just hammered them.
At the end of the day the ncaa really only comes down hard when they have actual proof of something. They may investigate incredibly thoroughly based on allegations, but all their punishments are based on some sort of corroborated evidence.
This. And you should never self report shite like Missouri did. That's a bitch move that beta males make like Alleva.
We just told the NCAA to go frick themselves, then hired a big swinging dick as our AD, reinstated our coach, and sent a message that the NCAA is going to have to find a new bitch to be their D1 scapegoat.
They won't do shite, mostly because we now have an AD with some sac and intelligence.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 1:35 pm to Irish LSU Fan
So the Advocate just copy and pasted the excerpt that was released in early March and is trying to attach new meaning to it? Exactly what new angle do you think the Advocate has created here? Sounds like exactly what been said for over a month. No shite he was probably talking about cheating, but without the rest of those tapes, it's not going to matter much.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 1:37 pm to lsufball19
They essentially put a new headline on dated information, clickbait 101. Obviously it works since it fools the likes of the OP
Posted on 4/19/19 at 1:38 pm to Irish LSU Fan
quote:
Right. Except the NCAA is NOT part of the legal system. They DO operate on hearsay and assumption.
today's ruling must really piss you off
The NCAA does not operate on hearsay and assumption btw. They do not have the same exact "rules of procedure" as a court of law but they do have rules of procedure they must follow. You act like because the NCAA is not a court of law that they are the wild west and have no procedure they are bound to follow. Sorry to bust your bubble, but their stated procedure in their own by-laws is very much like a court of law. And you want to know why? Because they don't want to find themselves on the other end of a lawsuit in an actual court of law.
This post was edited on 4/19/19 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 4/19/19 at 1:39 pm to lsufball19
quote:
So the Advocate just copy and pasted the excerpt that was released in early March and is trying to attach new meaning to it?
Pulitzer my arse
Posted on 4/19/19 at 1:40 pm to J2thaROC
quote:
Tunsil
quote:
Since he said he did (got paid) on national tv and all.
#1. Since he said he got paid, it’s not hearsay. It’s an admission and real evidence.
#2. Wasn’t there another player who stated the same thing? Which bolsters his claim and lends credibility.
None of this is true in the context of what’s going on in the case with LSU bb.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 1:41 pm to LordLouisiana
That quote between wade and Dawkins was about a player who will be attending Florida state. So if it’s believed wade paid for him and didn’t get him, how much did FSU pay? That’s why unless they have dollar amounts and actual proof, it’s bull shite!
Posted on 4/19/19 at 1:43 pm to Irish LSU Fan
quote:
Advocate outlines possible trouble ahead for Wade and LSU BB
Fricking hack journalism.
You could write articles every day about what could happen. Report actual news.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 1:44 pm to Irish LSU Fan
The advocate has been pure trash lately. Has Guilbeau been hiding under a rock after his complete hissy fit?
Posted on 4/19/19 at 1:47 pm to Irish LSU Fan
quote:
The FBI has turned down requests from LSU to share copies of the wiretaps or other evidence gathered on Wade. Ramos' ruling Friday morning that Wade won't testify appears to make it very unlikely those wiretaps will be revealed in the courtroom.
It would be highly unusual for the FBI to hand over sealed wiretaps or other evidence that went unused at trial to NCAA compliance officials even after the criminal cases conclude.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 1:47 pm to Irish LSU Fan
Sooooo how the frick is this new now lol. Do you work for yahoo?
Posted on 4/19/19 at 1:49 pm to HamBone14
Not only that, I have a sneaking suspicion Wade's new lawyer knows where the bodies are buried in regard to the blue bloods (see his other major clients miller and pearl still employed after MAJOR SMOKE). The ncaa DOES NOT want to go there with their cash cows. We might get a minor slap to help them save face, but even that is doubtful.
Popular
Back to top



2







