0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A prayer to SATAN.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 2:24 pm to cajunangelle
Posted on 10/7/26 at 2:24 pm to cajunangelle
quote:and youre as dumb as a bag of shite
You are as crazy as cubs. Wow.
You ignorant people who think you're conservative and who think you're Christian but don't understand what's going on you just react to politics and the culture as if it's wrestling
you're an ignorant stupid count bitch. Burn in fricking hell when it comes
clear enough?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 2:26 pm to BoarEd
quote:
More stupidity.
I appreciate you giving me a cliff note on your post instead of typing it all out.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 2:26 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Literally here on contract. Paid to post.
and Circus is getting his money's worth, every penny I've earned
Posted on 10/7/26 at 2:36 pm to 3down10
quote:
False. It was founded on separation of church and state.
This is woefully simplistic & glosses over actual history.
At the time our country's founding, There were the Puritans in Massachusetts, the Quakers in Pennsylvania, thr Catholics in Maryland, and the Anglicans in Virginia.
Which national church could our founding fathers establish when no single religious denomination held a majority across the colonies??
For the federal union to survive, it was politically impossible to establish a national church without alienating large portions of the population and causing immediate civil fracture. Leaders like James Madison and Thomas Jefferson argued that religious peace could only be achieved by putting all CHRISTIAN denominations on an equal footing.
Remember, in late 18th-century America, the population was overwhelmingly of European Christians. There were very few Jewish communities (concentrated in a few port cities like Newport and New York) but there were no Muslims, Buddists, Hindus, etc.
Furthermore, as you know, or at least should know, the American Revolution was fought for our independence from England.
Since the 1530's when Henry VIIi broke w/ Rome & established the Church of England, every other Christian denomination were persecuted in various ways over time.
For instance, ?The Toleration Act of 1689 granted dissenters of the Chirch of England the right to worship publicly if they registered their meeting houses and swore oaths of allegiance. This ended the worst of the 17th-century jailings.
?
However, despite the Toleration Act, dissenters still faced severe civil friction throughout the 1700s. Like Catholics, they were barred from holding public office, municipal positions, or graduating from major universities unless they took communion in the Church of England.
?All British subjects, regardless of whether they were Anglican, Baptist, Quaker, or Catholic, were legally required to pay tithes (taxes) to support their local parish church of the Church of England. Dissenters deeply resented paying to fund a religious institution they didn't belong to.
Therefore, the separation between church & state was to prevent the establishment of a national church. Because again, they couldn't select a Christian denomination w/o alienating the members of all the other Protestant denominations.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 2:37 pm to BoarEd
quote:
First for just being wrong in your stances in the first place
I bet you can't properly articulate my stances in a way that make them wrong.
quote:
and then flat out and obviously lying about other people as a retort to being called out for being wrong.
You ran away from answering basic questions about your own stances
Posted on 10/7/26 at 2:38 pm to OWLFAN86
You just wished me hell as you play a big man on campus on a message board.
Will your gravestone say, king a-hole of tigerdroppings?
You da man, so cool. POS. GFY.
Will your gravestone say, king a-hole of tigerdroppings?
You da man, so cool. POS. GFY.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 2:39 pm to Athis
Posted on 10/7/26 at 2:40 pm to cajunangelle
quote:dont care I'll be dead
Will your gravestone say, king a-hole of tigerdroppings?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 2:41 pm to Udontknow
quote:
This is woefully simplistic & glosses over actual history.
At the time our country's founding, There were the Puritans in Massachusetts, the Quakers in Pennsylvania, thr Catholics in Maryland, and the Anglicans in Virginia.
Which national church could our founding fathers establish when no single religious denomination held a majority across the colonies??
For the federal union to survive, it was politically impossible to establish a national church without alienating large portions of the population and causing immediate civil fracture. Leaders like James Madison and Thomas Jefferson argued that religious peace could only be achieved by putting all CHRISTIAN denominations on an equal footing.
Remember, in late 18th-century America, the population was overwhelmingly of European Christians. There were very few Jewish communities (concentrated in a few port cities like Newport and New York) but there were no Muslims, Buddists, Hindus, etc.
Furthermore, as you know, or at least should know, the American Revolution was fought for our independence from England.
Since the 1530's when Henry VIIi broke w/ Rome & established the Church of England, every other Christian denomination were persecuted in various ways over time.
For instance, ?The Toleration Act of 1689 granted dissenters of the Chirch of England the right to worship publicly if they registered their meeting houses and swore oaths of allegiance. This ended the worst of the 17th-century jailings.
?
However, despite the Toleration Act, dissenters still faced severe civil friction throughout the 1700s. Like Catholics, they were barred from holding public office, municipal positions, or graduating from major universities unless they took communion in the Church of England.
?All British subjects, regardless of whether they were Anglican, Baptist, Quaker, or Catholic, were legally required to pay tithes (taxes) to support their local parish church of the Church of England. Dissenters deeply resented paying to fund a religious institution they didn't belong to.
Therefore, the separation between church & state was to prevent the establishment of a national church. Because again, they couldn't select a Christian denomination w/o alienating the members of all the other Protestant denominations.
Yes, the people who came to the new world and founded the country were trying to get away from the same people who are today trying to get rid of the 1st amendment in order to establish religious laws.
This is why I keep asking which version of Christianity.
At any rate, the senate stated plainly and unanimously in 1797 the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion,
Posted on 10/7/26 at 2:43 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
Because a significant number of our legal practices and traditions enshrined in the Constitution came from the Old Testament And for the Founding Fathers, they were often referring to English law, which again, was founded in much of it upon the Old Testament
What legal traditions come from the Old Testament?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 2:54 pm to Mo Jeaux
Deuteronomy: A final, comprehensive restatement of the covenant and laws given to a new generation before entering the Promised Land.
Major Legal Codes
Ancient Israelite legal traditions developed over centuries and include several overlapping collections:
• The Book of the Covenant: Found in Exodus 20–23, this agrarian and social code addresses property, personal injury, and societal balance.
• The Ten Commandments: Found in Exodus and Deuteronomy, these fundamental moral rules outline core duties toward God and neighbors.
Honor the Lord youre God AND your neighbor as yourself. Christ was catching the Pharisees in their trap for him Had he stopped at honor God and quit right there. They would have said well we are God's representatives here, so what we say is what God says but when He said and your neighbor as yourself he held them to the same standards that they were trying to hold others to
That was inspiration for equal treatment under the law
.
• Deuteronomy: A final, comprehensive restatement of the covenant and laws given to a new generation before entering the Promised Land.
Key Characteristics and Themes
• Divine Authority: Because laws came from God, no earthly king or human leader held a monopoly on lawmaking.
• Local Governance: Early American colonial frameworks—such as the 1639 Fundamental Orders of Connecticut designed by Thomas Hooker—drew inspiration and organizational concepts from leadership selection models found in Deuteronomy (such as Deuteronomy 1:13 regarding wise men and judges).
• Rule of Law and Accountability: Concepts like Lex Rex (the law is king), rooted in biblical passages including Deuteronomy 17, influenced Western political philosophy by establishing that rulers remain subject to higher legal standards rather than possessing absolute divine right.
• Moral Prohibitions: Basic statutory prohibitions against foundational offenses like murder, perjury, and theft align with the moral laws expressed across the Torah and the Ten Commandments, which are reiterated within Deuteronomy.
• Social Equality: Unlike other ancient Near Eastern legal collections (such as the Code of Hammurabi), Israelite law generally did not scale punishments based on social class, avoiding harsher penalties for the poor (with the exception of distinct economic valuations for slaves).
• Casuistic and Apodictic Law: The texts combine absolute moral commands (apodictic, such as "do not murder") with case-by-case conditional rules
If you're really curious read Deuteronomy and get back to me
Major Legal Codes
Ancient Israelite legal traditions developed over centuries and include several overlapping collections:
• The Book of the Covenant: Found in Exodus 20–23, this agrarian and social code addresses property, personal injury, and societal balance.
• The Ten Commandments: Found in Exodus and Deuteronomy, these fundamental moral rules outline core duties toward God and neighbors.
Honor the Lord youre God AND your neighbor as yourself. Christ was catching the Pharisees in their trap for him Had he stopped at honor God and quit right there. They would have said well we are God's representatives here, so what we say is what God says but when He said and your neighbor as yourself he held them to the same standards that they were trying to hold others to
That was inspiration for equal treatment under the law
.
• Deuteronomy: A final, comprehensive restatement of the covenant and laws given to a new generation before entering the Promised Land.
Key Characteristics and Themes
• Divine Authority: Because laws came from God, no earthly king or human leader held a monopoly on lawmaking.
• Local Governance: Early American colonial frameworks—such as the 1639 Fundamental Orders of Connecticut designed by Thomas Hooker—drew inspiration and organizational concepts from leadership selection models found in Deuteronomy (such as Deuteronomy 1:13 regarding wise men and judges).
• Rule of Law and Accountability: Concepts like Lex Rex (the law is king), rooted in biblical passages including Deuteronomy 17, influenced Western political philosophy by establishing that rulers remain subject to higher legal standards rather than possessing absolute divine right.
• Moral Prohibitions: Basic statutory prohibitions against foundational offenses like murder, perjury, and theft align with the moral laws expressed across the Torah and the Ten Commandments, which are reiterated within Deuteronomy.
• Social Equality: Unlike other ancient Near Eastern legal collections (such as the Code of Hammurabi), Israelite law generally did not scale punishments based on social class, avoiding harsher penalties for the poor (with the exception of distinct economic valuations for slaves).
• Casuistic and Apodictic Law: The texts combine absolute moral commands (apodictic, such as "do not murder") with case-by-case conditional rules
If you're really curious read Deuteronomy and get back to me
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 2:56 pm
Posted on 10/7/26 at 2:57 pm to OWLFAN86
See that down vote came way too quickly for someone to have actually read it
Posted on 10/7/26 at 2:59 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
What legal traditions come from the Old Testament?
I couldn't care less about this particular argument, but the answer is quite a few.
The rule of law, the two witness rule, proportionality in punishment, sanctity of private property, and privilege against self incrimination.
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:04 pm to 3down10
quote:and the founding fathers that came here in the 1600s the people that founded this nation at the colony level the representatives that those colonies sent to the Constitutional Congress many of those colonies in states had it as a rule that those men had to be Christian.. Of different denominations but very Christian
At any rate, the senate stated plainly and unanimously in 1797 the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion,
Then as they established the nation they made the point of saying there is no particular Christianity that this nation worships because we do not have an official religion
That does not change the fact that the Founding Fathers were very much Christian the states required them to be Christian members of a Church before they went to the Congress and their writings prove that when they say what their belief system is and why they're founding this new nation
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:06 pm to BoarEd
quote:
These fricking idiots will tell you that when they profess allegiance to Satan and even attend the church of Satan that they are not actual Satanists. And I'm not shitting you here. SFP has pulled this shite many times. "They're just edgelords" despite them literally attending the church of Satan.
Okay great, so he's a Satanist AND an edgelord. BOTH can be true.
I don't care if the guy is really a Satanist. He did this to be a shite-stirrer. That was my point.
quote:
These people actively run interference for Satanists.
I did no such thing.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:09 pm to JDsJersey
quote:
I did no such thing
Apologies if I wasn't clear. I wasn't talking about you.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:10 pm to BoarEd
All good
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:11 pm to BoarEd
I knew you weren't talking about him
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:11 pm to Athis
Leftists in government praying to satan is refreshingly honest.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
I know you knew.
Page 7 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News