- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
A mobile QB is better for the RPO
Posted on 10/23/22 at 7:59 am
Posted on 10/23/22 at 7:59 am
The collective sentiment here was to shite on anyone saying this. But it’s absolutely true. A lot of RPOs are triple options, the Qb can hand off, run, or pass. Also the whole thing is more versatile if the QB is a threat to run. This is not to say the read option is different than RPO, but it all connects.
18
Posted on 10/23/22 at 8:27 am to sabes que
It’s absolutely beneficial, former players and coaches say it all the time. Tell them how they are wrong
Posted on 10/23/22 at 9:02 am to sabes que
In CFB where you only have a few yrs at most to develop a QB, I think a “mobile” QB is a necessity. They all don’t need to be JD fast obviously but they need to be Joey B level runners.
It just unlocks so much more when defenses have to account for the QB running the ball.
It just unlocks so much more when defenses have to account for the QB running the ball.
Posted on 10/23/22 at 9:29 am to sabes que
Totally agree, but you still have to be a passer. Both are needed, but I will always prioritize the passing over the running.
Posted on 10/23/22 at 9:33 am to sabes que
Dude please start yet another thread.
Posted on 10/23/22 at 9:47 am to sabes que
quote:
The collective sentiment here was to shite on anyone saying this. But it’s absolutely true. A lot of RPOs are triple options, the Qb can hand off, run, or pass. Also the whole thing is more versatile if the QB is a threat to run. This is not to say the read option is different than RPO, but it all connects.
Holy word salad, Batman.
Posted on 10/23/22 at 9:51 am to misey94
It’s not word salad if you can understand it. Let me explain it more bluntly, it’s a triple option as in 3 options, if the QB can run, if not it’s only two, that’s one more than one and one less than 3. You get it now?
Posted on 10/23/22 at 9:53 am to sabes que
R = Run …..why the fuk would you have anything different than a mobile qb for RPO lol
Posted on 10/23/22 at 9:55 am to sabes que
Obviously
Posted on 10/23/22 at 9:55 am to burke985
Well the QB can hand it off to the running back, ala Eagles when they won the SB with Foles. But it works best if the defense has to account for the QB keeping it, as well as handing it off or throwing it. I know math is not many peoples strong suits, but 3 is more than 2
Posted on 10/23/22 at 10:08 am to sabes que
quote:Moron. You're a fricking moron.
A mobile QB is better for the RPO
The collective sentiment here was to shite on anyone saying this. But it’s absolutely true. A lot of RPOs are triple options, the Qb can hand off, run, or pass. Also the whole thing is more versatile if the QB is a threat to run. This is not to say the read option is different than RPO, but it all connects.
You could have just stopped when you typed:
quote:
A mobile QB is better
Because the arguments you make in the OP apply to any offense. Spread, I, West Coast, Power, Pistol, Pro-style, Wing-T, Single Wing, Double Wing, etc.
quote:No fricking shite.
the whole thing is more versatile if the QB is a threat to run.
But the point you ignore from the previous threads is this: an RPO does not require a running QB because the play is not designed to have the QB run the ball.
In short: Moron. You're a fricking moron.
Posted on 10/23/22 at 10:10 am to Salviati
It doesn’t require it but it works better with a QB that is a threat to keep. Guaranteed your bitch arse couldn’t start a thread that was in any way thought provoking if your life depended on it.
This post was edited on 10/23/22 at 10:11 am
Posted on 10/23/22 at 10:13 am to Salviati
People who lack understanding like you always say this, “Yes any play is better if the QB can run”, but it’s especially true of RPO and coaches and players recognize this fact.
Posted on 10/23/22 at 10:15 am to sabes que
No shite.
Posted on 10/23/22 at 10:17 am to burke985
quote:
R = Run …..why the fuk would you have anything different than a mobile qb for RPO lol
The run in run-pass option is generally not referring to a QB run lol
Posted on 10/23/22 at 10:18 am to sabes que
quote:
A mobile QB is better for the RPO
A mobile QB is better for everything
This post was edited on 10/23/22 at 10:20 am
Posted on 10/23/22 at 10:21 am to sabes que
quote:
People who lack understanding like you always say this, “Yes any play is better if the QB can run”, but it’s especially true of RPO and coaches and players recognize this fact.
An RPO is just a special form of play action. Regular play action is also helped with a mobile QB
Posted on 10/23/22 at 10:23 am to sabes que
quote:
It’s not word salad if you can understand it. Let me explain it more bluntly, it’s a triple option as in 3 options, if the QB can run, if not it’s only two, that’s one more than one and one less than 3. You get it now?
It’s word salad because it has little basis in reality. Maybe 10 teams in the FBS run triple option other than as an occasional gadget play.
The one read RPO is what the VAST majority of teams run because it’s an easy play that doesn’t take long to develop. You can also run it with any OL and QB. Neither has to be super athletic to pull it off.
It’s nice if you have a mobile QB who can create something if the one read RPO breaks down, but that’s no different than any other busted play.
This post was edited on 10/23/22 at 10:25 am
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News