re: 247 has an article about the refs and bad calls

They didn’t even mention the play where a ref literally blocked for A&M to allow a big gain.

We need some walkons that do nothing but go helmet to skull with dirty refs

After one or two get carted off the field they'll clean up the officiating

quote:

---

Either get used to it or change conferences. 

---

Or start injuring dirty refs

1) most of those are not unbiased observers. Half or more are people that cover LSU for a living.

2) there were two bad missed or blown calls: the missed false start in OT and missing the fumble knee down on the reversed INT in real time.

In both of those cases, it didn’t alone hand the game to A&M.

The 4th & 18 was converted. ESPNs dumbasses had the yellow line two yards off.

The catch fumble was the right call he didn’t catch the bal, make two steps, and then a football move. It sucks as it was a great play, but rules are rules.

The spike was not an illegal formation. Almost everybody was on the line. There is no penalty in college for too many on the line as long as the plyrrs don’t go out for a pass and to be on the line the WRs need to be on the hip of the tackle.

Spike happened in time. The replay clearly showed that, so all of you including that dumbass O need to shut up about it.

The PI was a legit call. Greedy is not infallible and grabbed him once Rogers made his move to the outside. Does it get not called sometimes? Sure, but it wa clearly PI. I am just not someone that thinks you ignore penalties because of the moment. If it’s a penalty in the first quelarterbits always a penalty.

LSU lost that game on their own multiple times. Refs had litter to nothing to do with it. Blame O and his pansy play calling on our last drive in regulation.

quote:

---

LSU Gabe up a game tying TD on the last play of regulation.

And the right call was to put 1 second on the clock.

Don’t bitch about officials when we still could have made a play and win on regulation and multiple times in OT.

Sure the officiating was not great, but god damn, it shouldn’t have even mattered.

---

Even before that it was 4th and 18 with the guy CLEARLY not past or even at the line to convert, yet they gave him over a yard of difference. Game should have been over there.

quote:

---

Guy fell short of the line. I’m not joking. Ball never crossed or even touched the line.

---

Bro, come on. Are you a woman? The yellow line is a broadcast graphic. It is not the official line. It was wrong.

quote:

---

The PI was a legit call. Greedy is not infallible and grabbed him once Rogers made his move to the outside.

---

L. O. L.

quote:

---

The catch fumble was the right call he didn’t catch the bal, make two steps, and then a football move.

---

Two steps is considered a football move, that’s all you have to do.

You don’t have to do both. He definitely took 2 steps after catching the ball.

Had he taken another one it would’ve been a TD

We were that close to making the playoffs and the refs robbed it from us. Ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous.

quote:

---

Can someone explain why the incompletion wasn't challenged? Out of everything, that was the most egregious. Clearly a catch, fumble, game over. Was that on O to challenge?

---

In college football, all plays are reviewed. They looked at it as soon as it happened and deemed the right call was made. They only announce a review of they need more time to decide.

I love LSU but thay was in no way a clear catch and fumble. Rule is usually get control, two feet down and make a football move. He clearly didn’t do that b/c as soon as his second foot hit he got drilled and lost the ball.

I think coaches can’t challenge in OT but might be mistaken.