- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Some rumblings and updates in regards to portal players
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:34 pm to PP7 for heisman
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:34 pm to PP7 for heisman
Ya, if you take out all of Durhams big runs and keep all of Berry’s big runs, he had better numbers.
I’ve never seen such hairs split with two players on the same team in order to confirm a bias
Ole Miss didn’t even have a good run defense. South Carolina’s was better and Florida’s was about the same but seems to have ignored that:
I’ve never seen such hairs split with two players on the same team in order to confirm a bias
Ole Miss didn’t even have a good run defense. South Carolina’s was better and Florida’s was about the same but seems to have ignored that:
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:41 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Wait, you said Berry was more explosive and had better vision blah blah blah
Hey a-hole, point to the post where I said Berry was "more explosive". God, not only can't you evaluate football players or understand math, but you are so stupid you can't even read English. Once again, you think that average ypc is everything. I have pointed out the opponent matters (Durham avoided the tough ones)...that down and distance matters...that consistency matters, etc. And you can try to SCAM this forum like you always try to do, but the FACT remains that the average you like...4.8...drops dramatically to 3.2 ypc by taking away only 5 runs out of over 100 for Durham.
You wanted stats...I gave you multiple stats...DICKHEAD! Try commenting on curling. Football is above your IQ level.
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 4:42 pm
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:47 pm to Geauxldilocks
quote:
Because we need ideally 4 scholarship RNs and signed 0.
Why do we need 4 Nurses?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:01 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Ya, if you take out all of Durhams big runs and keep all of Berry’s big runs, he had better numbers.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:44 pm to NotaStarGazer
quote:
Once again, you think that average ypc is everything.
I posted 9 other stats on page two. Nine!
quote:
point to the post where I said Berry was "more explosive"
WTF are we doing here?
Direct Quotes from you:
"Berry is much quicker on his first step"
"Berry is faster".
"Berry has better change of direction/more shifty"
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:53 pm to Mbeloso
Berry has always wanted to be at LSU. Yes there is a frank connection w his Dad and All that but Coach Smith met with Harlem and his dad yesterday. He will probably be pursued more than Durham imo. They will sell him on return game and all purpose back as he works to get bigger and develop into a primary RB. He's not necessarily built for a 25/30 carry back especially right now. Ryan Clark spoke on this and was Berry's 7-7 bootlegger coach.. he said Berry wasn't a fournette where u hand it to him 25 tomes more of a 15-18 total touches.. kr/pr pass catching mixed w carries... I believe we probably get Lacy and Berry
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:09 pm to Lester Earl
Notice you couldn't quote where I said that Berry was "more explosive". Thanks for admitting you misquoted me. Explosive can also include breaking tackles...it also can include running over tacklers.
Once again you concentrated on ypc average which apparently you are running away from now. BTW, notice you aren't repeating your earlier LIE where you claimed that Durham without his best 5 runs still averaged more than Berry including his best 5 runs. "Ya, if you take out all of Durhams big runs and keep all of Berry’s big runs, he had better numbers"
God man, the more you post, the more you prove you can't evaluate football talent, haven't mastered simple math, and apparently English is a challenge for you also.
Once again you concentrated on ypc average which apparently you are running away from now. BTW, notice you aren't repeating your earlier LIE where you claimed that Durham without his best 5 runs still averaged more than Berry including his best 5 runs. "Ya, if you take out all of Durhams big runs and keep all of Berry’s big runs, he had better numbers"
God man, the more you post, the more you prove you can't evaluate football talent, haven't mastered simple math, and apparently English is a challenge for you also.
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 7:11 pm
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:14 pm to NotaStarGazer
quote:
NotaStarGazer
You're an idiot
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:16 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
Youi're a MORON! Didn't mother restrict your computer usage, PRICK!
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:25 pm to NotaStarGazer
Stop upvoting your own posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:27 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
Stop posting! 
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 7:28 pm
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:31 pm to NotaStarGazer
You post like PJ is looking over your shoulder
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:33 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
You post like you are drunk!
Posted on 12/22/25 at 8:03 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Berry is much quicker on his first step"
"Berry is faster".
"Berry has better change of direction/more shifty
But but but he didnt say explosive. I feel like im supposed to all cap a word.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 8:21 pm to Geaux Tahel
quote:
But but but he didnt say explosive. I feel like im supposed to all cap a word.
Lol
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:04 am to Jim bean xxx
I think we need 5 nurses
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:28 am to Covingtontiger77
You need to keep your day job buddy
Posted on 12/24/25 at 9:20 am to chadr07
quote:
quote:
Durham was better than Berry, even playing hurt. I don't get everyone wanted to boot Durham for Berry.
You weren’t watching the same games we were then. I watched Berry run with way better vision and cutting ability. I saw Durham hit the arse end of linemen for 1 yd and totally missing a wide open hole over and over this year. And getting ran down from behind easily even if he somehow did break one.
I’m really not understanding what you watched to make you believe that Durham looked better than Berry other than you just wanting to go against the grain of everybody else’s opinion just to start an argument.
I think Lester is too critical of Berry, but side with him on Durham. Too many of you discount Durham playing injured. I hope we keep both, and add Lacy. They will have to put their egos in check and trust Lane to use all of them. If you compare our RB stats for last year, you will see that Durham was better than you give him credit for.
Posted on 12/24/25 at 9:27 am to GeauxFish31
quote:
Dylan Stewart will follow Lucas. Everything I’ve heard from USC is that those two are inseparable. Where did you get this info from. Also, who gives a shite about Durham if Lacy comes. It’s Berry we want to keep anyways.
Are you still seeing this about Stewart? I thought he was indicating he is staying at SC.
Plenty of us appreciate Durham's ability. He played hurt and still had better stats than Berry. I love Berry and absolutely want to keep him. But disagree with you on Durham. Lane runs more than he passes. I hope he convinces all 3 to be here. Pay them and use them!
Popular
Back to top


2



