Started By
Message

re: Sims, the Camp thing, and the WR situation

Posted on 1/5/14 at 10:26 am to
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
71486 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Asked Bama what a Scholarship worthy kicker is worth. I have never had a problem offering them How many games have kickers won for us in the Les Miles era? A lot more than Russell Sheppard ever did as a 5* player.


I dont think anyone has a problem with us offering a kicker. However, some folks do have a legitimate gripe about offering a kicker who didn't even start for his own high school team kicking FGs.
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
18823 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 10:32 am to
The goal was to get Sims a D1 scholarship. Just like Nkemdiche successfully did for his friends at Clemson.

How many of these "I want to play with my teammate" work out? Conversely, how many times do the schools get played because they have ZERO leverage in this process?

If we had offered Sims, and in-state kid for us, by LSU's own policy we would have had to honor it. With HINDSIGHT, not that big of deal. Being OOS and Ouachita, Bama can afford to pull some shite where LSU can not. But I bet we still wouldn't have Mr. Roll Tide. Hell, it would have given him the opportunity to maybe string LSU along to signing day.
This post was edited on 1/5/14 at 10:35 am
Posted by saderade
America's City
Member since Jul 2005
26216 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 10:32 am to
quote:

However, some folks do have a legitimate gripe about offering a kicker who didn't even start for his own high school team kicking FGs.
I agree. We have had some good kickers the last 10-15 years and almost all were walk ons.
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 10:32 am to
quote:

But on the surface its looking like a serious case of cutting off the nose to spite the face by not offering Sims.


the problem is "on the surface" means nothing, absolutely zilch. the FACT is, we just don't know what transpired and probably never will. overall, i think LSU is a damn good recruiting team that ranks as one of the best in the nation. to disparage them because you lost a recruit and you don't know why is not fair. sure, you feel better. ok. just don't go start believing shite that will ruin your day; it really does nothing more than that and some of the yo yo's on here will be spewing it as fact.
Posted by Screaming Viking
Member since Jul 2013
5580 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 10:46 am to
Without getting into the details of individual recruits, people need to realize that the higher the ranking of the kid, the lower the percentage that we actually sign them.

The better the kids LSU recruits, the more LSU will miss. Just the nature of the beast when you are competing against the biggest and the best in the country
Posted by MetTiger
Member since Oct 2007
1213 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 10:57 am to
quote:

to disparage them because you lost a recruit and you don't know why is not fair


I'm not disparaging anyone. If you bothered to read the OP, I'm asking for fact.

I'm just saying that our success in Northern LA has been not so good lately. And the last time I looked it was still part of Louisiana. Every other top school in the nation probably sets up their recruiting not in just one player increments. They look at the big picture.

And you uppercased FACT....well GrandDad..the FACT is over the last few years Bama has been eating our lunch in Northern LA (Bell, Devall, Davis, almost RR), not to mention Texas with TD, and now Crob, Hootie, and Sims.

If you don't think that is FACT, maybe you ought to read the newspaper archives and see where they actually didn't sign with LSU.

I am not a nega-Tiger, but when I ask if not offering Sims because he didn't camp was cutting off the nose when many other recruits haven't camped at all, is a valid question.

We are a good recruiting team, but if we didn't understand the potential consequences of not offering Sims - in an area where we haven't done well recently - well then, we have work to do.

No one is infallible, not even the great Nicky at times....

PS: BTW, if you don't think LSU thinks they made a mistake or are having issues in the WM area, then why all of sudden put Brick Haley up there. That's a good thing, but don't act like they couldn't have possibly misplayed that scenario...
This post was edited on 1/5/14 at 10:58 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135101 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 11:03 am to
quote:

That's what they said about Lacy
Lacy was an academic risk that LSU did not need to take. Bama did.
Do you have questions about that?
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
18823 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 11:06 am to
Yes, there's issues in NLA. And they've been discussed at length here.

But, I just want to add to your post that it doesn't seem the fix for Karr/NOLA/SLA is the same as WM/Monore/NLA. While the end result may be about the same, the underlying reasons are different.

And I used the school/city/region nomenclature on purpose. That is because both are not the same, but not real sure exactly where, geographically, each problem lies.

I suspect the Karr kids is limited to Karr (and the Ellis connection) because you can't deny the fact that LSU still has NOLA and SLA success.

The NLA "issue" is a little more complicated. It could be a WM issue (Guice/Kings) and that bled out of WM in this one case to Hootie, giving it the appearance of a City or Regional issue. LSU's success in the region hasn't been near about as good as it was 3 years ago and prior to that.
Posted by lsuhunt555
Teakwood Village Breh
Member since Nov 2008
38961 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 11:07 am to
quote:

He probably won't qualify so it doesn't really matter


If Bama wants a player, he qualifies.
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33843 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 11:19 am to
quote:

I am not a nega-Tiger, but when I ask if not offering Sims because he didn't camp was cutting off the nose when many other recruits haven't camped at all, is a valid question.


When 3 superior WRs actually DO opt to camp with LSU, and you end up offering all of them, why would LSU trip over themselves to get in with a kid that turned his nose up at that school? And answer this without saying because Sims brings Cameron Robinson.
This post was edited on 1/5/14 at 11:23 am
Posted by Surv1vor1st
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2009
1664 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 11:20 am to
LSU should have offered Sims! Now even Tony Brown mentioned wanting to play with Sims Jones and CRob.
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
30365 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 11:21 am to
quote:

* LSU doesn't offer if you dont camp

This is false.
Posted by MetTiger
Member since Oct 2007
1213 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 11:22 am to
Well if things stay as they are, then the Kryptonite not offering Ellis last year and Sims this year, could have far reaching consequences.

I guess my thing is if both Ellis and Sims were playing for LSU - all other things aside, would the program overall have been better off in regards to the other dominoes.

You know, there's some science behind everything - including recruiting. Hopefully lessons are learned from this. A psychology doctoral candidate somewhere is probably doing a dissertation on "The Psychology of College Football Recruiting"
Posted by brodrig
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2003
689 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 11:31 am to
quote:

I would've thought Speedy and GWIII going in opposite directions would tell you that the whole "package deal" rumor is overrated. We could've offered Sims and CRob could just as easily have still gone to Bama. Then we would've been stuck with a WR we didn't really want.


Correct, and then we run the chance of not getting TQ, MD, and SN ( I know we lost him, but if we offer the one we don't want and then miss the one we want because of it, well what's the point?)

bottom line I'll take TQ, MD and the kid from Houston in a heartbeat, CRob was probably going to do what he did no matter what, I just don't get the feel he was ever big to LSU looking at the tweets, rumors etc.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36996 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 11:36 am to
quote:


* Sims doesn't camp at LSU because he'd have to pay
* LSU doesn't offer if you dont camp



depends on who you are. If you are a clearly special prospect you don't need to camp to get an offer. Sims was not a slam dunk prospect and:

quote:

Sims did camp at LSU once before and was miserably bad, that's why we didn't offer. He ran a 4.8 40 and couldnt get any separation


Hope this clears things up
Posted by GeeOH
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2013
13376 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 11:36 am to
quote:

How is that "obvious?"


well, for starters, CR said himself that people were making a mistake discounting his relationship with Simms.

of course that comment was defined by rantards as him "trolling" LSU to offers his friend even though he would still go to Bama. Every time a recruit says something truthful but unpopular to RB clowns, it is defined in a way to make themselves feel better.

Just stupid people being stupid on the rb actually thinking another poster knows better...it's laughable
This post was edited on 1/5/14 at 1:19 pm
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
85358 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Probably not a lot of people will admit it but the staff made a mistake. It's not the 1st time or last time it will happen. Oh yeah and DUCK!!!


And bama didn't offer kwon Alexander or josh williford. So what? They let jameis Winston go cus they already had qbs. So what? They sitting at home while fsu is playing for a title.


We passed on Benton for randle. But I'm guessing we made the wrong choice.

We passed on that dude from Katy everyone flipped about. We got Leonard fournette instead. You win some and lose some. You guys are the idiots.
This post was edited on 1/5/14 at 11:51 am
Posted by MetTiger
Member since Oct 2007
1213 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 11:51 am to
Its all good. Thx to everyone who contributed to this. I think everyone does agree LSU has work to do in northern LA irregardless of why these players decided to go elsewhere. Same probably goes for Karr HS.

But CLM made a positive move with putting Brick up there. As long as the coaches know the truth (or close to it) they can take steps to fix it.

Were just a bunch of guys on here who love LSU football, cant get info fast enough, and really enjoyed seeing Bama get the beatdown the other night.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
85358 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 11:53 am to
quote:

The NLA "issue" is a little more complicated.


Is it? I mean tre white and brandon Harris. But yeah we getting the shite end in nla.

White started as a true frosh. Harris could too. Sims, hootie and crob would not start as true frosh. Not at bama or LSU.
This post was edited on 1/5/14 at 11:56 am
Posted by mtheob17
Charleston, SC
Member since Sep 2009
5475 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

They offered like 125 players while at the same point in time LSU offered like 70


sounds like we're a little more selective.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram