- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: My Grade for this Class (Kinda Long but I Think it's Decent haha)
Posted on 2/3/11 at 10:02 pm to ProjectP2294
Posted on 2/3/11 at 10:02 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
You're thanking me for recognizing that you said I was right?
I was thanking you for being done. I guess I have to take it back.
Posted on 2/3/11 at 10:07 pm to FootballNostradamus
You make a few good points, but most of them irrelevant in the long run. LSU had a great class, like we always do. No need to overanalyze it IMO.
This post was edited on 2/3/11 at 10:10 pm
Posted on 2/3/11 at 10:13 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
You make a few good points, but most of them irrelevant in the long run. LSU had a great class, like we always do. No need to overanalyze it IMO.
Truth. Hard to do much else when you're in Houston and people are acting like the Japs are about to invade because there's a 20% chance of an inch of snow tomorrow.
Posted on 2/3/11 at 10:16 pm to FootballNostradamus
quote:
I truly believe Chavis has been moving safeties to OLBs more out of necessity and not out of desire.
Well your belief aside, Chavis did it his entire career as DC in Tennessee. This is from an article when he first arrived at LSU:
"LSU head coach Les Miles had discussed the possibility of moving a safety to the Sam linebacker position earlier in the spring, but the team had held off until Monday.
“They mentioned it (earlier), but they never said who it was going to be,” Coleman said. “This could benefit me a lot. I’m closer to the line. I like to tackle.”
New defensive coordinator John Chavis has converted safeties to the role of Sam (strongside) linebacker during his long, successful run at Tennessee."
Published: Apr 14, 2009
You're obviously wrong. Not trying to be rude but your gripe about scheme should have no affect on the coaches' LB recruiting rating, since they are recruiting for what they want. You are the one who said you're trying to be objective....I'm trying to help you (even though objectivity is impossible)
quote:
I don't feel there are many elite playmakers in the names you mentioned. Obviously I know the coaches' opinions hold much more water than mine, and I have no doubt Chavis could mold them into something serviceable I just get giddy thinking about what he could do with someone like Anthony or Steward.
That is your opinion and I can respect that. I believe that Chavis is a premiere LB coach and that at least a few of these guys will emerge as good SEC LBs.
As an aside I think it would be wise to look at the amount of top 5 (nationally) LSU defenses since 2001 and you will not find almost any big name LBs. At least not when they arrived.
quote:
This is a good way to set a strong edge, but it leaves your interior vulnerable.
Not with superior DT play, and Chavis likes to stop the run with numbers. Every defense has its weaknesses.
Posted on 2/3/11 at 10:29 pm to Ebbandflow
quote:
Well your belief aside, Chavis did it his entire career as DC in Tennessee. This is from an article when he first arrived at LSU:
"LSU head coach Les Miles had discussed the possibility of moving a safety to the Sam linebacker position earlier in the spring, but the team had held off until Monday.
“They mentioned it (earlier), but they never said who it was going to be,” Coleman said. “This could benefit me a lot. I’m closer to the line. I like to tackle.”
New defensive coordinator John Chavis has converted safeties to the role of Sam (strongside) linebacker during his long, successful run at Tennessee."
Published: Apr 14, 2009
You're obviously wrong. Not trying to be rude but your gripe about scheme should have no affect on the coaches' LB recruiting rating, since they are recruiting for what they want. You are the one who said you're trying to be objective....I'm trying to help you (even though objectivity is impossible)
Not trying to beat a dead horse or stand by my opinion til death do us part, but again I think it has always been out of necessity. We can both agree that prefers speed over size so if he had to pick one he'll go with speed. This is what he's done so far at LSU and did at Tennessee.
However, I think it was out of necessity at Tennessee as well. Tennessee just doesn't produce many athletic freaks, and so he had to move safeties down to get the speed he needed. I just can't wait to see what he could do with someone who could move but also has prototypical size (like Anthony or Steward).
quote:
That is your opinion and I can respect that. I believe that Chavis is a premiere LB coach and that at least a few of these guys will emerge as good SEC LBs.
Definitely agree with his coaching abilities.
quote:
As an aside I think it would be wise to look at the amount of top 5 (nationally) LSU defenses since 2001 and you will not find almost any big name LBs. At least not when they arrived.
True but it's because the state very seldomly produces elite LBs.
quote:
Not with superior DT play, and Chavis likes to stop the run with numbers. Every defense has its weaknesses.
Agreed.
Posted on 2/3/11 at 10:41 pm to FootballNostradamus
Your starting to bury your original argument. I've had to many cocktails, so I'm not even going to attempt to logically follow this argument from the start, but I think it started out how our coaches dropped the ball by not landing certain LB recruits. It just seems to me like if these type recruits are so difficult to land (so difficult, that Chavis has had to alter his coaching style over the years) that maybe our coaches didn't lay such an egg after all by not signing them. I have absolutley no desire to re-read this entire argument to nit pick, but that's just my once over intial impression.


Posted on 2/3/11 at 11:07 pm to FootballNostradamus
quote:It also could be that Mathieu is just a freak off the edge. Did you see how many plays he made this year from that position?? I wouldn't have wanted any other player on the team coming off of the edge other than him this year. HE WAS FREAKING UNBELIEVABLE!! In fact, he will probably continue to perform this role next year on 3rd and long downs even though he will be our starting CB. Why?? B/c he so damn good at it. I personally do not want anyone else filling that role other than him for the next 3 years. He's that good.
That's why you see us running so many under fronts and bringing Mathieu off the edge so much.
Secondly, Chavis used this defense primarily on 2nd and 3rd and long. There was not a huge need to reinforce the interior defense on second and third and long, and therefore the addition of another LB on the field is useless. Just my opinion.
Posted on 2/3/11 at 11:13 pm to FootballNostradamus
quote:
He can't be worse than Crowton
You do realize crowton does zero recuiting. I was actually surprised he was out recruiting mettenberger. Prob last ditch effort to save his job. Any one who recruits would be an upgrade from crowton.
Posted on 2/3/11 at 11:15 pm to FootballNostradamus
quote:
What do you think was more difficult, LSU getting 3 instate 5 stars to sign or Clemson getting 4 out-of-state 5 stars to sign after having a losing record? If LSU's coaches get an A+ then do Clemson's get an A++++++?
1. clemsons class over all is not better than ours
2. clemson needs to win the acc first before them getting 4 5 stars even matter.
3. Getting two five stars to anchor your d line and O line is better than gettin 2-5 star LBs.
4. IMO, Landry is the best wr in this class.
This post was edited on 2/4/11 at 12:19 am
Posted on 2/3/11 at 11:17 pm to FootballNostradamus
quote:
Good thing no coach has ever been wrong! And like I said, this constant need to move safeties to OLB has really hurt us at times on defense.
Ok so what do you propose? Fire the DC? So you are blaming the coaches for trying to get players that fit the system they want to run?
Posted on 2/3/11 at 11:28 pm to FootballNostradamus
quote:
Right. LSU signed Peterson because Clemson didn't put in the effort. They had a great shot with him but decided to focus their efforts elsewhere. Also on your "effort" argument, Clemson is much closer to Florida and they recruit there constantly so would you really make the argument that they would put in less effort for a Florida kid than LSU would?
This is so stupid. Les miles got the best player out of florida that year. And i bet they put shite ton of "effort" into that. Oh and guess what? we had two sr cb's. So once again the coaches filled a glaring need getting peterson.
Some people will never be happy. Last year it was we werent getting enough guys from Louisiana, this year we got too many? WTF?
Posted on 2/4/11 at 1:08 am to FootballNostradamus
quote:
FootballNostradamus
You suck
Posted on 2/4/11 at 10:22 am to dgnx6
quote:
This is so stupid. Les miles got the best player out of florida that year. And i bet they put shite ton of "effort" into that. Oh and guess what? we had two sr cb's. So once again the coaches filled a glaring need getting peterson.
Some people will never be happy. Last year it was we werent getting enough guys from Louisiana, this year we got too many? WTF?
You need reading comprehension classes. I was trying to say that they did have to put a ton of effort into getting Peterson out of Florida. The poster was saying you can't compare the teams because you can't quantify how much effort each put into getting certain players, and I was saying LSU took studs out of Florida not scrubs and had to put as much effort into them as any team.
Posted on 2/7/11 at 12:26 pm to FootballNostradamus
Frank Wilson is the recruiter of the year.
C on the coaches part my arse.
LINK
Read where Frank says it is not as easy to recruit Louisiana as some people think.
C on the coaches part my arse.
LINK
Read where Frank says it is not as easy to recruit Louisiana as some people think.
This post was edited on 2/7/11 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 2/7/11 at 3:18 pm to BigEdLSU
the only part of this I agree with is the rercruitment and philospy Chavis has with outside linebackers. While the speedy smallish type works for the most part when we play teams that you can over power at the line, when you lose the edge because the linebackers can't fight off pulling guards and tackles it's a problem.
Posted on 2/7/11 at 3:31 pm to TigerFanNKaty
If Frank Wilson was named THE recruiter of the year, I would have to assume that gets an A+ grade.
What grade did the other coaches get to "average" a C grade?
What grade did the other coaches get to "average" a C grade?
Posted on 2/7/11 at 3:31 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
I'm much more excited about our class than the overall ranking would indicate. Not a bad overall ranking but my feelings are this class is top five without a doubt and the ESPN rankings make me shake my head. Again, frick ESPN and their coverage yesterday. Just a terribly slanted job.
SI ranking of 4th which I felt was the most accurate.
Posted on 2/7/11 at 3:51 pm to athletemed
quote:
second...how can an b-/C recruiting job bring in an A/A- class...
Some people are not going to give Les credit no matter what.
quote:
Let's be honest there are simply some states that are easier to recruit to than others. A state like Louisiana where you have a continent-sized amount of talent and studs everywhere plus only one flagship school is basically a recruiting Casino where you're Rainman.
Let me guess. You weren't a fan before 2000, were you?
quote:
South Carolina didn't produce a single 5 star this year whereas Louisiana produced 3

And FYI, according to Rivals:
Louisiana had 3 five stars in 2011, 0 five stars in 2010, 3 in 2009, 0 in 2008, 2 in 2007 and 1 in 2006.
South Carolina had 1 in 2006, 1 in 2007, 2 in 2008, 0 in 2009, 1 in 2010 and 1 in 2011.*
That's a difference of 3 five stars in 6 years. I think the biggest difference is the depth of 4 stars.
*(These include A.J. Green, Carlos Dunlap, DaQuan Bowers, Marcus Lattimore and Jadeveon Clowney)

quote:
The saving graces of this coaching staff when it comes to recruiting are Wilson and Cooper.
I think Gonzo and Stud are also considered top notch recruiters. Don't overlook Miles though. He can close the deal as well as any head coach.
quote:
I mentioned that this was one of the deepest LB classes in a long time.
Not in Louisiana. We tried to go out of state, and got one of the four. The other LBers stayed close to home. Can't complain about that too much.
quote:
My second critique is our move away from East Texas. I don't know who was supposed to be recruiting this area but they severely dropped the ball this year (and of all the years to do-so). I know there's tons of recruits in Florida but it's so much farther and there's not the LSU contingent like there is in East Texas.
Such as who? We got Randle and Jenkins. Besides Collins, Mett, Rivers and Hairston, everyone else is from Louisiana. Who did you want from East Texas (who didn't sign with Texas, aTm or OU) and who would you have dropped?
Posted on 2/7/11 at 4:54 pm to FootballNostradamus
quote:
Considering LSU has never signed the number 1 class under Miles
Rarely is there a consensus #1 class. We did however, sign the #1 class in 2009 according to ESPN. ESPN Recruiting - Class Rankings
Popular
Back to top
