- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/2/21 at 3:35 pm to fatboydave
quote:
Silently committed
Silently signed. Big difference
Posted on 1/2/21 at 3:36 pm to whitefoot
quote:
Then the coaches knew already. The player is obligated to inform coaches recruiting him that he signed already or it's a violation. I guarantee you Clemson isn't going to risk a violation just so some kid can keep his signing under wraps for a few weeks.
This is not true in the slightest. Bama did it to us with Womack a few years ago and we got in trouble after it came out that he already signed. It's already been disclosed that recruits and coaches didn't know. He didn't even tell Caleb Williams, who is supposed to be one of his closest friends.
Posted on 1/2/21 at 3:36 pm to jbraua
Amazed that stayed under wraps, if true, considering he would have had to notify the other schools recruiting him.
Posted on 1/2/21 at 3:37 pm to Rouge
Unless the other coaches were properly informed, this is trash-human behavior.
These are grown men working a tough job, with families. Stringing them along falsely is wrong. (I don’t care about fans)
I do believe LSU knew, however, but I don’t know if they were told directly.
The NCAA should actually outlaw this, because any coach that continued to contact Leigh was committing recruiting violations.
These are grown men working a tough job, with families. Stringing them along falsely is wrong. (I don’t care about fans)
I do believe LSU knew, however, but I don’t know if they were told directly.
The NCAA should actually outlaw this, because any coach that continued to contact Leigh was committing recruiting violations.
Posted on 1/2/21 at 3:37 pm to Jugular Joe
quote:
What a shytty human being.
Why? You have no idea what he told coaches behind the scenes. Other than a couple of tweets in the last few days, it's been pretty quiet.
Posted on 1/2/21 at 3:44 pm to Chalkywhite84
It's one thing to silently committed/signed with another school, but it's another to have both the guy and his family doing this extra BS to draw attention to yourself. Just don't say anything. If you wanted to wait until January to announce, fine. But the other little stunts weren't necessary.
Posted on 1/2/21 at 3:46 pm to Chalkywhite84
Makes me so happy Clemson got their shite pushed in last night and Tristan’s momma might want to lose a lot of weight with her fat lying self if she wants to be around longer
Posted on 1/2/21 at 3:47 pm to Chalkywhite84
quote:eh, we needed to be just as snakey.
That's some snake shite
We needed to get moms a job in BR. The latest to make that happen was about the time he failed to make his tOSU trip.
We needed to have her lined up for some interviews by Oct.
My suggestion was with the state health department actually. Can't remember when I posted that, but since OLOL had too many eyes on them that was the logical place as far as I was concerned.
Posted on 1/2/21 at 3:48 pm to sheeeeeit
quote:
This is not true in the slightest. Bama did it to us with Womack a few years ago and we got in trouble after it came out that he already signed. It's already been disclosed that recruits and coaches didn't know.
That’s not what happened with Womack. He signed a financial aid agreement with LSU in July and planned to enroll early, which meant LSU could have unlimited contact with him. But then he decided to stay in HS another semester, decommitted, and signed with Bama on NSD (in February).
I’m not sure when he actually committed to Bama, but he didn’t sign until national signing day. There was no early signing period yet, which is why LSU only had a financial aid agreement. So LSU didn’t get penalized for contacting a recruit that was already signed to another school - they got penalized for having unlimited contact with a recruit who didn’t ultimately enroll at LSU. There’s a difference.
Posted on 1/2/21 at 3:54 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
The NCAA should actually outlaw this, because any coach that continued to contact Leigh was committing recruiting violations.
My understanding is that coaches can verify with the NCAA whether a recruit has signed anywhere. I would assume this is common practice as Leigh wouldn’t be the first player to sign silently.
Posted on 1/2/21 at 3:54 pm to lostinbr
I’m going to guess the staff was informed.
Posted on 1/2/21 at 3:55 pm to lostinbr
quote:
My understanding is that coaches can verify with the NCAA whether a recruit has signed anywhere. I would assume this is common practice as Leigh wouldn’t be the first player to sign silently.
There is zero chance the coaches didn't know he had signed.
Posted on 1/2/21 at 4:00 pm to whitefoot
Would this be violation by Clemson?
This post was edited on 1/2/21 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 1/2/21 at 4:00 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
Things are different nowadays, the parents are in on it. My parents would have never allowed me to do anything like that and if I did I would have probably been disowned for shaming the family. The younger generation just plays by new rules which is there aren’t any rules. Your social standing is now how popular you are on social media. I was in college way back when you still had to have a .edu email account to have a Facebook.
Posted on 1/2/21 at 4:02 pm to jbraua
I’m not going to blame a 17 year old kid for this. This is just awful parenting. The parents going along with it is my reasoning for this
Posted on 1/2/21 at 4:10 pm to lostinbr
quote:You can verify a LOI from the NLI. It has to be turned into the conference within 24 hrs. of signing. It must be accompanied by a financial aid agreement.
My understanding is that coaches can verify with the NCAA whether a recruit has signed anywhere. I would assume this is common practice as Leigh wouldn’t be the first player to sign silently.
However, you do not HAVE to sign a LOI. You can sign financial aid papers (if you want a scholarship) and then enroll. Until enrolled, you are still a recruit. Thus Clemson could not mention him by name (on open channels that is) and is not required to disclose anything.
Additionally, since not enrolled yet and still a recruit LSU or any school was not in contact rule violation. You can't contact players.
The Womack situation is a different set of rules. Bama tried to bait us into the same thing with Hootie actually but we didn't take the bait.
- You can sign multiple FA papers with different schools. What matters is which one you enroll in.
- Under recruiting rules if a recruit signs FA papers then you can initiate contact during no-contact periods (just not do in-homes or evaluations at HS).
- So, in the case of Womack (or Hootie) who had FA papers signed with both LSU and Bama, they decommitted during a dead period. Meaning either school could call him.
- BUT, that exception has a quirk. If the player does not enroll in your school and you made contact under the FA papers signed exception, it is retroactively a violation.
In the case of Hootie when he de-committed during a dead period he "put out the word", through message boards such as this and a helping hand from 247, that he wanted LSU to contact him now that he had decommitted. If LSU had, he enrolls at Bama and LSU gets whacked.
In the case of Womack LSU took the chance because 247 was putting out the idea that he was decommitting to go to Ole Miss. So our staff thought that since Bama wasn't involved it was safe. But in the end that Ole Miss stuff was misdirection on behalf of Bama to sucker us. It was Bama all along with some "recruiting media" help.
So unless Leigh enrolls, which is verifiable with the NCAA (or ACC), we can still contact him. IF he signs a LOI in the next window before enrolling, verifiable with the NLI, we can't.
Popular
Back to top


1


