Started By
Message

Is CLK going to sign 15 to 20 every year and save places for transfers?

Posted on 6/7/26 at 5:52 pm
Posted by DeafVallyBatnR
Member since Sep 2004
19014 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 5:52 pm
I guess I am thinking saving money for proven college talent instead of spending a lot of money on HS kids.
Posted by TigerMonkey7
Member since Jul 2021
4959 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 6:02 pm to
I would say yes. Around 20 high school and 15-17 ish transfers seems to the sweet spot.
Posted by TT18
Member since Nov 2024
48 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 6:29 pm to
He took this job to build the program through high school recruiting
Posted by VerbalKint
Member since Jun 2017
4309 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 7:05 pm to
Hold up, I’ll ask him.
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
28181 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 7:16 pm to
i would think that, yes, this is going to be his MO...

the question will be how much will boosters continue to pony up, year after year, to see him produce results...
Posted by sunnydaze
Member since Jan 2010
32976 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 7:28 pm to
quote:

took this job to build the program through high school recruiting


You can’t build a team through high school recruiting anymore

Only 30% or so of each class will stay
Posted by Hold That Tiger 10
Member since Oct 2013
25789 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

the question will be how much will boosters continue to pony up, year after year, to see him produce results...


Perhaps that answer depends on the results.
Posted by BrianKellysbuyout
Member since Nov 2025
1916 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 8:34 pm to
Sign all of the high school recruits you can, fill in holes with the transfer portal.
Posted by lsufanva
sandston virginia
Member since Aug 2009
13680 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 9:09 pm to
In the system as currently constructed, yes. Be crazy not to. When the 1 transfer rule becomes the standard, HS recruiting will be paramount to sustained success.

Elite/starter level kids in a largely condensed portal market will be extremely expensive due to scarcity, particularly at the priority positions, QB, WR OT, Edge/DE, DT and CB. Will be much cheaper to pay them as hs recruits, develop and then retain them. Most starter level kids will save the 1 time transfer for when the market is most beneficial, about 3 years down the road.
Posted by Midtiger farm
Member since Nov 2014
6344 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

Sign all of the high school recruits you can


fricking stupid strategy
Sign all the elite hs guys you can that will be able to help you win as freshman and sophomores

USC signed 35 hs kids last year
60% will be gone in 2 years
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
28181 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 10:40 pm to
ain't no pehaps... it will 1000% depend on the result
Posted by BrianKellysbuyout
Member since Nov 2025
1916 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 2:27 am to
That's why you fill in holes in the portal. Keep the HS recruits that add to the roster, let the ones go that don't.
Posted by Midtiger farm
Member since Nov 2014
6344 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 6:29 am to
quote:

That's why you fill in holes in the portal. Keep the HS recruits that add to the roster, let the ones go that don't.


But you don’t need to waste time and money bringing developmental kids in here so they can just leave

Bring in 18-20 high quality hs kids then go to the portal

A 21-22 year portal 3*-4* is way more valuable than a 18 year old one
Posted by ExpoTiger
Member since Jul 2014
7597 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 7:35 am to
quote:

He took this job to build the program through high school recruiting


Lmao. A third of his class will be key portal additions. This is the way now. Can’t count on these highschool kids sticking around until they are ready to be leaders. Gotta bring guys in.
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
29016 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

He took this job to build the program through high school recruiting


No that's not why he took the job, he took the job because LSU brand sells itself and LSU has money for players. All he has to do is not frick it up and he will have everything he needs to win a natty or 4
Posted by Sissidog02
Member since Jan 2020
7549 posts
Posted on 6/10/26 at 3:56 pm to
The other question is how many more boosters will boost more if he wins big. Glass half full
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96115 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 5:36 am to
quote:

I guess I am thinking saving money for proven college talent instead of spending a lot of money on HS kids.


The modern (post 2019) era of football is vastly different in nearly every way. There is no more player development.

You're going to get most reps out of about 45 kids, including special teams. You will have another tier of about a dozen or so who will provide some meaningful situational reps (the pure specialists, mainly, including return men).

And the rest you're either overpaying for, are injured or will transfer. Every team will be a radically new roster with a few core holdovers from the previous year. That's reality. That's the situation on the ground. If we do not have the best coaching staff for that reality in 2026, I would be highly shocked.

But everyone will adapt to it. You have to be good, rich and/or lucky to succeed and hopefully we're all 3 "enough" to get to the playoffs in 2026.
Posted by Blueghost1978
Metairie, LA
Member since Jan 2024
932 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 8:27 am to
Wrong. He took the job because it gave him a better opportunity to win championships.

In today’s world of NIL and unrestricted transfer portal movement, championships are won by building elite rosters, and the fastest way to do that is through exceptional portal additions year after year. High school recruiting still matters, but it’s the foundation—not the primary driver of success anymore.

Kiffin didn’t come here to “build the program through high school recruiting.” He came here to win, and in 2026 that means leveraging every avenue available, especially the transfer portal.
Posted by Smokin Joe Dumas
Armchair QB
Member since Apr 2022
2338 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 8:54 am to
quote:

especially the transfer portal.


Somewhat agree. But I think a lot of people underestimate the impact of player retention for important players and positions. This, more than anything else is key because of continuity.

You can see that in how hard he worked to get certain players that he valued to come back out of the portal after they had entered (Durham, Spears, etc.) and kept others from entering (Pickett, and others).
Posted by TigerFanFromBama
Pike Road, AL
Member since Mar 2015
4900 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 8:58 am to
Probably so... A lot of of coaches trying to avoid wasting dead money on HS recruits they know will take at least two seasons to contribute. No point in paying a kid NIL money for him to sit for two seasons and they transfer out transfer out after Year Two.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram