- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Foster over Goodrich for the following reasons
Posted on 1/19/18 at 1:20 pm to ipodking
Posted on 1/19/18 at 1:20 pm to ipodking
He has those schools after Jim for the same reason we are, don't have one in the class and the pickings are slim. He wouldn't have any of those after him if this were the summer.
Its not what we have that would cause him to not see the field, it's what he has or doesn't have. Why take a kid youre gonna recruit over just because? He's not gonna play for a couple of seasons most likely so you take the kid likely to help sooner at another position of great need.
Those other schools also have good depth at qb and guys that have experience so they can take a project and not worry. For us I'd rather not take a project just for depth. Not at qb
Its not what we have that would cause him to not see the field, it's what he has or doesn't have. Why take a kid youre gonna recruit over just because? He's not gonna play for a couple of seasons most likely so you take the kid likely to help sooner at another position of great need.
Those other schools also have good depth at qb and guys that have experience so they can take a project and not worry. For us I'd rather not take a project just for depth. Not at qb
Posted on 1/19/18 at 1:27 pm to Ltown_tiger
So what 2 we need to take?? Since we have so many 2019 Qbs looking at us. Most good qbs are commited already and have no interest in Lsu.
Posted on 1/19/18 at 1:32 pm to lsufanva
That "project" label for Foster is BS. All QBs are projects. Brennan and Narcisse are both still projects but will be fighting for the starting job. The need for development is no reason to turn down Foster.
Posted on 1/19/18 at 1:32 pm to Reda LSU
We seem to be in a good spot for Grant Gunnell next year.
So whoever takes the reins this year, Brennan or Narcisse, I would venture to say Grant will be the next QB at LSU.
And if thats the case, Foster would likely never be a meaningful player.
Also, Foster's accuracy problems aren't a good sign of things to come.
So whoever takes the reins this year, Brennan or Narcisse, I would venture to say Grant will be the next QB at LSU.
And if thats the case, Foster would likely never be a meaningful player.
Also, Foster's accuracy problems aren't a good sign of things to come.
Posted on 1/19/18 at 1:40 pm to Ltown_tiger
There is absolutely NO WAY I would take Foster over Goodrich if they both were fighting over the last spot.
NO WAY
NO WAY
Posted on 1/19/18 at 1:40 pm to Reda LSU
LSU has a history of developing really good defensive back. LSU has a shitty history (recent history) not developing QBs. Why waste someone’s talent?
Posted on 1/19/18 at 1:55 pm to Section225
Some of y'all have adopted the Les Miles way of recruiting QBs. The "Ahhh frick it. We will just wait until next recruiting cycle" plan.
Posted on 1/19/18 at 2:29 pm to ipodking
quote:
Y'all are acting like LSU has the pick of the litter of future QBs
This is so true.
Posted on 1/19/18 at 2:45 pm to lsufanva
quote:
Those other schools also have good depth at qb and guys that have experience so they can take a project and not worry. For us I'd rather not take a project just for depth. Not at qb
I don't really understand what you're saying here. Because we don't have good depth at quarterback, it's better not to take a QB this year? How do we build depth if we don't take guys and try and develop them?
I think almost every high school quarterback is a project. There are very few sure things at quarterback. Go back and look at how hit and miss the top guys are every year. Go look at the quarterbacks that got drafted the last several years and where they were ranked coming out of high school. They come from all over the rankings.
I'm really on the fence here, but I'm starting to lean towards wanting Foster. But, hopefully we can get that counter back for Seth Stewart and be in position to take both. I guess time will tell.
Posted on 1/19/18 at 2:48 pm to ipodking
quote:
Some of y'all have adopted the Les Miles way of recruiting QBs. The "Ahhh frick it. We will just wait until next recruiting cycle" plan.
And anointing guys who haven't done anything without having meaningful competition.
Posted on 1/19/18 at 2:49 pm to whitefoot
quote:
Some of y'all have adopted the Les Miles way of recruiting QBs. The "Ahhh frick it. We will just wait until next recruiting cycle" plan.
I just dont think there is any point in taking another Rob Bolden, Jarrard Randall, Anthony Jennings, Justin McMillian type QB that will never end up playing or developing into a long term answer at QB.
You wanna take a QB then fine take a transfer who has shown something instead of low end QB that has LSU running third or maybe even 4th behind Bama, FSU, and A&M.
Ill take a solid CB/ATH prospect like Goodrich that can be used in many different ways.
Posted on 1/19/18 at 3:04 pm to Section225
quote:
I just dont think there is any point in taking another Rob Bolden, Jarrard Randall, Anthony Jennings, Justin McMillian type QB that will never end up playing or developing into a long term answer at QB.
The more I look at this, the more I'm convinced that it's just extremely difficult to evaluate high school quarterbacks and that there's no telling which prospects turn into one of these guys and which prospects turn into Jared Goff. Jennings was the 14th rated pro passer in 2013. Goff was the 15th rated guy that year. Brandon Harris was the 3rd ranked dual threat guy in 2014. Quentin Flowers was 9th.
I think the reality is, most guys end up like the guys you named, so you have to play the percentages and keep taking guys hoping a couple end up panning out.
Posted on 1/19/18 at 3:42 pm to Reda LSU
I also concur after seeing there aren't many top flight quarterbacks looking our way next season outside possibly Mumphrey and the young man from Warren Easton.
We need a QB thus class and hopefully Foster commits.
2020 is the year where Louisiana will produce some big time QB with the kid from Ponchy, WM, and Zachary. All in line for greatness if they progress as they have been already.
We need a QB thus class and hopefully Foster commits.
2020 is the year where Louisiana will produce some big time QB with the kid from Ponchy, WM, and Zachary. All in line for greatness if they progress as they have been already.
Posted on 1/19/18 at 4:47 pm to Reda LSU
quote:
We are going to need QB depth after missing out on targets this year.
2019 is absolutely stacked at CB. Why take a pretty good CB when we can get a great, if not, amazing CB next year.
I think the margin is very thin on which way the staff will/should go if both are an option..
While the majority on here seem to be tending towards taking Goodrich and waiting for a QB in 2019, I think I agree with you.
I don't have high confidence on any of the QBs on our board actually signing here in 2019, so we should take anyone with a resume like Fosters and smile.
It shouldn't scare anyone off in 2019 and we are definitely much closer to being screwed at the QB position than CB. One transfer after this season and 1 injury in 2020 and we're starting a walk-on or someone who isn't currently on the roster.
That being said, I kind of get the feeling that it won't be a "problem." Foster will probably sign elsewhere.
Posted on 1/19/18 at 8:22 pm to Reda LSU
We have 4 eligible qbs going into next season! McMillian, Brennan, Narcisse, & the transfer from the small school who needs depth??? Are you people crazy? Take goodwich!
Posted on 1/19/18 at 11:34 pm to BlackTiger89
I'm just floored at how many people are saying they definitely would take Goodrich. It seems like a bunch of bandwagoners. It's ok if you're saying it to soften the sting if we don't land Foster, but there's not a shadow of a doubt that we need him.
Posted on 1/20/18 at 12:41 am to tFearIsReal
Gunnel is committed to Texas AM and I'm sure Fisher is going to do everything to keep him. Why do people feel we are going to get him? If we don't get Foster this year there is a good chance we are going to wind up taking a couple long shot, Lindsey Scott, types next season just out of desperation. Seems we have to take Foster if we can this year.
Posted on 1/20/18 at 12:49 am to boxcar willie
We have plenty of time to get on a QB for the next recruiting cycle. Goodrich is a better prospect and stands a much better chance of being a significant contributor. Goodrich is the choice.
Posted on 1/20/18 at 7:35 am to thunderbird1100
Chances are better at QB next year, let’s gamble!
Popular
Back to top
