- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Bauer Sharp's Transfer Rating
Posted on 12/14/24 at 10:28 am
Posted on 12/14/24 at 10:28 am
On3 - 90.00 4star
247 - 87.00 3star
Kind of a big discrepancy. The scores are usually a lot closer.
247 - 87.00 3star
Kind of a big discrepancy. The scores are usually a lot closer.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 10:30 am to GMoney2600
Does this mean he’s good or not good?
Posted on 12/14/24 at 10:31 am to GMoney2600
Supposedly just struggles with blocking but is a decent receiving threat. One site probably values one more than the other from the TE position.
This post was edited on 12/14/24 at 10:33 am
Posted on 12/14/24 at 10:32 am to BiggaGeauxrilla
Well we need a blocking TE
Posted on 12/14/24 at 10:35 am to GMoney2600
He’s a tiger now so I don’t really care.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 10:38 am to 225Tyga
If he's masons replacement, then he's a high rated 4 star. If we want him to block he's a low 3 star.
Ratings are just guesses based off production or highly rated of high school. This kid has solid production, vs a womack who's done nothing yet but looks like he could be a freak and have explosive year.
All depends on how guys will be used in systems.
Hes a really solid get for us, and just need blocking te now. If we go and get another solid starting level te, you'll see Kelly run more 2 te run sets like he used to at notre dame. Allows for some easy play action too.
Ratings are just guesses based off production or highly rated of high school. This kid has solid production, vs a womack who's done nothing yet but looks like he could be a freak and have explosive year.
All depends on how guys will be used in systems.
Hes a really solid get for us, and just need blocking te now. If we go and get another solid starting level te, you'll see Kelly run more 2 te run sets like he used to at notre dame. Allows for some easy play action too.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 10:45 am to BiggaGeauxrilla
Kelly said in his presser that what he liked about him was his physicality. I see him as a better blocker but slightly less talented pass catcher compared to Taylor.
He's a pretty good mix of a blocking TE that can catch a lot of balls too.
Love to see us outbid others for the Arkansas kid to pair with him.
He's a pretty good mix of a blocking TE that can catch a lot of balls too.
Love to see us outbid others for the Arkansas kid to pair with him.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 10:50 am to SoloTiger
quote:
Love to see us outbid others for the Arkansas kid to pair with him.
As long as that doesn’t come at the expense of other positions that are now bigger needs.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 10:58 am to MikeTheTiger71
I think BK's ideal plan is to pair Sharp with either Hasz or Max Klare out of the portal.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 11:10 am to GMoney2600
Don’t care about stars. Care more about production and production at the P4 level. He’s a tiger now and can block. Good take by Kelly.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 11:16 am to GMoney2600
As my userid says, I'm not obsessed with stars, etc. Having said that since I can't really judge his ability for myself (lack of information here), I would prefer a transfer who supposedly has raised his subjective rating from a HS prospect to a transfer prospect. You didn't mention this but he was unrated on 247 composite out of HS and now is 87 as you mentioned. In fairness, I will point out that Jackson the CB transfer went the opposite direction...high 4* out of HS, low 4* now.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 11:19 am to 225Tyga
We got him. So he’s terrible.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 12:33 pm to 225Tyga
quote:
Does this mean he’s good or not good?
For a lot on this board, if he had transferred somewhere else, he would have been the best TE ever to play, but since he transferred to LSU, he's terrible. I don't think he has some transcendent talent, but he seemed pretty good based on the little time I saw him play.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 1:41 pm to HTX_LSU
quote:
Well we need a blocking TE
we need TEs.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 1:48 pm to GMoney2600
That's not a very big discrepancy at all. One is the lowest 4*, and the other is a high 3*.
This post was edited on 12/14/24 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 12/14/24 at 2:14 pm to GMoney2600
Because ratings and ranking are a non educated guess that fans live and die by.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 2:27 pm to NotaStarGazer
quote:
I would prefer a transfer who supposedly has raised his subjective rating from a HS prospect to a transfer prospect
This is some of the dumbest logic I’ve ever seen on this board. That’s not how this works at all
Posted on 12/14/24 at 2:31 pm to HTX_LSU
Nuss will make him a 3rd round pick next year
Posted on 12/14/24 at 2:46 pm to GMoney2600
coming to LSU seems to be an auto downgrade with those folks.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 2:50 pm to 225Tyga
He will be a solid TE, I watched him in the last game of the year and he seemed pretty good. He may struggle in blocking but none of LSU’s TE’s were killers in blocking either. Maybe they target the Klare kid now that Ole Miss poached Hasz away.
Popular
Back to top
