Started By
Message

re: 2026 Louisiana RB Jamarcea Plater

Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:29 pm to
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
287760 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:29 pm to
I burnt tape. I think he is a solid low-mid tier P5 RB. I think he is smaller than listed ht/wt. But gets N/S quick and understands running out of the shotgun well.
Posted by TL
Perry, Louisiana
Member since Jul 2011
377 posts
Posted on 7/18/25 at 7:19 am to
He will need to get stronger and he will @ the next level, but over 2200 yards in Louisiana HS ball forces you to at least take a hard look.
Posted by idoubleu
Member since Jul 2014
292 posts
Posted on 7/20/25 at 9:38 pm to
We just watched Gibbs run wild at Bama, go in the top half of the first round, weighing 195 to 200 lbs, score 20 + TD’s last year while splitting carries in Detroit ??, in the NFL and some still think you need to be 225 to be an SEC back.

This weight logic at RB doesn’t make one bit of since. Anything near 200 is big enough.

JT Lindsey and Harlem Berry are both true freshman currently listed at 184 and 185 on the official roster.

Berry deserves his praise and high ranking, as he legit reminds me of Reggie Bush.

On the other hand, I’d take Plater over JT anyday. In my opinion, their tapes are not eclose as far as vision, agility, decisiveness and explosiveness.

And trust, as a Tiger fan, I want the best for all of our players. But if JT is a back deemed good enough to wear the LSU uniform, no way Plater is less of a talent.

JT Lindsey ( Senior Hudl Midseason Highlights)

Jamarcea Plater Junior Highlights

Again, this is no knock on JT, I wish him all the best as a Tiger. This is just for comparison sakes for those posting saying Plater is not LSU material.

If plater was at RB as a sophomore, instead of safety, he’d have way more offers. Dude is a special back.

Regardless, in the portal era, even when missing on any in state prospect, there’s always the chance to get them in the portal if they ball out on another campus.

Posted by Donkus
Shreveport
Member since Feb 2013
1437 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 9:27 am to
quote:

but over 2200 yards as a first time starter in 5A Louisiana HS ball forces you to at least take a hard look.


Added a little more to your post.
Posted by BayouCowboy
Member since Dec 2012
16362 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 11:52 am to
He looks closer to 5'7 than 5'9, but who cares? If he can play, he can play. What seems the most impressive is that for a smaller back he runs between the tackles instead of trying to bounce outside. He hits holes quickly, shows vision and cuts with little wasted effort or loss of acceleration. Those small backs can hide behind OL and make it hard for defenders to square up resulting in bad angles and broken tackles. Certainly an interesting prospect.

This is my expert, novice opinion.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 12:04 pm
Posted by DeBerryJacket
DeBerry
Member since Dec 2014
393 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

He looks closer to 5'7 than 5'9


My daughter goes to Shreve. When I have seen him in person, I would agree. He definitely looks closer to 5’7” in person. But the kid can play and he is tough and solid
Posted by Magazine St
New Orleans Metro Area
Member since Feb 2015
1789 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

Jahmyr Gibbs was listed at 5'9 190 in high school ans this board loved him (including me).

5’ 11
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
287760 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

, their tapes are not eclose as far as vision, agility, decisiveness and explosiveness.



this is cap
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla
North Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
3019 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 9:27 pm to
Who was the rb for Shreve he replaced that moved to Arizona or some where out west last year? I thought that kid was really underrated.
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
28807 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 1:30 am to
quote:

5’ 11
Was going by 247's listing. He was listed 5'11 on Rivals and 5'10 on ESPN. He was also listed at 5'9 on 0n3.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
287760 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 8:18 am to
We have to stop comparing every small back to jamyr gibbs and Reggie bush
Posted by Jeff Goldblum
Gardner, LA
Member since Nov 2004
1087 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:51 am to
My son was too small for football at 5'7" as a junior in HS. A year after graduation, he was 6'2".

If this kid does get to be 5'10" or 6'0", he'll be on everyone's wish list. Better not sleep on this.
Posted by OU812
Michigan
Member since Apr 2004
13499 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Three of the best running backs of all time (Barry Sanders, Emmitt Smith, Walter Payton) were all in the 5’8”-5’10” range and weighed less than 200 lbs in high school.


Tony Dorsett was only 5' 11" 185 and he played 13 seasons retiring 2nd all-time in rushing behind Payton, after rushing for over 6,000 yards in college at Pitt.
This post was edited on 7/22/25 at 4:13 pm
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
28807 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

We have to stop comparing every small back to jamyr gibbs and Reggie bush
1. Never knew that was a thing.

2. Who compares to Reggie Bush other than Harlem Berry? Aint no way you've heard that comparison much outside of Harlem.

3. I gave multiple people. The whole point was acting like smaller RBs can't be productive.

Doug Martin listed 5'10 188 as recruit. Was listed 5'9 223 at combine


Dylan Sampson was listed 5'9 180 by 247, 5'10 180 by ESPN, and 5'10 175 by Rivals/on3. Was listed 5'8 200lb for combine.

Trevor Etienne was listed at 5'9 and between 200 and 207 by all recruiting services. Went to combine 5'9 198

Jarquez Hunter was listed at 5'10 190 on all services, checked in at 5"9 209 for the draft.

Bucky Irving was listed at 5'10 175 by the recruiting services that had profiles for him. He entered the combine at 5'9 192.

I could keep going on and on, because some of yall are too got damn bull headed to admit the truth.
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
28807 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

My son was too small for football at 5'7" as a junior in HS. A year after graduation, he was 6'2".

If this kid does get to be 5'10" or 6'0", he'll be on everyone's wish list. Better not sleep on this.
These people are so stuck in their ways, they will never understand. BTW, if you're good enough, the NFL will find you. A bunch of 5'9 and below RBs just got recently drafted.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
287760 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

because some of yall are too got damn bull headed to admit the truth.


Huh

I have nothing against “small” RBs
Posted by nitwit
Member since Oct 2007
13039 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 7:00 am to
I remember a RBs named Dalton Hilliard who was barely 5’ 8”.
Posted by SoloTiger
Member since Aug 2016
10615 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 8:47 am to
Watching a few minutes of Plater’s highlights he’s a bit of a straight line runner. Wilson may not like that aspect.

Richard Murphy was that kind of runner. They don’t tend to have great success in the SEC.
Posted by Magazine St
New Orleans Metro Area
Member since Feb 2015
1789 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

I think he is a solid low-mid tier P5 RB. I think he is smaller than listed ht/wt.

This reminds of the BS spewed about Travis Etteine back in 2016-17.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
287760 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

This reminds of the BS spewed about Travis Etteine back in 2016-17.



This guy is not Travis Etiene.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram