Started By
Message

re: Since our search feature sucked so bad...

Posted on 11/4/11 at 2:51 pm to
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
22030 posts
Posted on 11/4/11 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Google's search isn't perfect, but it is better than the alternative.


This statement is 1000000% false. I just started a thread on the rant, then searched for it using key words in title, and the thread didn't even come up. The old way would've had it at the top of the list.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
27950 posts
Posted on 11/4/11 at 2:54 pm to
Wait, you just started the thread? Why not just click the "My Posts" link at the top of the page?
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29134 posts
Posted on 11/4/11 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

quote:

Google's search isn't perfect, but it is better than the alternative.



This statement is 1000000% false. I just started a thread on the rant, then searched for it using key words in title, and the thread didn't even come up. The old way would've had it at the top of the list.
It is better than the alternative as far as strain on the server. Also, Google will have your thread indexed soon enough. Thirdly, why won't people listen when I say to use Google's main search page? You can sort chronologically there.

ETA: lol this thread got the anchor
This post was edited on 11/4/11 at 2:56 pm
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
22030 posts
Posted on 11/4/11 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Wait, you just started the thread? Why not just click the "My Posts" link at the top of the page?


I searched for the topic that I was going to start my thread about, and I got nothing; so I started the thread, everyone called it germans, I then searched for the thread using the new search feature to see how well it worked, and it didn't come up.
Posted by Uncle Stu
#AlbinoLivesMatter
Member since Aug 2004
33883 posts
Posted on 11/4/11 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

pretty soon chicken will just dump all avatars, sig pics, babe threads, and the gaming board

you have something there, lets dump about 80% of the posters as well while you're at it

The Great Purge of 2011 - blood will run in the streets
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
22030 posts
Posted on 11/4/11 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

It is better than the alternative as far as strain on the server.


Ok, that's fine and dandy if that's the reason for the switch. If this is going to be the search function on this website, using "germans" needs to become a banable offense.

quote:

Thirdly, why won't people listen when I say to use Google's main search page? You can sort chronologically there.


You want me to leave this website to go search for something on this website?
Posted by Rox
Member since Oct 2010
33333 posts
Posted on 11/4/11 at 3:10 pm to
This thread is anchored.

Chicken, I like the plan that would allow the old search to be performed up to two weeks. I never used google search before now, but I understand the strain on the servers. (I still prefer the old search, but it is what it is)
This post was edited on 11/4/11 at 3:23 pm
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29134 posts
Posted on 11/4/11 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

You want me to leave this website to go search for something on this website?
I just suggested that you use the best tool for the job. Also, you never have to "leave this website" to visit another site, so I would also suggest getting familiar with using browser tabs if you aren't already. Not being a smartass, that's a dead-serious suggestion.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
27950 posts
Posted on 11/4/11 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

I searched for the topic that I was going to start my thread about, and I got nothing; so I started the thread, everyone called it germans, I then searched for the thread using the new search feature to see how well it worked, and it didn't come up.
just curious, but how did you plan to search for the thread using the old way...just using "sign"?
Posted by Coon
La 56 Southbound
Member since Feb 2005
18579 posts
Posted on 11/4/11 at 4:39 pm to
just checking in... looks like more love pouring in for the new search because the old one sucked so bad.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29134 posts
Posted on 11/4/11 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

looks like more love pouring in for the new search because the old one sucked so bad.
God damn, what part about it was a strain on the server do you not understand? A single search could conceivably use the server resources of 20 or more regular page refreshes. Are you really going to keep bitching about a single feature that you don't like on a free website that will surely be improved with time?
Posted by Coon
La 56 Southbound
Member since Feb 2005
18579 posts
Posted on 11/4/11 at 5:38 pm to
nope, just busy debunking the myth that people were bitching about the old search and calling for this...
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
22030 posts
Posted on 11/4/11 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

but how did you plan to search for the thread using the old way...just using "sign"?


I would've searched for sign, bama sign, sign I-10 before I would've made the thread using the old way.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135272 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:36 am to
ok chicken, legit gripe on new "search feature. i supposed to search specific boards? I searched "O-T lounge" "oaths" and "vows" and it still hasn't puled up the topic located within those parameters. look, I'll pay the premium for the old search feature. shoot me an email.
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
69753 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 3:33 pm to
eta: nevermind
This post was edited on 11/6/11 at 3:35 pm
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram