Started By
Message

re: Why did influencers such as O’Hearn and Liver King lie about their ped use

Posted on 9/9/24 at 9:43 am to
Posted by GeauxTigers123
Member since Feb 2007
3700 posts
Posted on 9/9/24 at 9:43 am to
quote:

People are super deluded about what's actually natty these days


I look at people in the gym and online and wonder what is possible without taking roids. Like I really and not sure.

Obviously it’s unlikely to look like the liver king, but not sure how ripped is possible.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38079 posts
Posted on 9/9/24 at 10:10 am to
go look at greg from kinobody, he has taken a bunch of test to prove he is natty.

he is about 170ish ripped

but ffmi usually tells the story
Posted by DrDenim
By the airport
Member since Sep 2022
970 posts
Posted on 9/9/24 at 11:23 am to
There was a new poster on the Greyskull forums who was making his first post in his training log and it's customary to share a brief bit of background/bio information to give other members an idea of where that person is coming from contextually. It makes everything easier down the line when questions get asked and opinions need to be shared. Anyway, this person briefly mentioned that when they were a new lifter they held the opinion that anyone who could bench press over 200lbs "must be on steroids", and then he acknowledged how ridiculous that sounded once he gained more experience and learned more about strength, strength training, and people who lift weights.

It's hard to know what another person's level of knowledge is and how they see the world and it's people. When you're on the inside of something(like lifting weights) it can be mind-breaking to talk to someone who is completely on the outside of that little world, their perception of it is undoubtedly shaped by ignorance and is always entertaining to me when I get to talk to someone like that.

Keeping that phenomenon in mind, it's easy for me to understand how and why a person would not reveal that they use steroids or have used them in the past. That's on top of the most obvious answer, which LSU777 already spoke to, it's almost 100% guaranteed that the people we're talking about were not allowed to acknowledge their steroid usage due to sponsorship contracts that explicitly prevented them from doing so, for further knowledge go watch the Bigger, Stronger, Faster* documentary film, Chris Bell gets into these questions.
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
40361 posts
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

I'm guessing if they could convince people they were natural, that would mean more views and more sales of whatever products they were shilling.



this is like 90% of it, the other 10% is they don't like to advertise to committing felonies
This post was edited on 9/9/24 at 12:27 pm
Posted by caro81
Member since Jul 2017
6358 posts
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

Why do you care?


my only real problem with it is that it sets an unrealistic standard. It wasnt so bad in Arnolds day but with the advent of social media and young minds being constantly exposed to these influencers i can see how they begin to develop issues revolving around this. Could manifest in some pretty bad ways. Been happening with "beauty" standards in young women for a long time now.

We should just destigmatize steroid use by now, as long as the dangers of their use/abuse are always being presented. We shouldn't applaud their use, but being open about using them. But youre right, no companies want to be associated with and sponsor anyone who would admit to using.
Posted by DrDenim
By the airport
Member since Sep 2022
970 posts
Posted on 9/9/24 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

We should just destigmatize steroid use by now, as long as the dangers of their use/abuse are always being presented. We shouldn't applaud their use, but being open about using them. But youre right, no companies want to be associated with and sponsor anyone who would admit to using.


Depending on who you listen to, or watch, or read, this has already happened. There isn't broad acceptance of it on a wide enough spectrum to matter to the general population, but there are people who have accomplished this.

As to the unrealistic standards, I'll say this, while the technology has made our lives even more saturated with what I choose to call "marketing", humanity has developed along with that technology and while it's different person to person, humans are more sophisticated with concerns to pushing back against this "marketing". What I'm trying to say is that people are better bullshite detectors. Doesn't mean everybody is perfect, or even really good, at detecting whatever bullshite they've encountered at any given time, but if you compared 12 year old me from 1990-91 to a 12 year old today, I bet the current 12 year old could run circles around me in regards to sniffing out bullshite.

But the marketing methods haven't changed much over history, just the tech, most marketing is all about sowing seeds that grow into doubt, insecurity, and hopelessness. The cure for all those negative feelings is buying "The Product", always. Once a person realizes that is one of, if not THE main method of marketing, and they accept that they live in a world that is always marketing to them(the "Store" never closes, it's open every second of every day, all over the globe), they can at least know to be prepared to deal with this non-stop onslaught of bullshite. So the "unrealistic standards" that bother you, they aren't going anywhere, they will only proliferate and become more sophisticated. You just have to stay a fraction of a micrometer ahead of these marketing schemes.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38079 posts
Posted on 9/9/24 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

my only real problem with it is that it sets an unrealistic standard. It wasnt so bad in Arnolds day but with the advent of social media and young minds being constantly exposed to these influencers i can see how they begin to develop issues revolving around this. Could manifest in some pretty bad ways. Been happening with "beauty" standards in young women for a long time now.


i mean.....i know im gonna come off as an a-hole here

but frick those kids need to get the frick over it and stop being so naive

quote:

We should just destigmatize steroid use by now, as long as the dangers of their use/abuse are always being presented. We shouldn't applaud their use, but being open about using them. But youre right, no companies want to be associated with and sponsor anyone who would admit to using.


agreed
Posted by caro81
Member since Jul 2017
6358 posts
Posted on 9/9/24 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

i mean.....i know im gonna come off as an a-hole here

but frick those kids need to get the frick over it and stop being so naive



fair enough, and as someone who doesn't have kids and doesn't even particularly like them, i am not inclined to argue
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38079 posts
Posted on 9/9/24 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

fair enough, and as someone who doesn't have kids and doesn't even particularly like them, i am not inclined to argue


i have 3 boys, im just going to be honest with them as they get older.
Posted by JohnnyQuidds
Member since Aug 2024
270 posts
Posted on 9/9/24 at 8:35 pm to
Rich Piana did; then he died
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38079 posts
Posted on 9/9/24 at 8:56 pm to
To be fair, rich snorted bugga sugga pretty much every day
Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
70012 posts
Posted on 9/9/24 at 9:48 pm to
He abused other shite as well
Posted by JohnnyQuidds
Member since Aug 2024
270 posts
Posted on 9/9/24 at 10:54 pm to
Yeah I understand; all I said was he didn’t lie about using anything and still had large following.

I didn’t say anything about heart and liver being 2x normal adult male;

Also, OP topic says PED right? Not cocaine, heroin, synthol, etc
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38079 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 8:19 am to
i get that but Rich also really didnt have sponsor other than his 5% company that he owned big portion of. it literally does not help these guys 1 bit and can only hurt them to admit....so why would they do that?
Posted by Loup
Ferriday
Member since Apr 2019
17000 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 8:58 am to
When I was younger I didn't admit to my GF, coworkers, etc that I was using PEDs. I wasn't making money off of fitness, though. Now? Frick it, I tell everybody I'm on TRT. I'd probably be the same way if I were using other stuff. IDK why I was so ashamed of it when I was younger, I guess because I knew it was a stupid decision to get on them to begin with.
Posted by Homey the Clown
Member since Feb 2009
6082 posts
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Rich Piana did; then he died


fricking legend...
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111523 posts
Posted on 9/11/24 at 11:42 am to
I think the main issue is how foolish it could make you look

If you have a family and kids and you die because you took steroids to make your muscles look bigger you look like a fricking dumbass

Same with alcoholics etc. For some it may be money, but for the majority it’s a shame they feel internal about what they are doing
This post was edited on 9/11/24 at 11:43 am
Posted by Homey the Clown
Member since Feb 2009
6082 posts
Posted on 9/11/24 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

you die because you abused steroids
FIFY

quote:

Same with alcoholics
Correct, alcoholics abuse alcohol.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram