- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Scottie Arraignment
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:00 am to lsupride87
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:00 am to lsupride87
That’s how I thought it worked that way also but I just looked it up and in Ky the defendant is the only person who must be at an arraignment in the state of Kentucky. It looks like it did definitely get backed up to June 3rd. Which would be the Monday after the RBC.
This post was edited on 5/21/24 at 8:03 am
0
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:19 am to lsupride87
What was the point of mentioning Scotties private jet.
We all know what that's about.
Look they are going to drop the charges. But they are going to ask him to plead to a lesser charge. I say Bull shite don't plead to anything. I had some shite go down 15 years ago and they asked me to plead to a misdemeanor resisting. I should not have done that. They had nothing. But this is how they get you. Everytime I go purchase a gun now I have to wait a week to get it.
We all know what that's about.
Look they are going to drop the charges. But they are going to ask him to plead to a lesser charge. I say Bull shite don't plead to anything. I had some shite go down 15 years ago and they asked me to plead to a misdemeanor resisting. I should not have done that. They had nothing. But this is how they get you. Everytime I go purchase a gun now I have to wait a week to get it.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:20 am to cptigger
quote:
I loved the part about the number 1 golfer in the world not being widely known.
I mean this seems absurd to people posting on a golf message board, but if I told a non-golf fan that “Scottie Scheffler got arrested Friday morning” they probably wouldn’t know who I was talking about.
That’s also true about almost every golfer outside of Tiger Woods & about 4 others.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:28 am to JimTiger72
quote:
I mean this seems absurd to people posting on a golf message board, but if I told a non-golf fan that “Scottie Scheffler got arrested Friday morning” they probably wouldn’t know who I was talking about.
You could probably say the same thing about half the justices on the Supreme Court, unfortunately. That doesn’t mean they aren’t still “widely known,” especially compared to 99.9999% of other people who appear before that judge.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:43 am to JimTiger72
maybe, but you are a cop working a fatality scene at the entrance gate at a Major golf tournament. Even he can't be oblivious to the fact that golfers are trying to show up. Even if he had no clue who Scottie is (which I don't believe) all it would have taken is two seconds to ask. Instead he "attaches himself" to the his car, whatever the hell that means and then proceeds to book him with a felony. He might not have known who Scottie was but he damn sure knew he wasn't some rando trying to run him over.
Cop fricked up, perhaps Scottie wasn't perfect, cop realizes it at some point, and then makes the conscience decision to double down and book with a felony.
Cop fricked up, perhaps Scottie wasn't perfect, cop realizes it at some point, and then makes the conscience decision to double down and book with a felony.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:51 am to cptigger
I mean he was hit by Scottie’s vehicle. Not really sure what you wanted to cop to do? 
This post was edited on 5/21/24 at 8:52 am
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:57 am to BigApple
again, maybe. But they would've used language such as the defendant struck the officer with his car. instead they used the detective attached himself to the car. No one has explained exactly what that means.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:57 am to BigApple
quote:Not remotely true. Not even the cop claims this happened
I mean he was hit by Scottie’s vehicle
Why lie?
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:58 am to cptigger
quote:No, not maybe. The officer doesn’t even claim he was hit by Schefflers vehicle
again, maybe
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:24 am to lsupride87
Call it what you want. From the police report:
quote:
"Detective Gillis was in the middle of the westbound lanes, in full LMPD uniform and a hi-visibility yellow reflective rain jacket. Detective Gillis stopped subject and attempted to give instructions. Subject refused to comply and accelerated forward, dragging Detective Gillis to the ground. Detective Gillis suffered pain, swelling, and abrasions to his left wrist and knee. He was transported to the hospital for further medical treatment by emergency medical personnel.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:28 am to BigApple
quote:
I mean he was hit by Scottie’s vehicle. Not really sure what you wanted to cop to do
No, the cop apparently went out of his way to jump on to the car. And he turned his body camera off before he did it.
There is no evidence supporting the police report. Jeff Darlington at ESPN told a far different story. The behavior of the other police during his arrest suggests the report is false. If someone just ran over a cop with his car and sent him to the hospital, the cops are not gonna be all buddy buddy with the suspect at the jailhouse.
This post was edited on 5/21/24 at 9:38 am
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:28 am to BigApple
quote:
Call it what you want. From the police report:
back the blue, especially in Louisville.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:29 am to BigApple
No where in there does it say he was struck. It sounds like he grabbed the car and was too stupid to let go.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:29 am to BigApple
quote:
BigApple
You left out the part about his irreparable $80 pair of pants.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:31 am to TDTOM
So, when a cop jumps on your car to stop you, it’s perfectly fine to keep going and drag the cop along for the ride.
Got it !!!!
Got it !!!!
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:32 am to BigApple
Where does it say the cop jumped on the car?
The cops own words don’t say that, zero witnesses say that
You have now lied twice. Why?
The cops own words don’t say that, zero witnesses say that
You have now lied twice. Why?
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:34 am to BigApple
quote:
So, when a cop jumps on your car to stop you, it’s perfectly fine to keep going and drag the cop along for the ride.
If someone jumps on the hood of my car I probably think they are some insane person trying to attack me because not one single law enforcement department in this country (world?) instructs its officers to jump on the hood of a moving vehicle in any circumstances.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:36 am to cptigger
quote:
No one has explained exactly what that means.
According to the eye witness reporter, the cop tried to stop the car and when Scottie continued, he grabbed the door handle and tried to open it. When the car stopped, after traveling about thirty yards, the cop started banging on the window with his flashlight. If I'm not mistaken, there were two law enforcement people involved, one on one side of the bus Scottie was trying to go around and then the guy who tried to keep him from entering the grounds. The first gave him the go ahead to go around and the second one acted like an idiot.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:36 am to JohnnyKilroy
The officer didn’t jump on the car. He shuffled on the side of the car grabbing at the handle
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News