Started By
Message

Patrick Reed at it again.

Posted on 1/30/21 at 2:52 pm
Posted by emoney
Westerville, OH
Member since May 2010
8750 posts
Posted on 1/30/21 at 2:52 pm
Reed moved a bounced ball, then brought an official over to confirm it was embedded AFTER he moved it. And got the okay from the rules’ official.
Posted by Big L
Houston
Member since Sep 2005
6065 posts
Posted on 1/30/21 at 2:54 pm to
I don’t see the issue. He brought in a rules official. They said that if the official disagree he coukd replace it with no penalty.
Posted by CWilken21
Gnawlins
Member since Mar 2005
4143 posts
Posted on 1/30/21 at 3:16 pm to
The rules official couldn’t say it was or it wasn't embedded because Patrick had already decided it was and picked it up.
Posted by Bluefin
The Banana Stand
Member since Apr 2011
13459 posts
Posted on 1/30/21 at 3:26 pm to
Gotta give Faldo credit for continuously calling bullshite on that ruling for the past 30 minutes.

Never seen a ball plug on a second bounce. Short of playing in quicksand, I don’t know how that’s possible. Reed is such a POS.
This post was edited on 1/30/21 at 3:28 pm
Posted by Chipand2Putts
trembling hills
Member since Apr 2012
1767 posts
Posted on 1/30/21 at 3:26 pm to
The official said he could feel the lip where it was embedded, so he agreed to the free drop. I think any other player would have let the official check the ball first. Fatrick probably mashed the ball in before he picked it up.
The ball may very well have been embedded, but I think cheating comes so naturally to him, it never even occurred to him to leave the ball for the official. Also, with his label as a cheater, you would think he’d be a little more aware of situations like this where he could be accused of cheating, but he’s obviously not.
Nobilo is not impressed.
Posted by Swagga
504
Member since Dec 2009
18935 posts
Posted on 1/30/21 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

The rules official couldn’t say it was or it wasn't embedded because Patrick had already decided it was and picked it up.



This is the biggest thing for me. The fact that he did that should have cost him the free drop. You should have to prove a ball is embedded.
Posted by Big L
Houston
Member since Sep 2005
6065 posts
Posted on 1/30/21 at 5:13 pm to
Well if they don’t want you to pick it up to check it then make it a penalty to do so. Seems like a smart move by him because he didn’t risk anything. not defending his history but I don’t see an issue here. These guys take full advantage of the rules all the time...sprinkler heads being maybe kinda close to their stance so they get relief and use it as an opportunity to improve the lie...or the power cables, tv towers, giant loose impediments that require 15 guys to move, etc.
Posted by Sherman Klump
Wellman College
Member since Jul 2011
4568 posts
Posted on 1/30/21 at 5:17 pm to
There’s a distinct difference in using the rules to your advantage and what he did.
Posted by Cossatotjoe
Member since Oct 2020
938 posts
Posted on 1/30/21 at 6:13 pm to
And let’s not forget, he lied. How can I say that? There is no way possible for that ball to have been embedded. He knew that without having to call an official over. Golf doesn’t work if you have to rely on officials to police player honesty.
This post was edited on 1/30/21 at 6:40 pm
Posted by BuyloSellhi
The South
Member since May 2017
691 posts
Posted on 1/30/21 at 7:29 pm to
He asked the marshals and volunteers that were there what happened. They told him they “never saw the ball bounce”. If a ball doesn’t bounce from a tee shot, it is likely imbedded. He couldn’t see that from the tee, so he asked. Then he marked it and picked it up. ALL within the rules. The official came over, agreed with the path forward, and Reed did as instructed.

If it was any other player, this would not even be discussed.

May not be what others might have done, but it is the rules.

Posted by emoney
Westerville, OH
Member since May 2010
8750 posts
Posted on 1/30/21 at 7:58 pm to
If it were any other player they would have called the rules’ official over before they moved the ball and asked the same question.
Posted by Mouth
Member since Jan 2008
23055 posts
Posted on 1/30/21 at 8:05 pm to
The ball bounced. It wasn’t embedded. PR cheated. Water is wet. The sky is blue.
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
39604 posts
Posted on 1/30/21 at 8:39 pm to
Cheatrick strikes again. PGA is afraid of Reed
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
33212 posts
Posted on 1/30/21 at 8:39 pm to
Faldo hit him with the “the golf gods are watching” when he had the fried egg later on

Reed is such a fat shitbag
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
87296 posts
Posted on 1/30/21 at 8:45 pm to
And he was caught with a burner Twitter account too. Or his wife.
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
33212 posts
Posted on 1/30/21 at 8:54 pm to
And of course his batshit crazy wife tweets in all caps
Posted by Bustedsack
Member since Dec 2017
4387 posts
Posted on 1/30/21 at 9:32 pm to
you do understand it wasn't a tee shot, right? fat boy should've never picked it up, he cheated. hopefully tomorrow he gets all the bad breaks.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
72085 posts
Posted on 1/30/21 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

He asked the marshals and volunteers that were there what happened. They told him they “never saw the ball bounce”. If a ball doesn’t bounce from a tee shot, it is likely imbedded. He couldn’t see that from the tee, so he asked. Then he marked it and picked it up. ALL within the rules. The official came over, agreed with the path forward, and Reed did as instructed.

If it was any other player, this would not even be discussed.

May not be what others might have done, but it is the rules.



If there was a lip where his ball initially was, then he pushed it down to create one. It is the only logical explanation.

And I could not disagree more about if this were someone else, we would not discuss it. We are talking about golf here, where fricking fans call in perceived cheating they see on tv.

But to that point, since you made it...he obviously has a rep, and it’s for a reason. Once someone shows you who they are the first time, believe them.

There is 0 fricking chance that ball was embedded.
Posted by Cossatotjoe
Member since Oct 2020
938 posts
Posted on 1/31/21 at 12:31 am to
quote:

He asked the marshals and volunteers that were there what happened. They told him they “never saw the ball bounce”. If a ball doesn’t bounce from a tee shot, it is likely imbedded. He couldn’t see that from the tee, so he asked. Then he marked it and picked it up. ALL within the rules. The official came over, agreed with the path forward, and Reed did as instructed.

If it was any other player, this would not even be discussed.

May not be what others might have done, but it is the rules.


bullshite. It doesn’t matter what he saw or what someone else thought they saw. There was no possible way that ball was embedded. So it really doesn’t matter. All that bullshite about bouncing or not bouncing only matters if it was possibly embedded. It wasn’t. That ball bounced and landed soft. It wasn’t embedded.

Put it this way. If you were playing a regular round and there were no volunteers and no Marshall’s to ask what they saw, you would walk up and look at it. All of you information comes from what you can see when you look at it. The fact that someone told you that they didn’t see it bounce does not give you a reasonable belief that it might be embedded.
This post was edited on 1/31/21 at 12:34 am
Posted by BallChamp00
Member since May 2015
7444 posts
Posted on 1/31/21 at 6:08 am to
Everyone knew golf facts was Justine. Just like 99/100 times it’s Justine on Pats account.

As for as the ruling-
He walked up and asked the volunteer if it bounced. Once she said no he immediately told his playing partners he was checking. He picked up ball identified it and checked ground. The rules official determined it was embedded so the entire Brandel Chamblee act on the palming-cleaning ball rule is null and void. Even if it was not embedded it would be hard to access that rule as you can’t see the ball moving in his palm.

Add to it the fact the rules officials said he has seen a bounced ball plug this week and you have 0 violations and no issues.

You can hate on him all you want and you can disagree with how he went about it but everything he did was legal.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram