- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Patrick Reed at it again.
Posted on 1/30/21 at 2:52 pm
Posted on 1/30/21 at 2:52 pm
Reed moved a bounced ball, then brought an official over to confirm it was embedded AFTER he moved it. And got the okay from the rules’ official.
Posted on 1/30/21 at 2:54 pm to emoney
I don’t see the issue. He brought in a rules official. They said that if the official disagree he coukd replace it with no penalty.
Posted on 1/30/21 at 3:16 pm to Big L
The rules official couldn’t say it was or it wasn't embedded because Patrick had already decided it was and picked it up.
Posted on 1/30/21 at 3:26 pm to emoney
Gotta give Faldo credit for continuously calling bullshite on that ruling for the past 30 minutes.
Never seen a ball plug on a second bounce. Short of playing in quicksand, I don’t know how that’s possible. Reed is such a POS.
Never seen a ball plug on a second bounce. Short of playing in quicksand, I don’t know how that’s possible. Reed is such a POS.
This post was edited on 1/30/21 at 3:28 pm
Posted on 1/30/21 at 3:26 pm to CWilken21
The official said he could feel the lip where it was embedded, so he agreed to the free drop. I think any other player would have let the official check the ball first. Fatrick probably mashed the ball in before he picked it up.
The ball may very well have been embedded, but I think cheating comes so naturally to him, it never even occurred to him to leave the ball for the official. Also, with his label as a cheater, you would think he’d be a little more aware of situations like this where he could be accused of cheating, but he’s obviously not.
Nobilo is not impressed.
The ball may very well have been embedded, but I think cheating comes so naturally to him, it never even occurred to him to leave the ball for the official. Also, with his label as a cheater, you would think he’d be a little more aware of situations like this where he could be accused of cheating, but he’s obviously not.
Nobilo is not impressed.
Posted on 1/30/21 at 4:57 pm to CWilken21
quote:
The rules official couldn’t say it was or it wasn't embedded because Patrick had already decided it was and picked it up.
This is the biggest thing for me. The fact that he did that should have cost him the free drop. You should have to prove a ball is embedded.
Posted on 1/30/21 at 5:13 pm to Swagga
Well if they don’t want you to pick it up to check it then make it a penalty to do so. Seems like a smart move by him because he didn’t risk anything. not defending his history but I don’t see an issue here. These guys take full advantage of the rules all the time...sprinkler heads being maybe kinda close to their stance so they get relief and use it as an opportunity to improve the lie...or the power cables, tv towers, giant loose impediments that require 15 guys to move, etc.
Posted on 1/30/21 at 5:17 pm to Big L
There’s a distinct difference in using the rules to your advantage and what he did.
Posted on 1/30/21 at 6:13 pm to emoney
And let’s not forget, he lied. How can I say that? There is no way possible for that ball to have been embedded. He knew that without having to call an official over. Golf doesn’t work if you have to rely on officials to police player honesty.
This post was edited on 1/30/21 at 6:40 pm
Posted on 1/30/21 at 7:29 pm to Cossatotjoe
He asked the marshals and volunteers that were there what happened. They told him they “never saw the ball bounce”. If a ball doesn’t bounce from a tee shot, it is likely imbedded. He couldn’t see that from the tee, so he asked. Then he marked it and picked it up. ALL within the rules. The official came over, agreed with the path forward, and Reed did as instructed.
If it was any other player, this would not even be discussed.
May not be what others might have done, but it is the rules.
If it was any other player, this would not even be discussed.
May not be what others might have done, but it is the rules.
Posted on 1/30/21 at 7:58 pm to BuyloSellhi
If it were any other player they would have called the rules’ official over before they moved the ball and asked the same question.
Posted on 1/30/21 at 8:05 pm to emoney
The ball bounced. It wasn’t embedded. PR cheated. Water is wet. The sky is blue.
Posted on 1/30/21 at 8:39 pm to emoney
Cheatrick strikes again. PGA is afraid of Reed
Posted on 1/30/21 at 8:39 pm to Mouth
Faldo hit him with the “the golf gods are watching” when he had the fried egg later on
Reed is such a fat shitbag
Reed is such a fat shitbag
Posted on 1/30/21 at 8:45 pm to jamboybarry
And he was caught with a burner Twitter account too. Or his wife. 
Posted on 1/30/21 at 8:54 pm to ell_13
And of course his batshit crazy wife tweets in all caps
Posted on 1/30/21 at 9:32 pm to BuyloSellhi
you do understand it wasn't a tee shot, right? fat boy should've never picked it up, he cheated. hopefully tomorrow he gets all the bad breaks.
Posted on 1/30/21 at 11:17 pm to BuyloSellhi
quote:
He asked the marshals and volunteers that were there what happened. They told him they “never saw the ball bounce”. If a ball doesn’t bounce from a tee shot, it is likely imbedded. He couldn’t see that from the tee, so he asked. Then he marked it and picked it up. ALL within the rules. The official came over, agreed with the path forward, and Reed did as instructed.
If it was any other player, this would not even be discussed.
May not be what others might have done, but it is the rules.
If there was a lip where his ball initially was, then he pushed it down to create one. It is the only logical explanation.
And I could not disagree more about if this were someone else, we would not discuss it. We are talking about golf here, where fricking fans call in perceived cheating they see on tv.
But to that point, since you made it...he obviously has a rep, and it’s for a reason. Once someone shows you who they are the first time, believe them.
There is 0 fricking chance that ball was embedded.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 12:31 am to BuyloSellhi
quote:
He asked the marshals and volunteers that were there what happened. They told him they “never saw the ball bounce”. If a ball doesn’t bounce from a tee shot, it is likely imbedded. He couldn’t see that from the tee, so he asked. Then he marked it and picked it up. ALL within the rules. The official came over, agreed with the path forward, and Reed did as instructed.
If it was any other player, this would not even be discussed.
May not be what others might have done, but it is the rules.
bullshite. It doesn’t matter what he saw or what someone else thought they saw. There was no possible way that ball was embedded. So it really doesn’t matter. All that bullshite about bouncing or not bouncing only matters if it was possibly embedded. It wasn’t. That ball bounced and landed soft. It wasn’t embedded.
Put it this way. If you were playing a regular round and there were no volunteers and no Marshall’s to ask what they saw, you would walk up and look at it. All of you information comes from what you can see when you look at it. The fact that someone told you that they didn’t see it bounce does not give you a reasonable belief that it might be embedded.
This post was edited on 1/31/21 at 12:34 am
Posted on 1/31/21 at 6:08 am to ell_13
Everyone knew golf facts was Justine. Just like 99/100 times it’s Justine on Pats account.
As for as the ruling-
He walked up and asked the volunteer if it bounced. Once she said no he immediately told his playing partners he was checking. He picked up ball identified it and checked ground. The rules official determined it was embedded so the entire Brandel Chamblee act on the palming-cleaning ball rule is null and void. Even if it was not embedded it would be hard to access that rule as you can’t see the ball moving in his palm.
Add to it the fact the rules officials said he has seen a bounced ball plug this week and you have 0 violations and no issues.
You can hate on him all you want and you can disagree with how he went about it but everything he did was legal.
As for as the ruling-
He walked up and asked the volunteer if it bounced. Once she said no he immediately told his playing partners he was checking. He picked up ball identified it and checked ground. The rules official determined it was embedded so the entire Brandel Chamblee act on the palming-cleaning ball rule is null and void. Even if it was not embedded it would be hard to access that rule as you can’t see the ball moving in his palm.
Add to it the fact the rules officials said he has seen a bounced ball plug this week and you have 0 violations and no issues.
You can hate on him all you want and you can disagree with how he went about it but everything he did was legal.
Popular
Back to top


9






