
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LIV MEGA Thread: Liv is Crumbling and the end is near
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:16 am to JimTiger72
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:16 am to JimTiger72
I have a nickel in my pocket. But it could easily be worth $100.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:34 am to JimTiger72
quote:
part of their $300M investment.
What it actually says
quote:
Possible 300m financing
LIV has yet to get any investment, and they had to push back their player commitment deadline. Why do you think that is Jim?
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 6:38 am
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:51 am to lsupride87
quote:
they had to push back their player commitment deadline
What player commitment? There is no longer any requisite number of players for the deal to get made. Again, take as much time as you need to process
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 6:52 am
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:10 am to JimTiger72
quote:Are you drunk?
What player commitment? There is no longer any requisite number of players for the deal to get made.
It’s in the fricking filing from Monday you moron
quote:
On the commitment front, BC had initially set Oct. 13 for a “requisite number of players” to agree to new deals with LIV, or else it could walk away from the agreement. However, that date has now been pushed back two weeks to Oct. 25.
LINK
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 7:11 am
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:14 am to lsupride87
I posted this on the last page but here you go - they changed the language from the earlier requirements. By all accounts they have already received enough commitments to move forward
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:16 am to JimTiger72
Accounts that follow as many people as follow them back are great news breaking accounts!
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:16 am to lsupride87
quote:
Based on everything that we're hearing about player discontent, this seems like quite the uphill battle for LIV.
Remember when this was the report a month ago?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:16 am to JimTiger72
quote:Except by every account you are 100% wrong
By all accounts they have already received enough commitments to move forward
It’s a fact they still have not received the necessary commitments for the investment which is why they pushed back the commitment date.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:18 am to lsupride87
quote:
It’s a fact
Here’s an article from Rex Hoggard on Golf channel
LINK
quote:
According to industry sources, LIV Golf has received verbal commitments from a significant number of players to put the league well above the requisite player support threshold to secure future funding
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 7:19 am
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:22 am to JimTiger72
Do you understand the change to the “player requisite “ is worse for LIV?
It went from 50% of those with a claim against Liv, to “ whatever number of players is necessary to ensure LIV can continue operating as a bona fide golf league. BC Partners gets to determine whether that threshold has been met. ”
That clearly has not been met because the stars have not committed, hence the extended date for player commitments
It went from 50% of those with a claim against Liv, to “ whatever number of players is necessary to ensure LIV can continue operating as a bona fide golf league. BC Partners gets to determine whether that threshold has been met. ”
That clearly has not been met because the stars have not committed, hence the extended date for player commitments
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:24 am to lsupride87
Take as much time as you need to process this information. I know it is difficult for you
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:25 am to lsupride87
quote:
lsupride87
You’ve been factually incorrect 3 times in one page. Very embarrassing. Take a break and catch your breath.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:26 am to CPA Yung Boi
Excuse me?
LIv golf has not received the player commitment to secure the financing- fact
BC partners pushed back the commitment date-fact
LIv golf has only received 4m for bankruptcy proceedings and not the 300m financing - fact
The player requisite went from 50% of players who had financial claims against LIV to undefined amount as determined solely by BC Partners. - fact
Nothing about is an opinion
LIv golf has not received the player commitment to secure the financing- fact
BC partners pushed back the commitment date-fact
LIv golf has only received 4m for bankruptcy proceedings and not the 300m financing - fact
The player requisite went from 50% of players who had financial claims against LIV to undefined amount as determined solely by BC Partners. - fact
Nothing about is an opinion
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 7:30 am
Posted on 10/7/26 at 8:33 am to lsupride87
It’s good news for LIV that BC seems committed to making something work. If they want to pour $300m into the golf league then they’ll be able to hold tournaments next year.
Pushing back commitment dates and adjusting the language are not great signs in the sense of they clearly have not secured all of the commitments they want to get and therefore how serious a league LIV 2.0 turns out to be is very much up in the air.
Pushing back commitment dates and adjusting the language are not great signs in the sense of they clearly have not secured all of the commitments they want to get and therefore how serious a league LIV 2.0 turns out to be is very much up in the air.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 9:17 am to tigerfan88
quote:
It’s good news for LIV that BC seems committed to making something work. If they want to pour $300m into the golf league then they’ll be able to hold tournaments next year.
Pushing back commitment dates and adjusting the language are not great signs in the sense of they clearly have not secured all of the commitments they want to get and therefore how serious a league LIV 2.0 turns out to be is very much up in the air.
This is my take as well. I think it's also notable that Scott O'Neil said this on Tuesday: “We’re moving from a Saudi-type business plan to a—as I like to say—a ‘business’ business plan,” O’Neil said Tuesday at the Sportico Invest conference in London.
I don't know what business model you can present to big named players if you're going to run this like a true business now. You're basically going to have to convince these players to take a risk on what amounts to a startup with not a ton of financial security in the short-term or long-term, at least not the financial security they're used to. I think Bryson may do it because he always does the opposite of conventional with everything in his life.
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 9:18 am
Posted on 10/7/26 at 11:21 am to lsufball19
Posted on 10/7/26 at 11:25 am to usc6158
Nobody is going to participate in LIV 2.0 because it ain’t happening
Posted on 10/7/26 at 11:34 am to lsupride87
quote:
Nobody is going to participate in LIV 2.0 because it ain’t happening
Quite the opinion with the given information
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 11:38 am
Posted on 10/7/26 at 11:55 am to JimTiger72
quote:
Quite the opinion with the given information
Why? the bigger names are starting to jump ship and when you have zero star power left who is going to willing invest in a product that no one was really watching to begin with?
LIV went about it completely wrong honestly.. If they wanted to start a new league filled with team events the should have approached the PGA with the plan to partner. They could have started slower and built a following with in then maybe try and separate after successful test runs with the backing of the PGA
Instead, they tried to kick in the front door of established golf throwing money at every Tom,Dick and Harry in an attempt to blaze some trail with honestly an inferior product.. In doing so the one variable was that matters the most is eyeballs on TV and butts in seats was essentially divided in two because people took sides and what LIV attempted to do rubbed people the wrong way virtually killing half the intended target base from the start.. It seriously should be a study in any high level business school on how NOT to blaze a trail on a new venture with an old established product..

Popular
Back to top


0








