- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PC Discussion - Gaming, Performance and Enthusiasts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 7:35 pm to LSU Coyote
Posted on 8/13/17 at 7:35 pm to LSU Coyote
We don't know the thermals yet for the Intels above 10 cores.
I'd guess they would run very hot.
I'd guess they would run very hot.
1
Posted on 8/13/17 at 8:30 pm to boXerrumble
So, how good is this in firestrike
quote:
3DMark Score 16026
Graphics Score 22262
Physics Score 8907
Combined Score 8427
Graphics Test 1 106.94 fps
Graphics Test 2 88.41 fps
Physics Test 28.28 fps
Combined Test 39.2 fps
Posted on 8/13/17 at 8:32 pm to geauxtigers87
That physics score is pretty rough what CPU?
This post was edited on 8/13/17 at 8:33 pm
Posted on 8/13/17 at 8:33 pm to UltimateHog
i5 7600K
Posted on 8/13/17 at 8:34 pm to geauxtigers87
You dumbass you actually did that? 
This post was edited on 8/13/17 at 8:35 pm
Posted on 8/13/17 at 10:37 pm to geauxtigers87
Graphics score
20 573
Graphics test 1
98.23 FPS
Graphics test 2
82.11 FPS
Physics score
12 996
Physics test
41.26 FPS
Combined score
7 929
Combined test
36.88 FPS
System information SHOW DETAILS
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
CPU
Intel Core i7 6700K
Your GPU is running better than my Founders Edition 1080 tho
20 573
Graphics test 1
98.23 FPS
Graphics test 2
82.11 FPS
Physics score
12 996
Physics test
41.26 FPS
Combined score
7 929
Combined test
36.88 FPS
System information SHOW DETAILS
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
CPU
Intel Core i7 6700K
Your GPU is running better than my Founders Edition 1080 tho
This post was edited on 8/13/17 at 10:38 pm
Posted on 8/13/17 at 11:22 pm to UltimateHog
Stahp
Posted on 8/13/17 at 11:41 pm to Devious
?
It's a really bad buy idk why you recommended it.
4 cores 4 threads and no hyperthreading for more money, you kind of screwed him.
Even if he is an Intel fanboy you gotta wait until you can get the 7700K at this stage of gaming.
I score 16,000 with a 7700K, double his score. Gaming has been maxing 4 threads for awhile now and add in no hyperthreading going forward it's rough to spend that much on it.
It's a really bad buy idk why you recommended it.
4 cores 4 threads and no hyperthreading for more money, you kind of screwed him.
Even if he is an Intel fanboy you gotta wait until you can get the 7700K at this stage of gaming.
I score 16,000 with a 7700K, double his score. Gaming has been maxing 4 threads for awhile now and add in no hyperthreading going forward it's rough to spend that much on it.
This post was edited on 8/13/17 at 11:48 pm
Posted on 8/14/17 at 12:01 am to SpeedyNacho
Your 1080 score must be low. My 1070 got 19,100
Posted on 8/14/17 at 12:31 am to bluebarracuda
G sync'd
Posted on 8/14/17 at 1:37 am to UltimateHog
quote:
Even if he is an Intel fanboy you gotta wait until you can get the 7700K at this stage of gaming
Only fanboys here are you dude.
Posted on 8/14/17 at 5:09 am to LSU Coyote
Man HBM2 really kept these cards priced too high. Hopeful it will show it's benefits in gaming next cycle, just non right now.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Review Leaks Out – Liquid and Air Cooled Models Tested, Tries To Compete Against GTX 1080 FE With Over 300W Power Consumption
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Review Leaks Out – Liquid and Air Cooled Models Tested, Tries To Compete Against GTX 1080 FE With Over 300W Power Consumption
Posted on 8/14/17 at 8:25 am to LSU Coyote
quote:
With Over 300W Power Consumption
Posted on 8/14/17 at 8:30 am to stout
The Vega 56 appears to be the most intriguing card of hte lineup, especially given its performance compared to the GTX 1070.
Of course, this is all assuming you can get one depending on how fast miners frick up the pricing
Of course, this is all assuming you can get one depending on how fast miners frick up the pricing
Posted on 8/14/17 at 8:51 am to LSU Coyote
And you.
Posted on 8/14/17 at 8:52 am to UltimateHog
Well the liquid cooled Vega 64 ran out of stock before I even had a chance.
Last hope is BH Photo when they post theirs.
Last hope is BH Photo when they post theirs.
Posted on 8/14/17 at 8:55 am to LSU Coyote
Yea I'm 100% going with a 1080 ti now. Baffling that AMDs highest end card is considerably slower than it, and around the same price too.
Posted on 8/14/17 at 10:22 am to bluebarracuda
AMD pretty much said they weren't competing with the 1080ti.
The Vega 56 competes against the 1070, and the Vega 64 against the 1080.
The power difference is a little baffling though.
The Vega 56 competes against the 1070, and the Vega 64 against the 1080.
The power difference is a little baffling though.
Posted on 8/14/17 at 10:26 am to boXerrumble
Isn't the MSRP for the Vega Liquid $699? That is directly competing with the 1080 ti
Posted on 8/14/17 at 10:54 am to bluebarracuda
$599, the pack bundle with 2 games is $699. They'll be sold separately soon enough.
Air 64 is $499. Air 1080tis are 699 and up so quite a big difference.
Air 64 is $499. Air 1080tis are 699 and up so quite a big difference.
Page 1382 of 1912
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News