- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Next Call of Duty delayed until 2024 by Activision,first year since 2005 without a new COD
Posted on 2/23/22 at 7:22 am
Posted on 2/23/22 at 7:22 am
https://www.ign.com/articles/call-of-duty-delayed-first-time-decades
Next Year (2023) won't have a COD, world is changing.
Next Year (2023) won't have a COD, world is changing.
quote:
According to Bloomberg, sources familiar with the situation, executives in charge of the franchise have made the decision early after "a recent entry in the series failed to meet expectations," leading them to believe that Call of Duty's current annual cadence of releases was too rapid. The decision is reportedly unrelated to the recent Microsoft purchase of the publisher, and the 2022 Call of Duty release is still on track.
This post was edited on 2/23/22 at 7:23 am
9
Posted on 2/23/22 at 7:39 am to musick
read some twitter conversations yesterday about how MW2 will be a 2-year game and that all of it's supporting contact won't be ready for at least through the first year after release.
Posted on 2/23/22 at 8:18 am to musick
Considering Call of Duty is a $60 game littered with microtransactions, maybe not developing one for a year could prove more economically feasible. 
Posted on 2/23/22 at 8:33 am to Chimlim
this might have more to do with Treyarch being on a two year cycle. sledgehammer really screwed them with that.
BLOPS 4 (2018)
BOCW (2020)
BLOPS? (2023)
then again, this could be a microsoft decision.
BLOPS 4 (2018)
BOCW (2020)
BLOPS? (2023)
then again, this could be a microsoft decision.
Posted on 2/23/22 at 9:06 am to musick
Good, it hasn't been worthy of a yearly release for awhile.
Posted on 2/23/22 at 12:55 pm to finchmeister08
quote:
this might have more to do with Treyarch being on a two year cycle. sledgehammer really screwed them with that.
SledgeHammer bungled CoD 2020...I'm not even sure if it was supposed to be BLOPS CW but Treyarch had to step in and get something out that wasnt that great. Then Sledgehammer put out Vanguard which even as an easily amused gamer as myself found to be pretty dogshit. So yea I think you are right.
Posted on 2/23/22 at 3:34 pm to musick
It will be called
Call of Duty: Eternal Doom
Call of Duty: Eternal Doom
Posted on 2/23/22 at 3:36 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
it'd be cool if they made a post-apocalyptical game instead of a war type game.
Posted on 2/23/22 at 3:55 pm to musick
I have no idea how this will work out for them, the franchise is in a bad place right now. BUT the current model of annual releases is just not working anymore for the end users. The games have been broken and just not interesting to play at any level. They need to move away from annual releases so for that I give them credit for making the right decision. Let’s hope it’s a really good game and they can find exciting ways to keep people playing for that long.
This post was edited on 2/23/22 at 3:56 pm
Posted on 2/23/22 at 4:50 pm to UltimateHog
quote:
Good, it hasn't been worthy of a yearly release for awhile.
who is downvoting this?
Posted on 2/23/22 at 5:57 pm to sgallo3
Finch for sure.
Posted on 2/23/22 at 5:58 pm to UltimateHog
nah, it wasn't me. i don't go out of my way to do stupid shite like that.
Posted on 2/23/22 at 6:34 pm to musick
Is vanguard good? Worth buying?
Posted on 2/23/22 at 6:51 pm to Woolfman_8
quote:
Is vanguard good? Worth buying?
it's as if WWII happened with WWII era guns, but with red dot sights and ACOGs from the 50s and up.
Posted on 2/23/22 at 7:03 pm to finchmeister08
Lol
Posted on 2/24/22 at 8:15 am to musick
I’d rather games take their time anyway. Yearly releases scream money grab.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 1:42 pm to musick
Well Vanguard sucked so yeah.
Posted on 3/6/22 at 7:02 am to Woolfman_8
quote:
Is vanguard good? Worth buying?
Personally, I’ve enjoyed it. However, it’s the first COD game I’ve really taken the time to get into in a while, so maybe that’s the reason I’ve enjoyed it rather than the game just being really good. As Finch said, it is weird that we have dot sights, ACOG scopes and modern sniper scopes in a WWII game.
Posted on 3/6/22 at 11:14 am to musick
quote:
Next Year (2023) won't have a COD, world is changing.
And yet the 2024 CoD will look and play just like all CoDs that have come before.
That's what I'll never understand about the struggles these CoD developers are having. Every single year since like 2005 a CoD game has released with a 5 hour single player campaign (except Black Ops 4 whereby they couldn't even manage a campaign). Multiplayer is the same game modes over and over. The only thing different is the maps. Does it really take 2-3 years to design each CoD's new (mediocre) multiplayer maps?
At some point you have to stop blaming the development cycle (which isn't annual) and take a hard look at the companies themselves.
This post was edited on 3/6/22 at 11:24 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News