- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: call of duty WW2 - Multiplayer
Posted on 6/25/17 at 9:25 pm to Kel Varnsen
Posted on 6/25/17 at 9:25 pm to Kel Varnsen
quote:
so you can play as a woman? frick 2017
Really?
Posted on 6/25/17 at 9:53 pm to FLObserver
My god what a little girl
Aren't battlefield and COD competing for the same market? Aren't they similar products? Why can't they be compared without y'all crying about it?
FWIW I spend time playing both so I'm not totally loyal to either one.. however, IMO BF is a much better game overall
Aren't battlefield and COD competing for the same market? Aren't they similar products? Why can't they be compared without y'all crying about it?
FWIW I spend time playing both so I'm not totally loyal to either one.. however, IMO BF is a much better game overall
This post was edited on 6/25/17 at 9:55 pm
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:17 pm to Mr. Hangover
CoD fans are a sensitive bunch.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 3:52 am to Mr. Hangover
Battlefield and CoD are two completely different games that play very differently. And it's possible to enjoy both, even though BF has been getting it right more lately than CoD. It seems that CoD may get my money now.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 7:17 am to GeauxLSUGeaux
quote:
Battlefield and CoD are two completely different games that play very differently.
They are direct competitors.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 8:22 am to FLObserver
Nice. Reminds me of the old ones which is awesome.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 9:12 am to GeauxLSUGeaux
They are both war based FPS that cater to the exact same audience...
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:45 am to theducks
quote:
CoD fans are a sensitive bunch.
The first few replies in the thread are from BF fans attacking COD. The OP didn't mention BF.
Can't both games co-exist? The graphics argument is really weak. The best CODs have shitty graphics compared to BF. Not really what the game is about. The two games offer completely different experiences IMO but do compete for the same player base.
This post was edited on 6/26/17 at 10:46 am
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:59 am to FLObserver
What defines a Battlefield geek? I played COD religiously until the boots left the ground, so I moved on to Battlefield. BF is awesome all around. I don't see how anyone can shite on it. Yea, it is a little slower than COD because of the map size, but it is way more realistic. Battlefield also has better graphics, which in my mind is very important to quality of game. Although I left COD when it turned to shite, I am very excited to play the new COD; I even have it preordered.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 11:05 am to WhoDatTigahsTampa
quote:
The graphics in that game's multiplayer remind me of Counterstrike from like '06.
are you playing the game on a TV screen made of vegetables or something?
Posted on 7/2/17 at 8:27 am to FLObserver
Just watched youtube video of guy playing 35 mins of mult-player team deathmatch.
My body is ready
LINK
My body is ready
LINK
This post was edited on 7/2/17 at 8:29 am
Posted on 7/2/17 at 8:43 am to FLObserver
I preordered so I got the extra dlc character packs. Can't wait to play as tyesha Jackson, the transgender waffen ss
Posted on 7/2/17 at 9:13 am to el Gaucho
quote:
battlefield thread folks
Yeah, a weird bunch, no matter how crappy the battlefield games are, they will fight for the game, because it looks better graphically over another. LOL
Call of duty has been garbage since BO2, but Battlefield is crap as well. You can put a diamond on a dogs turd, but it's still a pile of shite.
Popular
Back to top


0








