Started By
Message
locked post

Southern Eagle Purchasing Glazer's Beer Portfolio

Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:43 pm
Posted by Oenophile Brah
The Edge of Sanity
Member since Jan 2013
7540 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:43 pm
This should give Southern Eagle more clout to make deals for more craft beers in LA. They are more concentrated in craft beers then Glazer.
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 9:08 pm to
Probably a good thing in Lafayette, those jokers can't deliver the accounts they have so they could stand to lose a few brands
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101311 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 9:23 pm to
Call me cynical, but I don't know that further consolidation of the state's alcohol distribution network is necessarily a good thing. Personally, I'd like to see the whole thing blown apart, and do away with such a silly and anachronistic forced middle-man system.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278183 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 9:26 pm to
i didnt even know Glazer dealt with beer
Posted by Oenophile Brah
The Edge of Sanity
Member since Jan 2013
7540 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 9:53 pm to
I agree that the system as a whole is horrible. Short of a overhaul(unrealistic), having a major company that is more interested in smaller producers is a good thing. Time will tell, I was just bring to the boards attention.

I'm a more recent convert to beer, thanks in part to some on this board. I look forward to expanding my beer knowledge.
This post was edited on 2/4/13 at 9:55 pm
Posted by tetu
Ascension Parish
Member since Jan 2011
12269 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 10:03 pm to
It would be nice to have access straight from te brewery itself.

Apparently they can sell up to 20% (iirc) at the brewery (some lost law that a suit recently found) so a release day at the end of te year would make it easy for breweries to know how many bottles they can sell directly with ought going over their limit.
Posted by Dac311
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
253 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 7:26 pm to
Word is Mockler has also purchased these rights for BR distribution.
Posted by TypoKnig
Member since Aug 2011
8928 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 8:41 pm to
Southern Eagle in the New Orleans Metro and Champagne on the Northshore share ownership of Mockler.
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 9:32 pm to
So do you want each retailer to have to deal with every winery, distillery , and brewery directly??? Not possible
Posted by Slima
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2006
135 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 9:40 pm to
quote:

Southern Eagle in the New Orleans Metro and Champagne on the Northshore share ownership of Mockler.


It's actually the other way around. Mockler & Champagne own Southern Eagle.

Champagne and Mockler Purchase Southern Eagle
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101311 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

o So do you want each retailer to have to deal with every winery, distillery , and brewery directly??? Not possible


No, not necessarily. I don't think they should be legally deprived of that option, though. Especially when a middleman distributor, who has essentially become a monopoly, is, for whatever reason, unwilling or unable to provide certain products that an individual retailer feels his customers may be demanding.
This post was edited on 2/6/13 at 9:47 pm
Posted by BottomlandBrew
Member since Aug 2010
27068 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 10:25 pm to
Do you work for a distributor? Why should someone be forced to sell through a middleman?
Posted by tetu
Ascension Parish
Member since Jan 2011
12269 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

So do you want each retailer to have to deal with every winery, distillery , and brewery directly??? Not possible
I think he is saying, it shouldn't be illegal to go through other means.

If you want to have a gift shop at your brewery, why shouldn't you be allowed to sell your product? Other
Posted by BigJake
Baton rouge
Member since Jan 2006
1534 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 7:25 am to
The system is a joke for sure. Glazers and Republic have to send multiple reps into each account to service different brand lines in their own company.

There is a monopoly on alcohol in the state. Possibly the country.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101915 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 7:26 am to
quote:

No, not necessarily. I don't think they should be legally deprived of that option, though.


Right... if someone wants to self distribute or sell direct they should be allowed to. If they want to make their lives easier and have a distributor pick up their stock and spread it around, go for it as well!
Posted by tetu
Ascension Parish
Member since Jan 2011
12269 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 8:22 am to
quote:

If they want to make their lives easier and have a distributor pick up their stock and spread it around, go for it as well!
If the three tier system was done away with, everyone would still use a distributor for most accounts. However, it would open up some opportunities.
Posted by s14suspense
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
14689 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 8:40 am to
quote:

If the three tier system was done away with, everyone would still use a distributor for most accounts. However, it would open up some opportunities.


Correct.

Probably open up a situation where a larger craft brewery helps distribute locally the best beers in the area a la Stone in Cali.
Posted by RedHawk
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
8841 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 8:49 am to
quote:

If the three tier system was done away with, everyone would still use a distributor for most accounts. However, it would open up some opportunities.


Yep, like being able to go to the brewery and pick up a keg or cans and bottles.
Posted by BlackenedOut
The Big Sleazy
Member since Feb 2011
5800 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 8:59 am to
quote:

some lost law that a suit recently found


It was really Murphy Painter interpreted the laws one way (which was often subject to whatever he thought) and the new ATC commissioner interprets them correctly.

Im not a betting man, but Troy Hebert is probably going to be beneficial to producers, distributors, and drinkers of the state in helping to relax some of the draconian laws.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101915 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 9:00 am to
quote:

Yep, like being able to go to the brewery and pick up a keg or cans and bottles.


Or breweries brewing special batches for bars and events and not having to go through the middleman.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram