Started By
Message

re: Most restauranted cities per capita

Posted on 8/18/11 at 10:33 am to
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101471 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Fitzmorris, for whatever reason, lists it as an Uptown restaurant.


Dude's got more than a screw or two loose.
Posted by Winkface
Member since Jul 2010
34377 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 10:33 am to
Did you read the op?
Posted by bee Rye
New orleans
Member since Jan 2006
33962 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Did you read the op?
of course not
Posted by plawmac
Member since Dec 2007
3210 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 10:35 am to
quote:

The 3050 number is as accurate as it's going to get. I have personally made sure of that.

Care to share that you personally assured us of that number ? Also, I don't believe most posters on here consider Fitzmorris as an authoritative figure on anything beside his own bloated carcass.
Posted by Winkface
Member since Jul 2010
34377 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 10:36 am to
It usually helps to do that first.
Posted by bee Rye
New orleans
Member since Jan 2006
33962 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 10:38 am to
quote:

It usually helps to do that first.
have you read most of TulaneLSU's posts? I find it is usually best to skip through most of what he says
Posted by TulaneLSU
Member since Aug 2003
Member since Dec 2007
13298 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 10:38 am to
My word is all I have, and I have spent the last year diligently ensuring that 3050 number is as close to accurate as possible and is currently up to date.

As for Fitzmorris' numbers, I would be glad to entertain anyone else's number of "real" restaurants in New Orleans if you can provide it.
This post was edited on 8/18/11 at 10:42 am
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34487 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 11:12 am to
I'm curious where Huntsville, AL is on that list. I swear a new restaraunt opens up every day there. That place has more damn eateries than Shreveport-Bossier and less population.
Posted by TulaneLSU
Member since Aug 2003
Member since Dec 2007
13298 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 11:19 am to
Huntsville population: 420,000
Huntsville restaurant number: 1148
People per restaurant: 366

Would be #13 between Knoxville and Portland.
Posted by Ole Geauxt
KnowLa.
Member since Dec 2007
50880 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 12:22 pm to
180 k for monroe?
that must have been on presidential voting day..
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
75219 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 12:26 pm to
Posted by OTIS2
NoLA
Member since Jul 2008
50134 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

Paul Allen
Posted by Ole Geauxt
KnowLa.
Member since Dec 2007
50880 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 1:01 pm to
i think there was 180k in town to see Paul propose "properly", to PeePie..
Posted by TulaneLSU
Member since Aug 2003
Member since Dec 2007
13298 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 5:21 pm to
The 180K number is from the 2010 Census.
Posted by TulaneLSU
Member since Aug 2003
Member since Dec 2007
13298 posts
Posted on 8/22/11 at 12:55 pm to
Jimbeaux, as you will see on page two of the thread, there is evidence, but I will not say it is definitive, that Orleans Parish has more restaurants that people would consider fast food or chain per non-chain, non-fastfood than the surrounding parishes that make up the New Orleans Metro Area.
Posted by andouille
A table near a waiter.
Member since Dec 2004
10708 posts
Posted on 8/22/11 at 1:03 pm to
I can't see how this data tells us anything about the food culture, or lack of it, for any area. So many variables can make it high or low that have nothing to do with the quality dining possibilities for an area.

I appreciate the effort, because this statistic is frequently used, but it is like rating football players based on shoe size.
Posted by TulaneLSU
Member since Aug 2003
Member since Dec 2007
13298 posts
Posted on 8/22/11 at 1:13 pm to
I agree with you completely. A city could have one hundred locally owned restaurants and a thousand chains, and that city could still be a top food city. Nonetheless, the idea of New Orleans being a pure city in the sense that chains do not proliferate and succeed in the city itself is a myth.

I think it's worth discussing why New Orleans has so many chains. Is it a result of poverty (the poorer one is the more likely one is to eat fast food)? Is it because independent restaurants of quality are isolated, grouped together, or too expensive?
Posted by tetu
Ascension Parish
Member since Jan 2011
12269 posts
Posted on 8/22/11 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

ike rating football players based on shoe size.


I believe this works for basketball 80% of the time.
Posted by andouille
A table near a waiter.
Member since Dec 2004
10708 posts
Posted on 8/22/11 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

Nonetheless, the idea of New Orleans being a pure city in the sense that chains do not proliferate and succeed in the city itself is a myth.


Since I grew up in N.O., I left in the mid-70's, I never thought this. All cities have a vast majority of people who would just as soon eat a Big Mac as a quality sandwich. What makes New Orleans special is the large number of really good to great individually owned places, which makes the available choices so appealing.

If Baton Rouge were not 75 miles from New Orleans and 50 miles from Lafayette, it would be much more highly regarded, but BR suffers by comparison.
Posted by plawmac
Member since Dec 2007
3210 posts
Posted on 8/22/11 at 3:49 pm to
It's a myth only in his mind.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram