- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
America catches some of the world’s best salmon but eats some of the worst
Posted on 7/22/14 at 12:40 am
Posted on 7/22/14 at 12:40 am
LINK
quote:
The US is a salmon-catching powerhouse. Nearly one-third of the world’s wild salmon supply comes from US nets. Even when you take into account farmed salmon, US fishermen still bring around one-tenth of the total supply of salmon to the market. But more than half of America’s salmon catch is going overseas:
It’s not that Americans aren’t eating salmon. They are—just not their own. Two-thirds of the salmon eaten by US consumers is imported—mostly from farms in Chile, Canada and Norway and from processing factories in China. More than just a quirk of taste, this habit of snubbing domestic salmon in favor of foreign farmed fish exemplifies a more disquieting trend for US industry, argues journalist Paul Greenberg in his book American Catch: The Fight for Our Local Seafood (purchase required). It’s the result of an American seafood ignorance that could threaten both the country’s long-term status as a fishing powerhouse and its secure supply of nutritious protein.
The network of freshwater streams and coastal waters of the US’s Pacific Northwest is one of the country’s most bounteous natural resources, supplying many hundreds of millions pounds a year of salmon, some of the most nutritious wild protein in the world. In the early 1900s, species including the king and coho salmon abounded in Oregon, Washington, and northern California.
But a dam-construction bender during the New Deal in the 1930s and 40s destroyed the spawning habitats for millions of salmon. The salmon populations of the Snake and Columbia River systems in particular were decimated, leaving Alaska as the last major US source of wild salmon. The fine web of ponds and streams that form southwest Alaska’s Bristol Bay is the biggest remaining sockeye salmon run on the planet.
quote:
So why are Alaskan fishermen sending more than half of their catch overseas?
Part of it has to do with processing. Since many Americans don’t like picking out bones and are squeamish about eating something with its head still on, they need their seafood broken down and packaged before it hits the frozen section of the grocery store. But deboning and filleting fish is a lot harder to mechanize than, say, carving up a chicken or a hog. So the US has outsourced the vast majority of its processing capacity to places like China, where labor is relatively cheap.
For a long time, when Alaskan fishermen sold their salmon to processing plants in China, after it was defrosted, filleted, deboned, and refrozen, it would be shipped back to the US. Nowadays, a rising share of American-caught salmon is simply staying in Asia, says Greenberg, thanks to China’s surging wealth and Japan’s dwindling fish supply.
But tepid US demand for salmon has been a huge factor too. “Our coastal populations once ate a lot more fish. And the interior would have eaten a lot of freshwater fish that was instead quickly eradicated due to agriculture,” says Greenberg. “There was a mandate in this country to boost the production of land food—we made that a national priority. And once you lose the taste for fish, it’s hard to get it back.”
As a result of that cultural and economic emphasis on “land food,” Americans now eat a little less than half of the global annual average seafood consumption—and consume 13 times as much red meat and poultry as they do seafood.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 12:43 am to hawgfaninc
You know, I read an article the other day where most of what the US catches gets exported, not just salmon. That's bullshite.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 12:46 am to hawgfaninc
quote:
And once you lose the taste for fish, it’s hard to get it back.”
Odd. Talking like its an acquired taste.
What's funny/sad is how its cheaper to send it overseas to process than it is to just process it here
Posted on 7/22/14 at 7:03 am to hawgfaninc
quote:
Americans don’t like picking out bones and are squeamish about eating something with its head still on
This is indicative of the disconnect between many people and the origin of their food.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 7:06 am to Matisyeezy
quote:
You know, I read an article the other day where most of what the US catches gets exported, not just salmon. That's bullshite
Not much of the gulf states seafood gets exported. The only type of seafood that I can think of off of the top of my head is shark which some gets shipped to Mexico.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 7:09 am to OldHickory
quote:
quote:Americans don’t like picking out bones and are squeamish about eating something with its head still on This is indicative of the disconnect between many people and the origin of their food.
Yep, we are one of the only countries that mainly eat fillets. Europeans,Asians,Hispanics for the most part prefer their fish head on.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 7:44 am to hawgfaninc
This crosses my mind every time I'm standing at the fish counter at WF getting something. There is usually only one local, wild caught salmon option. The others are foreign and farmed. I understand they are pushing the sustainable caught stuff but it still makes me sad.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 7:45 am to JasonL79
Doesn't classic French cooking involve mostly fillets?
Posted on 7/22/14 at 7:49 am to OldHickory
quote:
This is indicative of the disconnect between many people and the origin of their food.
I wasn't aware so many women ate salmon
Posted on 7/22/14 at 7:53 am to JasonL79
quote:
Yep, we are one of the only countries that mainly eat fillets. Europeans,Asians,Hispanics for the most part prefer their fish head on.
I'm ok with eating a fish with it's head still on. But I agree with the article about bones. Not a fan of picking those out. True American attitude. I wanna dig in.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:02 am to OldHickory
Head on doesn't bother me but I don't like picking out bones. If I had kids I wouldn't risk it. Typically you miss a bone or two and they're almost swallowed before you catch it.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:03 am to crimsonsaint
Eating whole fish actually makes it easier to avoid bones.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:19 am to hawgfaninc
Les Miles has lost control of US salmon consumption.
Oh, sorry, wrong board.
Oh, sorry, wrong board.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:36 am to Jones
quote:
What's funny/sad is how its cheaper to send it overseas to process than it is to just process it here
true and it's sad, but that's what you get when you can exploit part of your working class for next to nothing wages.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:45 am to Winkface
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:56 am to Winkface
quote:
Doesn't classic French cooking involve mostly fillets?
Not sure.
I just know in my dealings in the seafood business with people not born in the US(in Louisiana and south Florida), they preferred whole fish.
Whole fish grosses some people out for some reason. When I had my market in Baton Rouge, some people wouldn't even eat in my place because I had whole fish in a deli case in the same room as them. They did not like to look at fish while eating. I've had several people tell me that up there. My place was clean and didn't smell like fish either.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:57 am to yellowfin
quote:
I'll be eating whole fish a week from today....place is awesome
Looks good.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 9:11 am to Winkface
Well then have at it.
I grew up eating bream and perch minus the heads but still the body intact. You had to pick out the bones.
I grew up eating bream and perch minus the heads but still the body intact. You had to pick out the bones.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News